Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Software Linux

Pirate Banned From Using Linux 698

dsinc writes "A guy who uploaded the latest Star Wars movie got arrested, pleaded guilty to 'conspiracy to commit copyright infringement' and 'criminal copyright infringement' and got jail and home confinement. As part of his home confinement, he agreed to install some tracking software on his computer. The problem is He's an Ubuntu Linux user and the gov't doesn't have any tracking software for Linux. So he's been told that he must use Windows for the term of his confinement. Looks like a case of cruel and unusual punishment to me"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Pirate Banned From Using Linux

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Why... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Egdiroh ( 1086111 ) on Thursday August 23, 2007 @05:32PM (#20336019)

    are they even allowed to do this? "Oh, well, we can't be bothered to make a system for your operating system, so we'll just force you to use something else!" Duh...
    This is a probation, which means that the alternative is Prison, so I think that as long as they don't take away any more freedoms then would be taken away by sending him to Prison that they are allowed to do it.
  • by ajs ( 35943 ) <ajs.ajs@com> on Thursday August 23, 2007 @05:32PM (#20336021) Homepage Journal
    One presumes that he has been required to surrender his hardware (all of it) to the authorities for the installation of the tracking software which phones home to indicate what he's doing (at whatever level of granularity it tracks such things).

    He could probably get away with VMWare or the like running Linux under Windows, but that would just run the risk of landing him in jail.

    His best bet is Cygwin [cygwin.com], the suite of open source tools for Windows that includes everything you need to essentially subvert a Windows desktop and make it think it's a Unix-like OS. It's not 100% perfect, but it's a far cry better than pure Windows. I regularly use a Windows laptop with X running under it, ssh to my office with X-forwarding and several gnome-terminals running on my work desktop.

    Other than that, the only native Windows apps I use are Firefox and Thunderbird, so it's often hard to tell what OS it actually is.
  • by mark-t ( 151149 ) <markt.nerdflat@com> on Thursday August 23, 2007 @05:32PM (#20336033) Journal
    Most likely not. I expect as a concession to even allowing him internet access at ALL, they probably strictly control what computer hardware the man is allowed to have in his own home. It might sound a bit tough, but bear in mind that this is not an innocent man here... he pled guilty to the charges and this is just part of the punishment.
  • Linux is my life man (Score:5, Interesting)

    by kentrel ( 526003 ) on Thursday August 23, 2007 @05:38PM (#20336109) Journal
    "It isn't the fact that I have to be monitored that bothers me, it is the fact that I have [to] restructure my life (different OS, different software on that OS)"

    In jail for 5 months and he thinks changing Operating System needs more of a life restructuring.

    Perhaps, this sentence will give him the perfect opportunity to finally find a life outside of his linux box.

  • Re:Why... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by gad_zuki! ( 70830 ) on Thursday August 23, 2007 @05:38PM (#20336111)
    >are they even allowed to do this? "Oh, well, we can't be bothered to make a system for your operating system, so we'll just force you to use something else!" Duh...

    No, the taxpayers cant be bothered to pay for more coding software. Hell, considering his crimes it just be better to not allow him computer use during probabtion, if he doesnt like that he cant spend those 5 months in prison. I know what I'd pick. Incredible how we coddle our criminals. Whats next a personal butler and compensation for jail time spent? Hot chocolate?
  • Re:Why... (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 23, 2007 @05:39PM (#20336121)
    It's not a car analogy but anyway:

    You're confined to house arrest and required to wear an ankle bracelet. But...you have no legs so they chain you into the radiator instead.

  • by Bastardchyld ( 889185 ) on Thursday August 23, 2007 @05:44PM (#20336195) Homepage Journal
    It is also important to point out that he received a shorter jail-term because of probation that was no doubt recommended by his attorney (due to the "non-violent" nature of his crimes). Now that he is on probabation he does not like the terms... My opinion is big deal, do you think a drunk driver wants to go to AA, have an ignition bypass installed? Besides he could choose to not use the internet for the remainder of his probation anyways...

    Nothing to see here.
  • Re:Oh My God!!! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by 644bd346996 ( 1012333 ) on Thursday August 23, 2007 @05:53PM (#20336281)
    I really don't care about the monitoring software. To me, the big wrong is that he is being compelled to purchase a software license from a third party in order to use the equipment he already owns. Not only that, but the money must go to a specific corporation: Microsoft. While it may not be unconstitutional, it certainly should be illegal for the government to require citizens to purchase commercial software.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 23, 2007 @06:23PM (#20336673)
    This is tracking software created for legal purposes, which doesn't need to hide itself from the user. Assuming that the same software is used for intrusive intelligence gathering is... a leap, to say the least.

    I expect the ideal software package for the first purpose would have an installer, an uninstaller(the sentence will end sometime) and report back periodically with reports on large-scale network activit (torrents and the like).

    The ideal software for the latter package is basically a worm or a virus with a rootkit included, which would maintain network silence for long stretches of time(allowing itself to spread) before "stealthily"(of course there's practically a limit as to how stealthily this can be done) reporting all collected information—the contents of incoming and outgoing emails, the contents of "interesting" local files, and so on.

    The two don't really overlap all that much.
  • by Graff ( 532189 ) on Thursday August 23, 2007 @06:30PM (#20336793)
    Ahh, this makes me glad that I'm still using a PowerPC Macintosh since it can't run Windows directly. Yeah it can run it in emulation but only under the regular Mac OS operating system and there's no way the emulated Windows environment can determine what's going on in the main Mac OS. They can tell me to run Windows all they want, unless they buy me a brand new computer it ain't happening!

    Of course eventually I'll upgrade to an Intel Macintosh and those can run Windows directly.

    Hmm couldn't he just get a live Linux CD and boot his monitored computer using that? The government can install Windows and monitoring software all they want, there's no way a monitoring program can work if it's not being run. Of course if he is caught using the internet and the monitoring software isn't running then he would be in worse trouble...
  • Instead, Why not... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by charlieman ( 972526 ) on Thursday August 23, 2007 @06:40PM (#20336927)
    run the government software on WINE?
  • Re:Why... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by SCHecklerX ( 229973 ) <greg@gksnetworks.com> on Thursday August 23, 2007 @06:41PM (#20336961) Homepage
    installing software is the wrong way to go about this anyway. The gvt. should have an appliance that they stick between his router and the ISP connection. Have that box run whatever it is they want for monitoring and reporting. It'd be easy to make sure it isn't tampered with, and is always running that way too.

    Hmm...I wonder how lucrative starting such a business to provide these things to authorities would be, seems like a fun project.
  • by Crayon Kid ( 700279 ) on Thursday August 23, 2007 @07:23PM (#20337447)
    If you'll RTFA you'll notice they pretty much don't give a rat's ass about his personal situation. He's unemployed and unemployable and they're making him buy a Windows copy. It's like a fine thrown on top of the jail and home confinement. If he didn't have the hardware it would just be the same. He can sell a kidney and pay for Windows or he can stop using the Internet for all they care.
  • by bigstrat2003 ( 1058574 ) on Thursday August 23, 2007 @07:32PM (#20337553)

    Mandating operating system *is* an arbitrary term (regardless of their excuse)
    It really isn't. They don't have monitoring software, except on Windows, so he uses Windows. That's not arbitrary at all, that's merely a necessary consequence of the tools they have available. I'm glad they're making him use Windows, too, because I'd rather not have my tax dollars wasted on development of new ones just so criminals don't have to use an OS they don't like.
  • by sepluv ( 641107 ) <blakesley&gmail,com> on Thursday August 23, 2007 @08:48PM (#20338319)

    This power, to selectively enforce the law, is used more often than you might think.
    I'm sure everyone here is aware that it is used a lot. That doesn't itself make it a good thing and you don't seem to have presented any valid arguments why it is a good thing.

    Maybe the parent was suggesting that it might be good to move towards a concept called equality before the law. If laws had to be enforced equally, the legislators would have to get rid of the plethora silly minor offences on the statute books that criminalise stuff that everyone does (including those same legislators). Then the police might have to spend their time going after real criminals as opposed to selectively enforcing such statutes against people they don't like the look of. I can see how that would be a terrifying dystopia..uhhh...wait

  • by zippthorne ( 748122 ) on Friday August 24, 2007 @12:38AM (#20340063) Journal
    I have a laptop that uses ME and it works fine. Well it worked fine when I got it, and for about five years after that. Trying to juggle two cases and the laptop while pushing a carry-on bag through the line for TSA fun have resulted in impact related hardware issues around the keyboard somewhere.

    I don't see what the big deal about ME was. It worked as well as anything for the tasks it was intended.
  • by Technician ( 215283 ) on Friday August 24, 2007 @12:47AM (#20340105)
    To work around keyloggers, he could enter his password using character map, or store passwords in a text file on a thumb drive and cut and paste.

    This appears to be not a key logger but an Internet traffic monitor. As such, it may be able to capture anything of intrest such as logging into email regardless of whatever you did to defeat a key logger. Booting a live CD and not loading anything from the hard drive will work against this mandatory software. The risk is if he got busted for being online and the log doesn't compare with an upstream log.

    More needs to be known about the mandatory software.

    With luck the ISP will protect his records. If ISP shares the list of traffic times, IP address, MAC address and such and it doesn't jive with the report from the mandatory software, then he is screwed.

    His best bet is to use the mandatory software and not log into any personal accounts of any kind to prevent disclosure. I wouldn't even use any old passwords/username for the windows install. It would all be new for the monitor to protect any accounts existing they may be trying to access.

    It's time for a new gmail account with a username like FBImonitored@gmail.com
  • Re:A better solution (Score:3, Interesting)

    by wjsroot ( 732775 ) on Friday August 24, 2007 @02:21AM (#20340545)
    Or he could use an ubuntu live CD...

"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." - Bert Lantz

Working...