2008 - Year of Linux Desktop? 659
rstrohmeyer writes "Over at Maximum PC, we're betting that Linux will pick up unprecedented momentum in the coming year. With phenomenal new distros, swelling international support, and a little extra momentum from Dell, we think Linux is poised to exploit the current atmosphere of doubt surrounding Vista and pick up serious traction in '08. 'For end users here in North America, Linux poses a low barrier to entry. While many still balk at an upgrade to Vista (typically centered around cost and restrictive licensing terms), those who are curious about the open-source alternative will find few of these obstacles. And an increasingly rich array of ready-to-run software (not to mention surprisingly effective utilities that let you run many Windows apps) makes it easy switch ... Ultimately, I'm not predicting that Linux will take over the market next year. Or anytime soon, for that matter. But if there's ever been a time to try out the world's leading free OS, 2008 will be that time. I am predicting that users will switch to Linux in record numbers next year. And many will never look back.'"
Ooops ... (Score:5, Informative)
CC.
if only linux had more games. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:if only linux had more games. (Score:2, Informative)
Not even on Windows there's a "standard library" of any sort, it's not like games can be written only in one language or using only one graphics API.
Why does there have to be one? (Score:5, Informative)
It's "Linux desktop" for me already. All of my computers now exclusively run Linux. I have no Windows installs on my server, firewall, laptop or desktop, and only have a couple of Win2K installs in vmware lying around mostly for the very rare times when I need to compile something for Windows.
For me, the switch to Linux was gradual. I didn't just one day decide to do the switch. Over time, my working Windows installs started failing and I found myself using Linux instead, as it was easier than to spend a weekend reinstalling everything. Eventually I was spending months without booting it, and finally it vanished completely when I upgraded hard disks and didn't have any reason to install it.
I don't really see a "Year of Linux desktop" happening. People seem to like their weird theories about what's holding Linux back, as if changing directory structure, or getting rid of X would suddenly make Linux become really popular overnight. It won't. People will gradually fix the problems there are, and its market share will progressively go up, as people run out of reasons not to use it.
Re:How is WINE/Codeweavers doing these days? (Score:3, Informative)
As usual, YMMV.
Re:Why GNU/Linux, of all things? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:2027 - year of fusion power? (Score:3, Informative)
I'm rooting for desktop Linux to continue to make gains, but I think the widespread acceptance that the article suggests (but doesn't predict, mind you) will take a lot longer. Right now, Vista's main competitor is XP. Vista adoption has been slow because most Windows users are satisfied with XP and don't see much value in upgrading to Vista.
I'm a happy* Mac user, but I like knowing that there are viable alternatives out there like Ubuntu, etc.
*not that there is anything wrong with that
Re:2027 - year of fusion power? (Score:0, Informative)
My wife used family Tree Maker also... (Score:4, Informative)
She is quite happy with it.
Re:2027 - year of fusion power? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:A tiny market... (Score:5, Informative)
PS. It's been a few years since Loki, and there're more Linux users now. You might wanna update your stupid flamebait.
Who's Got The Earliest Link? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Sadly (Score:2, Informative)