Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Linux Business Operating Systems Software Windows

Ubuntu Dell $50 Cheaper Than Vista Dell 389

rhinokitty writes "Dell recently announced that their Ubuntu systems will be $50 cheaper than similar systems running Vista (Home Basic Edition). This will be a good fork in the road for those people who need a little extra push to take hold of their dreams and run Linux."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ubuntu Dell $50 Cheaper Than Vista Dell

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Is Ubuntu good? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by fonik ( 776566 ) on Tuesday July 03, 2007 @11:33PM (#19739463)
    My little brother just installed Ubuntu on his home machine. He's in the 8th grade and his windows installation had to be wiped after the ISP threatened to shut down his internet service because of all the botware. I'd say it's a pretty easy distro.
  • Re:Is Ubuntu good? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Tribbin ( 565963 ) on Tuesday July 03, 2007 @11:35PM (#19739487) Homepage
    It's the distro I install for all my friends.

    When I reinstall Windows for a friend, I put Ubuntu on their computer next to windows and tell them to boot it if windows fails again.

    It takes a couple of months before they really need to fall back on it. And in the meanwhile, at moments when they feel brave, they take a peek in the rabbithole.

    And they confirm; Ubuntu does a great job for a fresh user.
  • Not bad (Score:3, Interesting)

    by no-body ( 127863 ) on Tuesday July 03, 2007 @11:55PM (#19739623)
    at all...

    Go to dell.com, type in Linux as search, click on suggested link (ignore the recommended M$ stuff)
    - select Ubuntu,
    "XPS 410 N"
    click through "adding features",
    leave everything as default and...:

    "1Yr In-Home Service, Parts + Labor - Next Business Day"

    I like it!

  • by mpapet ( 761907 ) on Tuesday July 03, 2007 @11:56PM (#19739629) Homepage
    In Ubuntu's case, the GUI looks familiar and there isn't any need whatsoever for a firewall and anti-virus software, even though that's available too. If your needs are like most, you won't miss a thing.

    There are two steep learning curves:

    1. Putting the finishing touches on most of the applications included. An example is the kmail spam filter bogofilter. Sure, there's a gui to sort of get it going, but you'll discover it doesn't really work until you set up the wordlist.db and a cron job to feed the wordlist. None of which is obvious.

    2. Troubleshooting. It's all different underneath and it takes some time to figure it out. But it's logical. Once you get the hang of it, it's much easier to use.
  • Re:$50? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by fonik ( 776566 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @12:11AM (#19739723)
    Heh, yeah.

    I like the part of the www.dell.com/open site where it asks you if you are there by mistake and suggests you go back to looking at Windows machines.

    The main thing to note is that when you choose open source you don't get a Windows® operating system. If you're here by mistake and you are looking for a Dell PC with Windows, please use the following link.

    Shop Dell PCs with Windows
    They even put the link to their Windows machines BEFORE the link to the Ubuntu machines. If you were selling cars and someone showed interest in an import, would you ask, "Are you SURE you want to buy one of THOSE?" Their machines work great, but the website is serious WTF material.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @12:33AM (#19739885)
    Well, it would mean mass adoption of Linux if people could just choose between Linux and windows like any other component and see that it was $50 cheaper. Right now Linux is still buried on the dell website, so people have to know what they want instead of just getting funneled to the Dell Windows PCs. But it is a good first step, I have to give Dell that much. As long as the price parity is kept up and Linux Dell PCs don't end up costing more than Windows Dell PCs like they did before. Where if Linux was an option on the standard configuration screen, then it would save me some effort. It is somewhat annoying that I will have to configure my next Dell PC twice just to make sure I am getting the best deal from Dell, but such is the burden of comparison shopping. And if they do let the Linux PCs get buried in their catalog and don't offer the same deals on them as the Windows PCs, then people will just buy the better deal and install Linux and dell will lose valuable marketing data... so they won't really know their customers again.

    Oh... but as was mentioned before Ubuntu is just for the home market, they won't sell it to corporate customers. They sell either SUSE or Redhat to business customers, which have prices comparable to Windows. But generally corporate IT wants extra expenses, because everything is about insuring that someone outside the company can be called (blamed) when data is lost or productivity is hurt by downtime. "Commercial off the shelf beats just "off the shelf" in corporate decision making circles. And really small businesses will save $50 (times 5, 10 or 20 computers ) by ordering them through the home and small office section and simply have them sent to the owner's house.

    I've seen the ways small, medium and large businesses operate and there is a remarkable difference in the way decisions are made. You value money differently when it isn't going into or coming out of your pocket.

  • by Repossessed ( 1117929 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @12:49AM (#19739987)
    Doing a quick one over of the systems available, for a 15 inch screen, you're looking at 1,194 dollars for a minimum Vista notebook with full performance. (2 gigs of RAM, and a 2 GHz dual core processor). A 15 inch Ubuntu notebook, will cost you just 599 dollars. Thanks to the low hardware requirements of Linux systems. (It's quite literally twice as powerful as the desktop I'm typing from now.) There's a couple caveats there, in that I'm not sure if the optical drive and hard drive are comparable between the two. (i'm too lazy too check). And that for a desktop, the price difference won;t be as bad. (An acceptable processor and RAM for Vista gets very expensive for the notebooks, not as much so as for the desktops.) I'm also not sure how long this will last, Dell is still shipping the old 1505s for Ubuntu, the price will probably go up if they start using 1520s instead. (There's no appreciable difference in specs that I can find, though this may change once better Intel processors come out (the 1520 uses a different socket type.)). Oh, and if you want the fancy graphics stuff for Vista, you're going to need another 230 dollars (30 for the software and 200 for a 256 megabyte graphics card.) I'm not sure how much of a hardware upgrade it would take to run the 3D desktop options for Linux though, so I have no point of comparison to make there.
  • by jerquiaga ( 859470 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @12:50AM (#19740001)
    I can't think of a single person that I've talked to recently that said, "you know what, I'm just dreaming of the day when Dell will sell me a computer with Ubuntu on it so I can finally run Linux." Most of the people I know what know what to do with themselves if they had Linux on their computer. If everyone I know suddenly had Linux, the number of phone calls I get about computers would increase by a factor of ten, at least. I would be willing to pay the extra $50 for them to get the Vista version, since it would at least be less scary for them.
  • by 2Bits ( 167227 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @02:00AM (#19740331)
    From our own experience, what Dell is doing is just half-hearted attempt, at best, to gather some good press. Their offer of Linux-based laptop is ridiculous. And anyone who thinks that the move may be the beginning of Linux world domination, well, hate to break it to you, that's pipe dream.

    We had bought a few Dell laptops in the last six months, and every one of them is so-called Linux-based laptop. When we open the box, here's the list of what we found:

    - The machine and components, the usual suspects (no surprise here)
    - one CD containing a partial list of different drivers for ... guess... that's right, Windows. And I said partial list because you still need to go out tracking some of the most important drivers, such the graphic driver, sound driver, etc. (I'll explain later)
    - one CD of junk softwares that you will never use, for ... guess again... that's right, Windows.
    - 3 CDs of Red Flag Linux (yeah, in China, that is).

    I booted up the machine, half of them came with DOS installed, but you can't do anything much as there's no driver for anything anyway. The other half came with absolutely nothing installed. Empty disk.

    Ok, just for the heck of it, to see if they actually tried to install the linux distro themselves. I installed Red Flag Linux, it installed fine, but missing a few drivers, or won't detect properly. I had to mess with it for a while to get it to work, but still the graphics is not working optimally.

    Ok, so far, I don't think any buyer is going with Linux here.

    So, I installed Windows XP. And the drivers CD is missing some serious drivers, I ended up with a system which was not any better than with Linux. I looked up the support web site, enter the serial number, and the system told me the serial number of that machine does not exist. Who cares, I just downloaded a bunch of drivers to try out, those drivers that are published for the models close to the one I have. Doesn't work.

    After half a day of messing around, I called tech support. Nice guy, actually. He told me that the drivers downloaded from the web site don't work, because I have a "pirated" copy of Windows XP. Ok, fine, give me those that work then. He emailed a few links to get those missing drivers. None of these links showed up on their web site.

    Go figure. With that kind of so-called "support", I doubt Joe Sixpacks is going to have Linux on that machine.
  • by EjectButton ( 618561 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @02:53AM (#19740633)
    While it is a good first step that Dell is selling Ubuntu machines, and not charging you (as much) for a license that you aren't even purchasing, HP has been doing this for quite a while though they don't seem to get much press for it.

    If you look at hp laptops and desktops in their "business" section many of them will list "FreeDOS" as an available os, or if they have a "Configure PC" link under the model often times it means you can choose between Windows and FreeDOS in the configuration options. One difference may be that if you get a FreeDOS pc from HP, format the drive and put Linux on it HP probably isn't going to give you any software support whereas maby Dell (or Canonical?) offers some level of support included in their price. Though if you are willing to forgo softwate technical support and just want hardware warranty coverage (for example if you are a large institution purchasing many computers is bulk) you can get a larger discount for non-windows machines from HP than Dell. The price varies but for most of their business notebooks and desktops the difference between a model with Windows XP/Vista and that same model with FreeDOS is usually $75-$150

    Hopefully Dell's apparent success in selling Ubuntu desktops (and the publicity that has come with it) will push HP into doing something similar, I am a bit surprised Dell beat them to the punch on this one considering HP has:
    been encouraging the use of Debian on the server end for a while
    http://h20331.www2.hp.com/services/cache/442406-0- 0-0-121.html [hp.com]

    Already provides good driver support for Linux with regard to printers
    http://hplip.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]

    And the current "Linux CTO" is a former Debian project leader
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bdale_Garbee [wikipedia.org]

    I would expect to see more announcements like this in the near future from the OEMs. Whatever argument the OEMs still had against selling desktop Linux and thereby irritating Microsoft was recently dealt a significant blow by Microsoft's announcement that they would begin selling their own machines http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/ 28/181204 [slashdot.org]
    which from the OEMs perspective has changed Microsoft from an annoying element that everyone has to deal with and who gets a cut of their profit, to a company that is now moving towards being a direct competitor.
  • by Eivind ( 15695 ) <eivindorama@gmail.com> on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @04:14AM (#19741021) Homepage
    But there are several trends coming together. Each individual one may not count for much, but the sum total is still starting to look interesting.
    • The average price of new computers is falling.
    • The price of Windows, both in pure dollars and in requirements is rising sharply.
    • Linux is getting easier and easier for the non-geeks to use.
    • You can get pre-installed Linux from vendors people have heard of. This matters.
    • There's a large amount (though not as large as I'd like) of articles and news-coverage of consumer-hostile "features" in Vista.
    • There is a distinct lack of *advantage* for a consumer moving from XP to Vista, in other words, MS has done next to *nothing* worthwhile for a consumer in the last 5-6 years.
    • Vista has horrible hardware-support. Of the 5 usb-gadgets that my wife uses, 2 failed to work with Vista. For one, an Epson-scanner, the status is: "Drivers will be released in february". Meanwhile, Linux supports more hardware out-of-the-box than any other operating-system ever has. (though not more than XP plus additional drivers)

    None of these are deal-breakers, really. And most people will certainly buy the "default" choice, Vista, without really giving it second thougths. But *some* will start thinking.

    Linux certainly won't displace Windows on the desktop this year, or the next. But it'll continue doing what it's been doing quietly for years already: growing.

  • by FST777 ( 913657 ) <`frans-jan' `at' `van-steenbeek.net'> on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @04:33AM (#19741099) Homepage
    Actually, I do. I generally have a 4G FreeDOS partition somewhere on my drives. It's one of the four OS'es I have on my system. I use it to troubleshoot, run old games, inspect old floppies, create those whacky Compaq BIOS floppies for some old systems I encounter, etc. Quite usefull at times (and DOS has its beauties). Besides that, the partition is used to swap data between FreeBSD, openSUSE and WinXP.

    Your main point stands though.
  • by LingNoi ( 1066278 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @05:16AM (#19741309)

    The fact you may get too many of them on Vista usually signifies improperly setup account, or poorly written software.
    Yes, its always the developers fault. Poor drivers on Vista? Nvidia's fault. Too many security alerts? Software Developers fault. BSOD when plugging in a scanner? Driver makers fault.

    Lets face it Windows users never question why their most essential piece of software should be so easily broken and unrecoverable without re-installation, but lets face it they never will. They'll happily go on blaming Nvidia for their late drivers while it took Microsoft 2 years just to design the damn shutdown button.

    Please do go ahead and blame anyone you want for why your system sucks but I will never find it acceptable for my operating system to be so prone to errors and unrecoverable from a system failure whether it is Windows, Ubuntu or Mac.
  • Re:Is Ubuntu good? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by sinthetek ( 678498 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @07:28AM (#19741957) Homepage
    I believe you are mistaken in your conclusion and most of your supporting statements. I installed kubuntu for my 12 year old sister over a year ago (she's 13 now) and have only had to help her with a few minor problems like upgrading to Flash 9 before there was a package ready.

    Many, if not most, Windows applications can be installed and used easily enough with wine. When my ex-girlfriend's Windows crashed and her 'recovery' cds weren't good enough to recover, I gave her a kubuntu cd to try. She had it installed in 30 minutes and the first thing she said was "I can't use this without the official YIM client" (paraphrased, but that's the jist of it). I told her I don't DO proprietary software and wasn't sure how to go about installing it on kde/ubuntu.

    Within 5-10 minutes she had found simple and comprehensive documentation on how to install and setup all of her favorite and necessary Windows applications in ubuntu. Another 30-40 minutes, and she had Word, IE, YIM and several other Windows programs installed with icons and menu entries. I am still not sure how she did it.

    My ex had 0 experience with Linux except what I had told her, which was pretty much just stuff about the opensource philosophy and some features I had mentioned. One of the biggest/best advantages of linux is how easily support and documentation can be found and used.

    As for the other shortcomings you mentioned, they are shortcomings of the sites and those who developed them, not Ubuntu or Linux. Keep in mind which software/OSes are compliant to standards and which aren't. The question was: "Is Ubuntu good?", not "Is Ubuntu good at viewing substandard websites or running proprietary software for another OS out of the box?". Since it provides alternatives to most of the proprietary software you mentioned and clearly marks their function, as well as can be easily modified to run the proprietary counterparts, the answer to this question should be "Yes".
  • C For Effort (Score:3, Interesting)

    by christurkel ( 520220 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @09:08AM (#19742651) Homepage Journal
    I just ordered one of laptop from Dell, due in a week or so. I knew where to look and what to get. Then I did it as if I was Joe Clueless who heard about Ubuntu and wants to look at Dell and what they offer.
    Take a look at the front page of Dell.com. What do you see? Lots of products but no mention of Ubuntu. Let's look at a laptop, I see many options. I look and pick one. The option for this Ubuntu thing must be here. I pick a laptop. I look. Comes with Windows Vista Home Edition. Huh? Maybe its under "Build yours". I try that.
    I click a couple of options and see "Operating Systems" Maybe this is it? I click on it. It gives me a choice between Windows Vista Home and Home Premium.
    What he doesn't realize that its back on the product page under "Essential Links"...Open Source PCs. Click on that and you get a choice between "Shop Ubuntu" or "Shop for FreeDos" which are under "Shop for Dell PCs with Windows"
    I know that Dell Ubuntu products are aimed at tech enthusiasts and Open Source fans but if Dell hopes to be successful beyond a niche market they need to try a lot harder.
  • by doktorjayd ( 469473 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @09:48AM (#19743023) Homepage Journal

    $50? pfft.

    bet theres still a $100 goes to MS clause in there somewhere.

    if the vista basic is a couple hundred in the stores, presume OEM's are getting it at half that ( and passing on to consumers), so knocking off the license sticker and bundling a free OS...

    smells like not quite adding up to me.
     
  • Re:Is Ubuntu good? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Walkingshark ( 711886 ) on Wednesday July 04, 2007 @11:38AM (#19744013) Homepage
    I recently bought a Dell laptop with Ubuntu (which I am typing this message on) and it is extremely easy to pick up. One of the cool little things that the post above forgot was that when you're connecting to wireless networks, its a simple dropdown menu that lists all the available networks with bars for their current signal strength. Much easier and more user friendly than windows. Thats true pretty much across the board. The only real problem I've had was when I ran the updates and the basic linux updates screwed up the boot loading. There are instructions on how to fix it but I've been nervous about updating my core ever since that happened. So, not _perfect_, but compared to Windows I'd say it is very, very good.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...