A CIO's View of SUSE's Enterprise Viability 184
onehitwonder writes "As part of an ongoing quest to find a viable alternative to the Microsoft desktop in the enterprise, well-known healthcare CIO John Halamka spent a month using Novell SUSE 10 as his sole operating system. His conclusion? It's good enough for the enterprise. In Windows vs. Linux vs. OS X: CIO John Halamka Tests SUSE, he explains how SUSE stacks up against RHEL, Fedora, XP and OS X (in a life-critical business environment), and which issues should influence an enterprise-class organization to adopt it."
Now That's a Good Viewpoint (Score:5, Informative)
These are NOT life critical... (Score:3, Informative)
The life-maintaining equipment runs only secure hardware, with mathematically proven code, and fiber-optic links for isolation (to prevent electrocution hazards). There was even a heart monitor someone made and posted to
SuSE will NOT run on the dangerous equipment. It will run on the network as a "online chart". Many people should be against that as well, for altogether different reasons. This is somewhat critical, as most med groups run paper charts just in case..
Why listen to this guy? (Score:4, Informative)
See http://www.medical-journals.com/r0313.htm [medical-journals.com]
Re:Authenticate into AD? (Score:2, Informative)
and samba does integrate tightly into AD. It can server as a PDC, BDC or standalone Fileserver.
Well Twitter, (Score:5, Informative)
Desktop computers ("PCs" in the vernacular) run things like, please excuse me if this raises your blood pressure, Microsoft Office, Windows Explorer, Outlook and Bugs Bunny wallpapers. The critical systems typically use an embedded OS (ventilators and other machines that go "ping") or they run some UNIX variant (CTs, MRIs).
I'm trying desperately to get our small hospital off of XP. All we run are the above "productivity" apps and a bizarre VT100 terminal program that talks to the billing / order entry / lab system. Any reasonable Linux system would be fine except that company that runs the back end system won't allow anything but this oddball emulator to talk to their system. (Don't even think of VMware or similar - that's much too complex for them).
But anyway, don't have a heart attack if you see the green and blue wavy fields on the screen at your local ER. It won't shock you.
Re:Why listen to this guy? (Score:4, Informative)
Actually ... (Score:4, Informative)
Though he personally is pleased with the OS, Halamka is not so sure he'd deploy it widely in his organization.
Although he apparently thought much more of SuSE then he did of RedHat, which is covered in this article:
http://www.cio.com/article/41140 [cio.com]
Incidentally, in that article (which is the actual comparison) he says the best OS is Mac OS X, although his favorite piece of hardware is a Dell?!?
]{
Re:Now That's a Good Viewpoint (Score:4, Informative)
Well that's just a load of crap.