Ubuntu Feisty Fawn Released 590
Lots of readers told us about the official release of Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn (screenshots here for Ubuntu and Kubuntu). Some readers report that the distribution servers are being hammered. Here is a review of Feisty Fawn. Reader LinuxScribe sends us to LinuxPlanet for the story on a pleasant Java surprise in the release.
slashdotted... this time IRC, not HTTP (Score:4, Interesting)
#ubuntu = 1600 users
#ubuntu-release-party = 850 users
In the last hour, these have both gone up by around 100-200 each. 24hrs ago, #ubuntu-release-party had 20 people.
Apparently this is a new record for the freenode IRC network!
Forget whether or not ubuntulinux.org can remain online, everyone start praying for the poor folk at freenode
UbuntuStudio (Score:2, Interesting)
Java (Score:3, Interesting)
PowerPC (Score:1, Interesting)
What's new? (Score:5, Interesting)
sources : blog 1 [sabza.org], blog 2 [blogspot.com]
I already have all of these setup on Edgy, so I won't upgrade.
GUI upgrade? (Score:1, Interesting)
Pity it's still so ugly though - someone needs to steal away an OSX designer or two hehe
Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University (Score:5, Interesting)
I've never seen anything even close to this smooth. It's not just a Linux-best. It's quite simply the best I've ever seen.
Oh, and did I mention I lied above ? You see, all the messages mentioned was nicely localized into my native written Language, nynorsk, the least used variant of Norwegian, which perhaps half a million people in the world write. I'm impressed.
Re:Java is not YET Free software (Score:2, Interesting)
There will likely never be a large installed base of Linux users until a distribution hits the market that is a viable alternative to windows for most tasks.
It's really a chicken-egg problem.
If you want to wage jihad with the closed-software community, you have the option of going with a variety of different distributions that are much more focused on that.
If, instead, you want to build the very best Linux desktop you can, you do what Ubuntu is doing. Politics be damned. The people who view free software as religion or political platform tend to block it into a corner that will always relegate it to a niche market in the view of the general public. At the end of the day, the vast VAST majority of users could care less about whether the driver is close-sourced, or open sourced or anything in between. They care mostly that it works, and secondly that it costs them nothing in terms of time and money to make it work. Ubuntu is aimed at those users. Those users are the ones who will have to use Linux to get it out of the niche. And once it becomes a sizable portion of the market, we will see better drivers.
Re:Why Can't Linux Developers Match OS X (Score:1, Interesting)
Now that's a feature!
Re:Java is not YET Free software (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University (Score:3, Interesting)
Requiring administrative/root privileges to install software is the whole point. You are installing programs that are to be used system-wide. You need root privileges (granted to you via sudo) to do that. It's not a security hole when implemented properly. The point is that, unlike many Windows desktop, you're not running with 'root' privileges all the time. This is exactly what most Windows XP desktops are doing. You never need to be prompted for a 'root'/admin password when doing that, because you're always admin! That's insecure.
Re:Fast mirror at Indiana University (Score:4, Interesting)
Blizzard then has an http seed running. If the program determines that you are incapable of recieving a torrent (firewall or driver issues), then your entire download comes straight from blizzard's http seed. If the program is able to connect to the swarm, you then start recieving data down from the other people downloading the patch AS WELL as the blizzard seed. Likewise, if you connect a long time after the patch comes out and there is nobody left downloading the patch, you still get the data straight from blizzard without having to find the file in a different manner.
In this model you have basically a standard server/client relationship when only one person is downloading and it scales out to a p2p model as additional people connect.
Re:Why Can't Linux Developers Match OS X (Score:4, Interesting)
Leopard (OS X 10.5) is going to have multiple desktops in October. And the real reasons I use OS X aren't so much the interface as it's Textmate and Quicksilver. There is no text editor on any platform that can compare to TextMate, and Quicksilver is one of the greatest interface innovations since the GUI.
Of course, they make me use Windows at work.