Gentoo On Server Considered Harmful 372
Siker writes in to point out his blog post — Why Gentoo Shouldn't Be On Your Server — which seems to have stirred up a lot of discussion, including a thread on the Gentoo forums. From the post: "I firmly believe in updating server software only when you need to. If you don't need new features, and things are working, why change anything? If you update anything you will undoubtedly need to update configuration files. You will need to fix things that break in the upgrade process... This is hard with Gentoo. Gentoo wants you to change a lot of stuff. It wants to be bleeding edge."
Not for me! (Score:5, Funny)
Redhat 6.2 (Score:5, Funny)
Oh! I Guess Non-MS SW Has "Issues" Too! (Score:3, Funny)
Where, oh where, is the standard Slashdot drivel from you sanctimonious Slashdot twits?
My gentoo server... (Score:4, Funny)
So, now when server issue has been explained exhaustingly, we can talk about my gentoo programer's desktop, gentoo electronics lab and drill machinery controller, gentoo adsl/wifi router and gentoo tv/multimedia nano-itx box.
From my point of view, Siker is just a moron and I mean it seriously.
Re:*sigh* (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Redhat 6.2 (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Redhat 6.2 (Score:4, Funny)
Dude, install NTP. Then you could have kept the machine going without those useless capacitors!
Re:This article makes good points. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Redhat 6.2 (Score:4, Funny)
Re:This article makes good points. (Score:2, Funny)
The pages seem to load faster on the gentoo-wiki than most others though.