x86 Linux Flash Player 9 is Final 288
Schlaegel writes "The official Adobe Linux Flash blog has announced that Flash player for x86 Linux is now final and no longer beta. Every x86 Linux user, at least those willing to load binary software, can rejoice and no longer feel like a second rate citizen. Distribution packages are also available, for example the Macromedia Fedora repository already has the flash player marked for update."
Re:x64_86 (Score:5, Interesting)
Sweet... (Score:3, Interesting)
Besides, it'd be a waste of all that code I wrote for the Evolution extension [rubyforge.org]!
Alternative open source implmentation (Score:5, Interesting)
I think it came installed by default in Firefox last time I installed Ubuntu. Currently doesn't seem to work very well, but the effort is worthwhile, and hopefully the software will improve.
Re:No EULA??? (Score:5, Interesting)
Will it fix the synch problem? (Score:3, Interesting)
If I run VMWare, boot Windows in it and play the videos inside a browser in Windows, the sound IS synchronized...
I always attributed the problem to the GPL flash player I use.
Can anyone else attest to whether or not this will change things?
Take a second look at flash (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:No EULA??? (Score:3, Interesting)
Ok, that section has me completely confused.
So, it looks like from a quick google search that "Web Player" refers to the flash player itself. What I don't get is how in the world a non-PC device is defined. In their examples they mention "Tablet PCs that are not running Windows XP Tablet PC Edition", but a tablet PC running, say, Linux still seems like a PC to me (even has it in the name!). They also mention "internet appliances or other internet-connected devices" which seems pretty broad, and finally they speak of "media centers (excluding Windows XP Media Center Edition and its successors);" if I install MythTV on my PC and hook it up to my TV does it cease being a PC and become a "media center"? I really can't tell what the requiremetents are here.
Re:Just like Windows... (Score:3, Interesting)
I note that this does not disprove your point, in fact if anything it reinforces it - Java was not completely open, and it was this partially closed nature that saved it.