Da Massive writes, "Debian GNU/Linux is experimenting with a new project called Dunc-Tank, which is aimed at securing funding to pay two key release managers — Steve Langasek and Andi Barth — in an effort to ensure the forthcoming Debian 4.0, known as etch, is released on time in December."Dunc-Tank is not affiliated with the Debian Project directly, and in fact was controversial on the debian-private list.
by Anonymous Coward
on Wednesday September 20 2006, @06:50AM (#16144890)
The connection appeared to hang waiting for the stylesheet, so this was only viewable by viewing the HTML source. Obviously relative links are all busted.
What is Dunc?
Basically, Dunc is an experimental project to try out ways of funding
Debian development. Not paying for servers or bandwidth, or reimbursing
expenses and flight costs, but actually paying people to sit down and
do useful Debian work rather than some other day job.
Who is Dunc?
There's info about who exactly is behind Dunc at the board [slashdot.org] page.
Dunc directly supports work on Debian, and is made up of a small group
of people who use Debian and who want to see Debian improve. But Dunc
is not endorsed by Debian, and Debian does not exercise any control over
how Dunc operates.
What about other people funding Debian work?
A number of other groups fund Debian work directly or indirectly,
whether that be by allowing or encouraging their employees to
contribute to Debian, or having Debian work be part of their actual job
description. Dunc does not aim to compete with those groups, either in
the tasks being worked on, or in the people being recruited, but rather
to address other niches in the Debian ecosystem.
What does "Dunc" mean?
Dunc is an acronym standing for "Development Under Numismatic Control"
-- which could equally be called "coin-operated coding". The point of
the project is to try some new possibilities of funding free and open
source software development and helping people work on free software
development on a full-time basis.
Really, though, the name is a reference to the
linux.conf.au [linux.conf.au] auction in 2003, for the t-shirt
signed by the speakers, proceeds from which were directed to Electronic
Frontiers Australia [efa.org.au]. To make the bidding more
lively a certain individual foolishly suggested that the next Debian
release would be named after the winning bidder, should the bidding go
above $2000. Due to the combined resources of a table of inebriated Sun
folks, Duncan Bennet won the bidding, and the right to have his name
associated with the next Debian release -- which, many years later,
turns out to be Debian 4.0, aka etch. So yes, this is yet another free
software project that has its roots in the consumption of a little too
much wine at a conference dinner.
What will the future bring?
As Dunc is an experiment, we don't know what will end up happening
with it. We may decide it works perfectly as is, or that it was a
horrible idea that should never have been tried. In any event, we expect
to review what worked, what didn't, and what should be done over the
course of the first project, and have a public discussion about what to
do after the release of etch.
Random factoid
This site is maintained using Joey Hess's ikiwiki [kitenet.net].
It is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2.
I RTFAed, but I still don't understand exactly how the program is going to work, where the money is going to come from, or what the controversy is about. They call it "coin operated coding," but are they going to let users choose what work their money gets used to fund? So if I want, say, better window transparency, then I can donate $20 and he'll spend 15 or 30 minutes working on that someday? Or is it just the electronic version of one of those "money thermometers" that everyone's seen in front of their lo
I am sure paying these folk will get this Debian release out on time. Money always motivates people to work harder and faster.. and it always makes sure a deadline will be met...
Oh but think about it, if Etch gets released before Vista, Debian (the distro infamous for glacially slow release cycles) will have released three times between the last 2 versions of desktop Windows.
So to all the "Linux sucks on the desktop, Windows pwns all" naysayers, even the slowest-releasing distro is improving at a rate faster than Windows. Say what you like about desktop Linux now, but it's one hell of a fast moving target, and it's only getting better.
No, it's releasing at a rate faster than Windows. There's a difference. release == improvement is a Microsoft fallacy, and using it subjects you to their licensing terms.
No, it's releasing at a rate faster than Windows. There's a difference. release == improvement is a Microsoft fallacy, and using it subjects you to their licensing terms.
You just have got to love how slashdot can spin anything to be Microsoft's fault. Release == improvement is a Mircosoft fallacy, from a company that hasn't had a major OS relase since 2001 and an Office release since 2003? I don't think so. What about the community where distros are often releasing at least once every six months, and where
Dude, but even the latest release of Debian cannot be fairly considered a desktop operating system for the masses. I would figure that Linux desktop has not even reached Windows XP in terms of usability. I run WinXP SP2 with all the updates and I have to say that it's: stable, simpler to use in terms of installing software and hardware, simpler to configure, a more consistent GUI, and better-supported in terms of software. I run ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite, Firefox and run my system behind a cheap SPI
All who disagree with this statement are hardcore nerds who only form a very, very small minority of all computer users in the world.
"hardcore nerds" is a bit of an exaggeration. I recommend and have seen reasonable success in the use of Ubuntu with about 2/3 people who have tried it. These people are not nerds, although they do enjoy exploring computers and alternative software.
They do not have the patience or depth of knowledge that a "hardcore nerd" has, but they still find it interesting/useable and in
You got it wrong. It's not about greed for money becoming a motivator in developing Debian, it's about enabling some release managers to take a holiday from their day jobs and to concentrate full-time on making sure that Etch gets released according to the schedule.
I think this is a good idea. Volunteer developers don't always have enough time for their GNU/Linux work no matter how motivated they are.
But in reading through the "fine" article, I still don't know what the hell "dunc tank" is. (Other than funding for Debian projects.) Anyone care to explain..?
After reading the slashdot writeup and the linked page, I still don't know what they're doing. I know they're trying something new for funding, and I know how it got its name, but I still don't know what new thing it is they're trying. If it was in there, it got buried under a mass of other less important details.
I think it means they are going to raise some funds (how?) to pay some developers directly to work exclusively for some time on Etch. But if so, that's not exactly innovative; other projects have done so before (Perl foundation grants, as one of many examples), and I'm surprised Debian hasn't.
Towns said a new version of X is expected to be included in unstable in the next day or two, which should allow Debian to support some of the compositing techniques that provide similar features to Mac OS X's "Expose".
haven't they frozen the features of Etch yet??? It's awfully short now to December...
The X featureset is pretty close to frozen actually. Xorg 7.2 will release far too close to the Etch release to actually make it in, so 7.1+updates is what will ship with Etch. The only features for X that are still being considered are related to what the article mentioned (XGL, AIGLX, and compiz).
I realize that its common for developers to write barebones HTML 1.0 compliant web pages, but if your asking people for money, you need something that looks a little better than this.. [dunc-tank.org]
If your going to ask for money on a website, have it so people have 1-2 clicks to contribute.. Even if its pledges, have it so the pledges are processed when the project is approved.. Right now they are essentially turning away thousands in contributions, especially with this type of publicity.
This site (Dunc Tank [dunc-tank.org]) has to be the downright worst attempt at fund raising I've ever seen in my life.
The ironic thing is, it's representative of far too many open source documentation projects. Not that anyone in their right mind would think you need documentation for a monatary contribution. Seriously, people don't give a crap abotu wading through a few pages of latex2html just to kick $5 (or $100 for that matter) to a decent project only to find out they need to email some guy and pledge the doe.
Seriously, people don't give a crap abotu wading through a few pages of latex2html just to kick $5 (or $100 for that matter) to a decent project only to find out they need to email some guy and pledge the doe.
It's quite clear you didn't really look at the site. I looked at the home page, clicked the "contribute" link and then found, first sentence of first paragraph:
Dunc is currently waiting on a decision by the SPI board as to whether it will be accepted as an SPI project and donations may be made vi
I realize that its common for developers to write barebones HTML 1.0 compliant web pages, but if your asking people for money, you need something that looks a little better than this.
HTML 1.0 has nothing to do with it. It's just a poor site design.
I've been using Debian for quite some time, and to me the point of Debian is stability. I couldn't give a rat's ass when etch releases as long as it works the way Debian is meant to. Please don't force the release to meet a deadline. You'll only be hurting the users that depend on Debian to be a stable and functional system.
and it lives up to the Debian standard of reliable running, even in testing.
They've got a nice fully functioning gui net installer for etch that worked perfectly for me on a Dell 2300 server with raided SCSI drives. I did a basic LAMP+desktop install. They changed the default sshd install to use keys. (as in public key in ~/.ssh/known_hosts file) Excellent! I'm looking forward to finding more of my usual security tweeks configured as default.
It's testing, so the usual security warnings apply.
I think that there may be a little more sense of urgency at the Debian project with some legitimate competition from deep-pockets Shuttleworth. My etch install suggests they are responding with better product and new ideas to accelerate the development pace.
I've been been bankrupted by my involvement with a free municipal wifi project. For the better part of a year, I've been plugging away at developement, installation, and worst of all, attending endless meetings. The problem is that once you give the consumer (the public, the city, whomever) some free work, and talk about how you really like the open source movement, they think you'll do everything for free. They think that money just grows on trees for you, or that you are living in your parents' basement and content with it. Well, it doesn't work that way. Sure, I put in time and money towards seeing a worthy project get off the ground, but I am not going to carry the whole burden all the way to the projects completion. There needs to be some fundraising, and most especially, a system of paying for specific problems to be worked on.
I've basically dropped all work on the muni wifi project, but there's an effort on to find the next sucker to do some work on it. I doubt it's going to happen - the deadlines are long since missed, and they can't even get volunteers to update and freshen the web page. Cognitive dissonance at work here.
I really hope DUNC-TANK can reach the folks who realize that while there are many contributors, you need a few talented, full-time people to meet deadlines by coordinating efforts and delegating work. These people have real lives, and need to be paid.
Fine balancing act, I guess. Debian has to commit to quality because without that it is nothing - there would be no point in using it. OTOH, there are other pressures, too, not least being seen to run a well-founded ship. Users out there, particularly institutional ones, are bound to have expectations. For example, today the City of Munich announced the latest stage in its Debian rollout, but they likely wouldn't have gone for Debian to begin with if they'd thought its development process was struggling. An
i know the odds of actually winning is very small...
At a physics talk I heard a speaker explain how the chances of winning the lottery are smaller than the chance that a neutron star will pass through our solar sytem close enough to us to capture the earth and pull us away from the sun, thus dooming us to a dark and brief future.
The chance of some CHOSEN ticket (eg 1 2 3 4 5 6) winning is less than a neutron star, but the chance of ANY of the tickets bought in a lottery winning is much larger.
What I'd like to know is what length of time constitutes one "ticket".. the chances of a neutron star coming through in our lifetimes? In a decade? In a year? Per nanosecond?
In addition to what RidiculousPie said, I intentionally left out the part (for dramatic effect, I was trying to be more funny than insightful) about how the neutron scenario probability was a cumulative probability. So over the next many millions of years (I forgot how many) that death by rouge neutron star is more probable than me winning the lottery today.
Personally I hate odds and statistics. Maybe the odds of me winning the lottery are lower than the neutron star but I like to think of everything as 50/50. Either I win or I don't win. I may be stupid for thinking this way, but logically speaking it's correct. It'll either happen or it won't. Now the probability is very slim. If I don't buy a ticket however I have no chance at all. Some chance is better than none. This dunc-tank idea. Do we get to put people from the #debian channel in a dunktank and then w
I like to think of everything as 50/50. Either I win or I don't win.
I propose a simple game with you. You win if a fair die is rolled and comes up 1. I win otherwise. We both put in £1/$1/1 or whatever each time. I will play until you are bankrupt.
Oh but the real odd are on whether I play or not. In that there is a 50/50 chance. So if I play your game I go bankrupt and if I don't play I keep all my money. Everything is 50/50.
While individual rich people can help many by tossing their money at projects, distributed funding methods have proven extremely effective as well. The only problem is that they only tend to work at times of crisis where sometimes it's too late (I'm talking both about non-profit/small businesses as well as natural disasters). An easy way for many people to donate small amounts of money, especially on a monthly basis, might be more reliable... searching google revealed some begging sites though, perhaps Dunc
Depends on what you mean by "logically", I guess. Buying a ticket is logically worth it if a chance to rub your ticket and dream about what you'd do with all that money is worth $1 to you. It's generally not worth it if you calculate the stastical expected value of the ticket (odds of winning multiplied by the probable size of the pot). The expected value of a ticket is nearly always far less than its price, for obvious reasons.
However, there's another angle that may make it more "logical". The argument is that wasting $1 will have essentially zero impact on your quality of life. You could throw a $1 bill in the road every week and probably never notice any change. OTOH, winning the lottery would change your life immensely. So, if you can measure the values in terms of life impact, the $1 ticket has a near-zero cost, and the value of winning is huge, so perhaps the expected value of the ticket exceeds its certain cost.
Personally, I think that's crap. The value of $1 per week, if saved and invested over years, is decidedly non-trivial, so the argument can only work if you accept as a given your inability to save money.
It's the people who buy more than $1 that I can't really understand.
Why? I see three reasons to buy lottery tickets:
First, because the statistical expected value of the ticket exceeds its cost. This can happen when the pots get really big. In that case, there are lots of appropriate strategies, depending upon your available funds, but pretty much all of them would suggest buying more than one ticket.
Second, because you buy the low-impact/high-reward argument, and your perceived expected value is higher than your perceived cost. In that case the logical approach is to buy as many lottery tickets as will have no discernable effect on your finances. Perhaps you make and spend exactly the right amount of money so that $1 is that threshold, but it's more likely that the painless amount is higher or lower.
Third, because you like to dream, and like the excitement of having a chance. In that case, since you're basically spending money for entertainment, you just have to decide how many tickets give you the best bang for your buck. Most people would probably say one ticket, but a book of 50 really makes a nice slapping sound in your hand, so YMMV.
Personally, I can dream about what I'd do with millions of dollars without buying a ticket at all, so that's my strategy. Sure, I have no chance of winning the millions, but buying a ticket only changes that by a miniscule amount, and the buck can sit in the bank and gather interest.
You're missing another important aspect of the lottery in your reasoning. The money made from the lottery goes back to the cities. So it's not just $1 wasted, it's $1 contributed to the city (minus the operating expenses of course).
I'm not missing that at all. The city gets plenty of my money. If I want to donate $1 to a good cause (and I donate lots of dollars to good causes), I wouldn't give it to them.
While you're dollar sits in the bank, the $5 I spend per year on playing the lottery (when jackp
Buying a single ticket is logically worth it, especially if picking numbers that will have a higher return (less likely to have multiple winners).
Yes, people often use birthdates. That means 1-12 > 13-30 > 31 > 31+. Many people also use patterns on the lottery ticket, another bad idea. But not nearly enough to create arbitrage.
$1 for a chance to win huge!
It might be "worth it", but not it terms of expected payoff which is mathematical answer. Then again, life is about more than accumulating wealth.
Personally I think things are perfect the way they are in the Debian and Ubuntu Camps. I use both, Ubuntu on my desktop and Debian on my servers. They both have their place and they both do their jobs well. If anything the Ubuntu people should have called themselves Desktop Debian or something. Debian developers shouldn't hang it up. They are already working on Ubuntu directly. Ubuntu just takes their work and adds a little to it.
Personally I think the Debian people should just hang it up and start working on Ubuntu.
The Debian people are working on Ubuntu. And Knoppix. And <insert favorite Debian-derived distro here>.
If the *thousands* of Debian developers stopped doing what they're doing, Ubuntu would grind to a halt. So far Mark Shuttleworth has spent nearly $20M on Ubuntu, and all of that money has accomplished relatively little, from a purely technical perspective. What's great about Canonical's efforts is that what they've done has been focused on polishing the bits needed to make the non-developer's user experience better -- the bits that many (not all) developers tend to be less interested in.
Ubuntu isn't structured to manage the participation of thousands of active developers working on a dozen platforms. If Ubuntu were to restructure to meet that goal, (1) growing pains would cripple the project for a good long while and (2) the result would look a lot like Debian.
IMO, the status quo is better. Ubuntu takes a raw diamond and cuts and polishes it while Debian is busy squeezing carbon deposits into diamond.
BTW, I'm a Debian user, and a software developer, but not a Debian developer. I've tried Ubuntu a couple of times, but always found it to be lacking in software packages I need. I can pull those packages from Debian, of course, but there are always little issues with that, so I find it easier to stick with pure Debian (sid on my desktop, testing on my family's desktops and stable on my servers).
always found it to be lacking in software packages I need. I can pull those packages from Debian
May I ask which packages these were? AFAICT Ubuntu includes nearly the complete Debian repo if you enable the universe and multiverse repositories which are off by default.
AFAIK, the problem is that those packages are designed to work with Debian, not Ubuntu, so you end up with more problems than you'd have if you just ran Debian sid.
Personally, I feel that Ubuntu is sort of a Debian for Beginners. As soon as you're no longer a beginner, Debian proper is probably a better option. That said, I still recommend Ubuntu to people who I know are beginners.
AFAIK, the problem is that those packages are designed to work with Debian, not Ubuntu
I don't know what you mean with "those", if you mean the Ubuntu universe and multiverse repos then you know wrong - those are recompiled for Ubuntu and work (but are unsupported).
I use Debian for ? 11 years or something and have worked as a Debian sysadmin.... Again IMHO, using Debian involves an unnecessary amount of effort just to get it running, simply because the mentality is that the system must be shiped naked with no configuration choices made
Wow. I've only been a Debian user for 5 years, some of that time as an admin.
I use Debian precisely because it saves me from having to configure stuff. I had a need to start developing with Zope the other day, I didn't have to edit a single.conf file to get it up and running - apt did everything for me.
Packages like gforge are utterly remarkable. The debian apt installer scripts ask you basic questions and will setup/configure/create (dbs, tables, domains, user accounts, etc) for every dependency: OpenLDAP, PostgreSQL, Exim, Apache... a fully working and configured system without touching a single configuration file.
For admin/dev stuff, Debian is remarkable. For the Desktop, you have to do some fiddling to get the final 1% functionality, but that's no problem for me. If a noob doesn't want to remember to install nm-applet to get a nice WLAN configuration applet, or which xmodmap commands will make his/her multimedia keys work - then Ubuntu is great.
Sure. I don't remember what they were, though. I use lots of different packages, installing and uninstalling frequently, and it just seems that every time I try Ubuntu I run into stuff that isn't there, even with multiverse and universe enabled.
Another issue is that Ubuntu's 6-month release cycle means that an Ubuntu system is less up to date than a Debian sid system. That usually doesn't matter, but sometimes it's important.
One way... (Score:2, Interesting)
Couldn't they ask for donations as well? I remember on of the other distro's doing this (was it Mandrake?).
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Direct link... (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
This is what I got (Score:4, Informative)
Basically, Dunc is an experimental project to try out ways of funding Debian development. Not paying for servers or bandwidth, or reimbursing expenses and flight costs, but actually paying people to sit down and do useful Debian work rather than some other day job.
Who is Dunc?There's info about who exactly is behind Dunc at the board [slashdot.org] page.
Dunc directly supports work on Debian, and is made up of a small group of people who use Debian and who want to see Debian improve. But Dunc is not endorsed by Debian, and Debian does not exercise any control over how Dunc operates.
What about other people funding Debian work?A number of other groups fund Debian work directly or indirectly, whether that be by allowing or encouraging their employees to contribute to Debian, or having Debian work be part of their actual job description. Dunc does not aim to compete with those groups, either in the tasks being worked on, or in the people being recruited, but rather to address other niches in the Debian ecosystem.
What does "Dunc" mean?Dunc is an acronym standing for "Development Under Numismatic Control" -- which could equally be called "coin-operated coding". The point of the project is to try some new possibilities of funding free and open source software development and helping people work on free software development on a full-time basis.
Really, though, the name is a reference to the linux.conf.au [linux.conf.au] auction in 2003, for the t-shirt signed by the speakers, proceeds from which were directed to Electronic Frontiers Australia [efa.org.au]. To make the bidding more lively a certain individual foolishly suggested that the next Debian release would be named after the winning bidder, should the bidding go above $2000. Due to the combined resources of a table of inebriated Sun folks, Duncan Bennet won the bidding, and the right to have his name associated with the next Debian release -- which, many years later, turns out to be Debian 4.0, aka etch. So yes, this is yet another free software project that has its roots in the consumption of a little too much wine at a conference dinner.
What will the future bring?As Dunc is an experiment, we don't know what will end up happening with it. We may decide it works perfectly as is, or that it was a horrible idea that should never have been tried. In any event, we expect to review what worked, what didn't, and what should be done over the course of the first project, and have a public discussion about what to do after the release of etch.
Random factoidThis site is maintained using Joey Hess's ikiwiki [kitenet.net].
It is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2.
How does it work? (Score:3, Insightful)
They call it "coin operated coding," but are they going to let users choose what work their money gets used to fund? So if I want, say, better window transparency, then I can donate $20 and he'll spend 15 or 30 minutes working on that someday? Or is it just the electronic version of one of those "money thermometers" that everyone's seen in front of their lo
Oddly appropriate. (Score:2)
Vista anyone? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Vista anyone? (Score:5, Interesting)
So to all the "Linux sucks on the desktop, Windows pwns all" naysayers, even the slowest-releasing distro is improving at a rate faster than Windows. Say what you like about desktop Linux now, but it's one hell of a fast moving target, and it's only getting better.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
You just have got to love how slashdot can spin anything to be Microsoft's fault. Release == improvement is a Mircosoft fallacy, from a company that hasn't had a major OS relase since 2001 and an Office release since 2003? I don't think so. What about the community where distros are often releasing at least once every six months, and where
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"hardcore nerds" is a bit of an exaggeration. I recommend and have seen reasonable success in the use of Ubuntu with about 2/3 people who have tried it. These people are not nerds, although they do enjoy exploring computers and alternative software.
They do not have the patience or depth of knowledge that a "hardcore nerd" has, but they still find it interesting/useable and in
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You got it wrong. It's not about greed for money becoming a motivator in developing Debian, it's about enabling some release managers to take a holiday from their day jobs and to concentrate full-time on making sure that Etch gets released according to the schedule.
I think this is a good idea. Volunteer developers don't always have enough time for their GNU/Linux work no matter how motivated they are.
Maybe I need caffiene .. (Score:2)
So what is it? (Score:4, Insightful)
After reading the slashdot writeup and the linked page, I still don't know what they're doing. I know they're trying something new for funding, and I know how it got its name, but I still don't know what new thing it is they're trying. If it was in there, it got buried under a mass of other less important details.
I think it means they are going to raise some funds (how?) to pay some developers directly to work exclusively for some time on Etch. But if so, that's not exactly innovative; other projects have done so before (Perl foundation grants, as one of many examples), and I'm surprised Debian hasn't.
oh oh... (Score:3, Funny)
haven't they frozen the features of Etch yet??? It's awfully short now to December...
Re: (Score:2)
website design please (Score:3, Insightful)
If your going to ask for money on a website, have it so people have 1-2 clicks to contribute.. Even if its pledges, have it so the pledges are processed when the project is approved.. Right now they are essentially turning away thousands in contributions, especially with this type of publicity.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This site (Dunc Tank [dunc-tank.org]) has to be the downright worst attempt at fund raising I've ever seen in my life.
The ironic thing is, it's representative of far too many open source documentation projects. Not that anyone in their right mind would think you need documentation for a monatary contribution. Seriously, people don't give a crap abotu wading through a few pages of latex2html just to kick $5 (or $100 for that matter) to a decent project only to find out they need to email some guy and pledge the doe.
Here'
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Seriously, people don't give a crap abotu wading through a few pages of latex2html just to kick $5 (or $100 for that matter) to a decent project only to find out they need to email some guy and pledge the doe.
It's quite clear you didn't really look at the site. I looked at the home page, clicked the "contribute" link and then found, first sentence of first paragraph:
Re: (Score:2)
HTML 1.0 has nothing to do with it. It's just a poor site design.
Uhm, no? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Etch Installed This Week... (Score:3, Insightful)
They've got a nice fully functioning gui net installer for etch that worked perfectly for me on a Dell 2300 server with raided SCSI drives. I did a basic LAMP+desktop install. They changed the default sshd install to use keys. (as in public key in ~/.ssh/known_hosts file) Excellent! I'm looking forward to finding more of my usual security tweeks configured as default.
It's testing, so the usual security warnings apply.
I think that there may be a little more sense of urgency at the Debian project with some legitimate competition from deep-pockets Shuttleworth. My etch install suggests they are responding with better product and new ideas to accelerate the development pace.
Install it today! http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ [debian.org]
People are CHEAP (Score:3, Insightful)
I've been been bankrupted by my involvement with a free municipal wifi project. For the better part of a year, I've been plugging away at developement, installation, and worst of all, attending endless meetings. The problem is that once you give the consumer (the public, the city, whomever) some free work, and talk about how you really like the open source movement, they think you'll do everything for free. They think that money just grows on trees for you, or that you are living in your parents' basement and content with it. Well, it doesn't work that way. Sure, I put in time and money towards seeing a worthy project get off the ground, but I am not going to carry the whole burden all the way to the projects completion. There needs to be some fundraising, and most especially, a system of paying for specific problems to be worked on.
I've basically dropped all work on the muni wifi project, but there's an effort on to find the next sucker to do some work on it. I doubt it's going to happen - the deadlines are long since missed, and they can't even get volunteers to update and freshen the web page. Cognitive dissonance at work here.
I really hope DUNC-TANK can reach the folks who realize that while there are many contributors, you need a few talented, full-time people to meet deadlines by coordinating efforts and delegating work. These people have real lives, and need to be paid.
Hey Buddy, can you spare a deb? (Score:2)
Re:if i win big (Score:4, Insightful)
At a physics talk I heard a speaker explain how the chances of winning the lottery are smaller than the chance that a neutron star will pass through our solar sytem close enough to us to capture the earth and pull us away from the sun, thus dooming us to a dark and brief future.
I play sometimes too...
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Lottery odds vs Neutron stars (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I propose a simple game with you. You win if a fair die is rolled and comes up 1. I win otherwise. We both put in £1/$1/1 or whatever each time. I will play until you are bankrupt.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:if i win big (Score:4, Insightful)
Buying a single ticket is logically worth it
Depends on what you mean by "logically", I guess. Buying a ticket is logically worth it if a chance to rub your ticket and dream about what you'd do with all that money is worth $1 to you. It's generally not worth it if you calculate the stastical expected value of the ticket (odds of winning multiplied by the probable size of the pot). The expected value of a ticket is nearly always far less than its price, for obvious reasons.
However, there's another angle that may make it more "logical". The argument is that wasting $1 will have essentially zero impact on your quality of life. You could throw a $1 bill in the road every week and probably never notice any change. OTOH, winning the lottery would change your life immensely. So, if you can measure the values in terms of life impact, the $1 ticket has a near-zero cost, and the value of winning is huge, so perhaps the expected value of the ticket exceeds its certain cost.
Personally, I think that's crap. The value of $1 per week, if saved and invested over years, is decidedly non-trivial, so the argument can only work if you accept as a given your inability to save money.
It's the people who buy more than $1 that I can't really understand.
Why? I see three reasons to buy lottery tickets:
First, because the statistical expected value of the ticket exceeds its cost. This can happen when the pots get really big. In that case, there are lots of appropriate strategies, depending upon your available funds, but pretty much all of them would suggest buying more than one ticket.
Second, because you buy the low-impact/high-reward argument, and your perceived expected value is higher than your perceived cost. In that case the logical approach is to buy as many lottery tickets as will have no discernable effect on your finances. Perhaps you make and spend exactly the right amount of money so that $1 is that threshold, but it's more likely that the painless amount is higher or lower.
Third, because you like to dream, and like the excitement of having a chance. In that case, since you're basically spending money for entertainment, you just have to decide how many tickets give you the best bang for your buck. Most people would probably say one ticket, but a book of 50 really makes a nice slapping sound in your hand, so YMMV.
Personally, I can dream about what I'd do with millions of dollars without buying a ticket at all, so that's my strategy. Sure, I have no chance of winning the millions, but buying a ticket only changes that by a miniscule amount, and the buck can sit in the bank and gather interest.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
You're missing another important aspect of the lottery in your reasoning. The money made from the lottery goes back to the cities. So it's not just $1 wasted, it's $1 contributed to the city (minus the operating expenses of course).
I'm not missing that at all. The city gets plenty of my money. If I want to donate $1 to a good cause (and I donate lots of dollars to good causes), I wouldn't give it to them.
While you're dollar sits in the bank, the $5 I spend per year on playing the lottery (when jackp
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, people often use birthdates. That means 1-12 > 13-30 > 31 > 31+. Many people also use patterns on the lottery ticket, another bad idea. But not nearly enough to create arbitrage.
$1 for a chance to win huge!
It might be "worth it", but not it terms of expected payoff which is mathematical answer. Then again, life is about more than accumulating wealth.
Re:The solution.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:The solution.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Personally I think the Debian people should just hang it up and start working on Ubuntu.
The Debian people are working on Ubuntu. And Knoppix. And <insert favorite Debian-derived distro here>.
If the *thousands* of Debian developers stopped doing what they're doing, Ubuntu would grind to a halt. So far Mark Shuttleworth has spent nearly $20M on Ubuntu, and all of that money has accomplished relatively little, from a purely technical perspective. What's great about Canonical's efforts is that what they've done has been focused on polishing the bits needed to make the non-developer's user experience better -- the bits that many (not all) developers tend to be less interested in.
Ubuntu isn't structured to manage the participation of thousands of active developers working on a dozen platforms. If Ubuntu were to restructure to meet that goal, (1) growing pains would cripple the project for a good long while and (2) the result would look a lot like Debian.
IMO, the status quo is better. Ubuntu takes a raw diamond and cuts and polishes it while Debian is busy squeezing carbon deposits into diamond.
BTW, I'm a Debian user, and a software developer, but not a Debian developer. I've tried Ubuntu a couple of times, but always found it to be lacking in software packages I need. I can pull those packages from Debian, of course, but there are always little issues with that, so I find it easier to stick with pure Debian (sid on my desktop, testing on my family's desktops and stable on my servers).
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
May I ask which packages these were? AFAICT Ubuntu includes nearly the complete Debian repo if you enable the universe and multiverse repositories which are off by default.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
AFAIK, the problem is that those packages are designed to work with Debian, not Ubuntu, so you end up with more problems than you'd have if you just ran Debian sid.
Personally, I feel that Ubuntu is sort of a Debian for Beginners. As soon as you're no longer a beginner, Debian proper is probably a better option. That said, I still recommend Ubuntu to people who I know are beginners.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know what you mean with "those", if you mean the Ubuntu universe and multiverse repos then you know wrong - those are recompiled for Ubuntu and work (but are unsupported).
Re:The solution.... (Score:4, Interesting)
Again IMHO, using Debian involves an unnecessary amount of effort just to get it running, simply because the mentality is that the system must be shiped naked with no configuration choices made
Wow. I've only been a Debian user for 5 years, some of that time as an admin.
I use Debian precisely because it saves me from having to configure stuff. I had a need to start developing with Zope the other day, I didn't have to edit a single
Packages like gforge are utterly remarkable. The debian apt installer scripts ask you basic questions and will setup/configure/create (dbs, tables, domains, user accounts, etc) for every dependency: OpenLDAP, PostgreSQL, Exim, Apache... a fully working and configured system without touching a single configuration file.
For admin/dev stuff, Debian is remarkable. For the Desktop, you have to do some fiddling to get the final 1% functionality, but that's no problem for me. If a noob doesn't want to remember to install nm-applet to get a nice WLAN configuration applet, or which xmodmap commands will make his/her multimedia keys work - then Ubuntu is great.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
May I ask which packages these were?
Sure. I don't remember what they were, though. I use lots of different packages, installing and uninstalling frequently, and it just seems that every time I try Ubuntu I run into stuff that isn't there, even with multiverse and universe enabled.
Another issue is that Ubuntu's 6-month release cycle means that an Ubuntu system is less up to date than a Debian sid system. That usually doesn't matter, but sometimes it's important.
I also use stuff that Debian doesn't
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)