Novell Makes Public Release of Xgl Code 339
hamfactorial writes "Novell has announced the public availability of the Xgl code, an openGL accelerated X server layer. Available binaries ought to be coming soon for distributions running the modular X.org 7.0 release (possibly 6.9, though unconfirmed). A temporary page for Xgl information is up at the openSUSE website. This is the same code that was running in the Novell Linux Desktop 10 preview videos as seen earlier. Further information is also available at Miguel De Icaza's blog."
Re:Videos? (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.novell.com/linux/xglrelease/ [novell.com]
A little preemptive. (Score:5, Informative)
Which is Feb, 8th at 10am PST. [x.org]. Also the XGL code has been available for some time. Browse the CVS [freedesktop.org]. I'm somewhat expecting an update of the code tomorrow too.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Informative)
No, actually not. The rendering presented in the video does not need a 7800. This is basic 3D rendering most on-board graphics chipsets can handle. This functionality has been around for a decade in consumer cards.
Re:Finally! (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Is this mean, I can finally enable Composite? (Score:2, Informative)
It is a bit more complicated than that. Xgl doesn't work all by itself - it relies on having a working OpenGL enviroment. In this case - Xorg. So you run Xgl on top of Xorg and Xgl implements RENDER and GLX, by passing relevant calls to the OpenGL system of the underlying Xserver. COMPOSITE is also turned on by default in Xgl, but it does NOT use the underlying server's COMPOSITE.
It will take some time until all this is finally merged into Xorg and we have an OpenGL-accelerated desktop without the need of running 2 Xservers, but for the time being, if you want (somewhat) stable COMPOSITE with GLX, this is the only way.
nothing but impressed (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Finally! (Score:3, Informative)
I mean, at least Planet Penguin Racer (ex-Tuxracer) seemed to work fine, 3D acceleration and all..! :P
Finally! (Score:3, Informative)
I've been waiting a long time for this. And this [gnome.org], and this [beaglewiki.org], and this [nat.org].
I'd sure like to see 3d GTK+ widgets and window decoration, all following the same global illumination, complete with specular maps [3dtotal.com] and all the advanced pixel shader techniques available the desktop could become truly beautiful.
Re:What kind of hardware is used? (Score:2, Informative)
That's odd. What card(s)/motherboard(s)/kernel version(s)/nVidia driver version(s)?
They've always been perfectly stable with my GeForce 4 MX and GeForce FX 5700. A motherboard with Via AGP and an nForce 2 motherboard (all nVidia chipsets, nVidia AGP etc). Stable on Arch Linux, Gentoo Linux, kernels compiled with GCC 3.3.x, 3.4.x, and now 4.1 beta, and stable with both the kernel's AGP driver and the nVidia driver's built in driver.
The only trouble I remember was console framebuffer not working on the 4 MX, and nVidia drivers at the time (not a problem now) not being compatible with the 4K stacks option introduced in kernel 2.6.6.
Here's a good place for nVidia Linux driver help:
NVIDIA Linux Forum @ NVnews.net [nvnews.net]
Re:Window manager land (Score:5, Informative)
You understand incorrectly. Compiz is both a window manager and a compositing manager. There were technical reasons as to why it was done this way. Metacity will also be incorporating composite code directly rather than have a separate userspace process.
Re:OMG XINERAMA PLEASE! (Score:3, Informative)
Not to take anything away from the movie...
Re:Debian (Score:3, Informative)
Clearly this is contradictory. If you "can't wait" until it hist Debian stable then you are looking for a release which is less stable than Debian stable.
The reality is, of course much simpler. Odds are that given it's optional "runs on top of Xorg" nature it will be available in Debian testing within 3 months and will consequently be released next time the 16000 or so Debian packages are declared stable enough for a release.
</TrollFodder>
Re:Is this mean, I can finally enable Composite? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Finally! (Score:2, Informative)
desktop cube: old idea (Score:2, Informative)
Actually, something similar has been available at least since 2002: http://desk3d.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]
It's still cool of course, and it probably works much better with Xgl.
Re:Finally! (Score:2, Informative)
Oh yeah, while I'm idly wondering, what are the odds of this making it into mainstream desktops ( stock gnome/kde )?
Well, to some extent it's already there: KWin uses COMPOSITE to do translucency and shadows, for example.
There are plans to extend use of these features in KDE 4. Zack Rusin from KDE, has been working on this sort of thing (you can see an interview with him from the Summer [ox.ac.uk]). There's also the Plasma [kde.org] project, which has beauty and usability as its key aims built in from the start.
And best of all, you can get involved [kde.org] and help make KDE 4 the best ever!
Re:Debian (Score:3, Informative)
It's just that their choice of names is a tad misleading.
Re:Window manager land (Score:3, Informative)
No.
Only Compiz; the different compositors are not feature compatible.
No.
Yes.
No.
No.
Too late.
Re:Is this mean, I can finally enable Composite? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:That's not progress (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Eye candy can make sense (Score:5, Informative)
1. Map your Exposé functions to the screen corners from the "Dashboard and Exposé" option in System Preferences. I've got the following mapped: Top-Left-Application-Windows, Top-Right-All-Windows, Bottom-Left-Start-Screen-Saver, Bottom-Right-Desktop. Its way faster than having to hunt out F9-12 between mouse movements.
2. Make better use of Command-H to hide an app and its associated windows instead of iconizing. It keeps the dock from getting cluttered up
3. If things are getting too busy on the desktop use Option-Command-H to hide all the other apps except the one you're working on. Instant clarity.
4. Remember that you can bring an app (and all its associated windows) to the foreground by clicking the app icon in the dock.
As a serious user who's been using Mac OS X for 3-4 years now, full time, for both work and home I can tell you that the OSX desktop does not get in the way if you make full use of the available features. On the contrary, its a pleasure to use.
Re:competing with cairo? (Score:2, Informative)