The Most Desired Linux Ports 320
zenboomerang writes "It looks like Novell is trying to hit the hammer on the top of software developers heads and try and get them to port their applications directly to Linux. With help from the public they will try to pursuade the management of the most popular programs picked to get into the 21st Century and do some Linux testing. It seems to me to be a good idea and all it needs is a little help from the community."
Automatic slashdotting (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Only one I really need (Score:3, Informative)
Thinking to buy out CodeWeavers? (Score:4, Informative)
Ximian was a small outfit and Novell bought them out, maybe they're considering a similar move with CodeWeavers?
In any case, for comparison here's a list [codeweavers.com] of top most wanted apps for Crossover to support next.
Re:Of that List... (Score:5, Informative)
Visio (Score:4, Informative)
Dia http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/ [gnome.org] as replacement works for me. Windows port available.
Hey Microsoft
Enjoy,
Re:Port photoshop (Score:4, Informative)
I'm sure things are getting better, but the latest version of Photoshop only runs in Mac OS X 10.2 (2002) or later, and is "recommended" for use on 10.3 (2003) or 10.4 (2005) only. I've seen a lot of "System Requirements" for Mac software that explicitly require later versions of the OS. I suspect the APIs have stabilizied greatly across the past few versions.
Re:Port photoshop (Score:4, Informative)
The GIMP is cool, don't get me wrong but Photoshop based houses will only run Photoshop.
The day that it is ported to Linux is the day that these houses will start looking at Linux on the desktop.
LK
For Chemists... (Score:2, Informative)
1) Chemdraw
2) SciFinder
3) Endnote ported to work for OpenOffice,ODF under Linux
SciFinder can be tortured into working under wine, but it would be nice if it would work natively. Especially since a lot of the people who use it are physicists/physical chemists who do use *nix.
LaTeX or RevTeX (with BibTeX) are pretty sweet and most journals will accept one or the other, until you need to colaborate with someone on a paper and then a plain text file with backslashes and braces everywhere suddenly becomes extreamly confusing, (try to explain that \begin{equation} \exp(x)=e^x \end{equation} will look just fine once it's been processed to someone who doesn't realize that there are alternatives to wysiwyg) so some way to interoperate with the MS addicts and still conveniently insert references would be nice.
Finally, the FOSS offerings for drawing chemical structures are pretty pathetic compared to ChemDraw. Cactvs and XDrawchem are a nice start, but that's all they are ... a start. For crying out loud, they have an OSX version ... so they're about 75% of the way there already.
So, from my particular niche, that's what I'd like. Another option would be to port a useful free equation editor to MS office, then I might almost be tempted to try windows again.
Re:Interesting (Score:3, Informative)
Worked for me (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Port photoshop (Score:3, Informative)
If you want more information then the gimp user [gimp.org] mailing list is the best place for it, and they'll tell you what you want to hear.
Re:Finale (Score:3, Informative)
Different strokes, I guess. Lilypond's superiority (to me, at least) over Finale and Sibelius was one of the things that pulled me away from the Dark Side. I could never get braces quite right on Finale and they just work with lilypond.
Have you tried denemo? It's a really nice GUI front end to lilypond, with the added benefit that when the morendo isn't stretching out exactly right you can just edit the markup to make it do exactly what you want.
Re:My List of Apps I'd Like to see on Linux... (Score:3, Informative)
DreamWeaver? Hire a web designer. There are web development tools for Linux, and there are web-based development tools for anything with a decent browser, but honestly, if what you're doing requires something as complex as DreamWeaver, it really requires a professional web developer comfortable with Linux and Vim.
I have no idea what InDesign is or what it really does, so I'll give you that one.
Timbuktu -- did you TRY to Google? SSH has been around for years, and it'll do X11 forwarding. There's also VNC, which has plenty of decent Windows clients. And there's rdesktop, for connecting to Windows remote desktops. It would take a lot of trickery to show only part of your screen, but is that a big issue for you? Or anyone? I would hide things on another workspace if I didn't want to show the whole desktop.
Netmeeting -- again, are you serious? Ok, there is GnomeMeeting to connect to actual Netmeeting, but there are so many replacements it's ludicrous. Normal IM has webcam support, and there's a program that does this. And let's not forget Skype.
Outlook -- Thunderbird and Sunbird. Yes, you can make this work easily enough in Sunbird, if you know how to run a webserver. Is it stable yet? I've only had one bug, and that's been fixed already... No crashes...
In short, ask Google before you ask Slashdot. Google won't insult you for not knowing something.
Re:Lotus Notes (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Port photoshop (Score:2, Informative)
They use Linux right now, but it's a pain in the ass to dualboot each time they need something from Photoshop. With CrossOver I've seen many of them use Linux without restart for weeks, but seriusly, a native version it's needed.
Re:Of that List... (Score:3, Informative)
Au contraire — Lotus Notes was indeed available in a "Unix" version; this existed up to release 4.5 or so. They dropped the port beginning with R5. No great loss — I recall a company running it on Solaris machines and being fairly unhappy with it; it definitely lagged the Windows and OS/2 versions of that time in usability.
It is possible to get the Windows binaries running under WINE or Crossover; I understand that is how Linux diehards in IBM tend to use it. But as others have posted, the IBM plan is to offer Notes functionality as a plugin to the Eclipse-based IBM Workplace.
And just to set you straight - the Notes client has never been particularly "Java based" — it provides Java APIs but as far as I know it is and always has been largely a C/C++ program.
Nedit (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Port AOL (Score:3, Informative)