Run Linux as a Windows Screensaver 259
zornorph writes "A software engineer at IBM has come up with a way to 'construct and package a Linux® LiveCD so that it will install using the standard Microsoft® Windows® install process and will operate as a standard Windows screensaver.'"
Or you could not (Score:1, Informative)
The word for the (first?) post is: oppose
RTFA Please! (Score:5, Informative)
Still, it's a very interesting story!
Screen Saver Fun (Score:2, Informative)
uh what? (Score:1, Informative)
having made several screen savers for windows several years ago, i know that a screen saver is simply* an EXE renamed to a SCR file and put in the windows\system directory.
wtf is this article talking about?
(*it is also passed different command line arguments so you know if its being run, previewed, or the settings button is being pressed, and some other stuff)
Re:Screen Saver Fun (Score:3, Informative)
Why? (Score:2, Informative)
Of course running Linux on Windows is similar to driving a BMW around inside of a Triumph.
Re:Maybe there is a point... (Score:4, Informative)
If this were Cooperative Linux [colinux.org] that might be an avenue worth exploring. However, the article describes running Linux under QEMU, which the author admits is "slooooooooowwww."
Re:A screensaver.. or not? (Score:5, Informative)
Not really. Windows screensavers are just executables with the file extension changed to
Already exists! (Score:5, Informative)
So, is it that LordDavon (yes, me!) is just a john-q-public open source developer and doesn't matter... but if Big Blue does something similar they matter!? Is it that Dynamism is supporting andLinux and not IBM? I really am a bit pissed on this one! I really believed that Slashdot would want to promote a project made for the public, by the public. I guess I need to try and make money off of Linux for them to care.
Honestly, I just don't know. What I do know is that I don't need a screensaver to run Linux in Windows, I was first and Slashdot and IBM can kiss my ass!
Re:Why not stand-alone? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:What a pain® (Score:3, Informative)
But in general, I don't think excessive use of trademark symbols helps anyone. Use it once per term per document, at most, and put in a footnote about all trademarks being the property of their respective owners. More than that gets on my nerves.
Re:A screensaver.. or not? (Score:1, Informative)