Shuttleworth on Ubuntu's Direction and Intent 242
cj2003 writes "Mark Shuttleworth has released a FAQ about Ubuntu's Direction and Intent. It comments on the discussions of funding, of being a Debian-fork or not, of the strange names, and many other 'hot topics' relating to Ubuntu. In his own words: 'This document exists to give the community some insight into my thinking, and to a certain extent that of the Community Council, Technical Board and other governance structures - on some of the issues and decisions that have been controversial.'"
Re:Professional Addition (Score:3, Informative)
In fact, the original meaning of "computer" was a person who did math calculations for a living.
Re:Propietary Software Industry (Score:3, Informative)
See here [slashdot.org].
Trend: Products (before) -> Services (after)
Re:I disagree. (Score:5, Informative)
Come on now, XP Pro has, what, Active Directory/Windows Domain/whatever-else-Microsoft-tried-to-replace-LD AP-with support? A nice GUI for managing NTFS ACLs which you can manipulated in XP Home with cacls? As far as I know, Pro is only really useful if you're managing a large gaggle of Windows boxes. For instance, at home I run all my network services under Linux. I've a few boxes dual-booting with XP Home, and one with XP Pro. Pro sees no benefits whatsoever in this environment; it's no more stable, functional or secure.
Re:Propietary Software Industry (Score:3, Informative)
but a tiny, miniscule amount of that software ends up packaged on store shelf.
Grumpy Groundhog info (Score:5, Informative)
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GrumpyGroundhog [ubuntu.com]
It's an ubuntu distribution for developers that has the daily builds of everything:
Re:Propietary Software Industry (Score:5, Informative)
Don't forget the third option: I work for a company that produces software that is licensed to hardware manufacturers who then ship actual devices. Mobile phones, in my case. The software is never sold directly to the primary users of the software.
I suspect there's a hell of lot of this going on, too.
use rdesktop for windows (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Money Talks (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I disagree. (Score:4, Informative)
compmgmt.msc
I'm not positive, but I don't think either of those extremely useful utilities are in XP Home. (Can anyone confirm?)
The crux of the article... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I disagree. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Money Talks (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I disagree. (Score:5, Informative)
When XP came out, the logic was that anyone on 98/ME could move to XP Home, while XP Pro was for those who needed 'that weird esoteric enterprise stuff' that was only in windows 2000 professional.
So when all these users got their new laptops and desktops with xp home preinstalled it was a pretty rude awakening that MS had actually removed the webserver and disabled the ability to connect to a domain entirely.
It wasn't simply that Home was a watered down version of XP Pro (people were pretty much expecting that)...in some significant respects it was a waterned down version of 98!!! "Upgrading" from 98 to Home actually removed 2 pretty major features.
A lot of hobbyists, tele-communters, home-based web developers, power users, savvy gamers, and so forth got burnt by Home Edition. It was aggravated by the price difference, and the fact that many system builders didn't offer XP as an option in their more home-consumer targeted products... yet many "home consumers" needed XP Pro, but had no reason to pay 60% more for an 'enterprise workstation model of pc/laptop'
Additionally the watered down security model, the lack of support for encryption (what?! Home users don't need privacy??) and limiting users to the "Microsoft Way" of setting up shared folders etc (hiding all the details where users literally could not meaningfully get to them -- yet all the details were there for misbehaving software to bungle up) was a real disservice to consumers.
Finally the loss of remote desktop, has saved the day for countless thousands as more clued friends family are able to solve their problems. (Sure home comes with remote assistance which is much much much clumsier and more of a pain to setup, especially when all parties are behind NAT boxes. Getting RD up and running is a few checkboxes and an easy nat/firewall tweak...)
Home solidly deserves its reputation for being crippled.
Unstable: Perfect Storm (Score:4, Informative)
Once these are over, Debian Unstable will be its usual not-really-unstable self.
Re:Moving from RedHat/Fedora to Ubuntu? (Score:1, Informative)
* Centralized resources: Everything is one spot. You say that you use 'public' repositories. Almost all of the packages that you could ever want are available within the Ubuntu ecosystem. Fedora Core uses yum and I preferred apt-4-rpm. Some repos support apt4rpm, some do not. I do not know what the case is now. APT is much faster and mature than yum. Also, you may run into trouble with mixing repos with Fedora Core. Everyone doesnt package apps uniformly.
* Superior hardware detection: Developers test, improve and fix alot of thingsand as a result, more functions work out-of-the-box. The latest development release automatically configured many items I could'nt get working with Fedora Core. Examples: Processor Speed Scaling (P4 mobile), the laptop Function keys for display dimming, volume, CD eject, etc. YMMV with wireless.
* Community: The best community ever. Nice people that help anyone out. Everyone is welcomed. From power-users to noobs. Server, Desktop, Gaming, programmers. Everyone is welcomed. Less corporate politics and leet-ness with user contributions. I will admit that I still use Debian Sarge for servers.
* Vision and milestones: Criticise if you like, but Mark Shuttleworth has a great vision of what he wants to accomplish with the distro. He gives so much back to education and people. Everything also happens in the public.
If you want a stable Linux distro based on Debian with a great selection of packages and easy install, you can't go wrong with Ubuntu.
Most people just criticise the color of the default theme, or Debian ABI compatibilty or the stupid controversy regarding the codenames. These are all ignorant arguments IMHO. No one rants this much about Linspire, or Xandros..
Re:If only I didn't have to install stuff AFTER (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What a nice guy (Score:3, Informative)
Or... instead of using $20 million on an 8 day trip to space?
That said, I am very gratefull for his sponsorship of Ubuntu
Re:Insightful indeed... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Insightful indeed... (Score:2, Informative)
Ubuntu as distros go... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Maybe now (Score:3, Informative)
http://dccalliance.org/ [dccalliance.org]
I think it's an organization trying to promote cooperation amoungst the debian based distro's. Cooperation towards better coordination (eg. bug fixing) and some standardizaton to make things easier for the end-user. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
All the major debian derived distro's belong to it other than Ubuntu. Obviously this is a major ommision which, on it's own, is enough to kill it.
Re:Jambo Ubuntu (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Jambo Ubuntu (Score:3, Informative)
They state quite rigiorusly that the development branch/unstable is just that. however, you may have luck with changing the release and upgrading packages with "not so system core" dependecies. I think that this would be madness under the recent hoary to breezy development since a lot of core packages has seen a major revision jump.