Windows Interoperability in A Linux Distro 355
Magenta writes "There is a review of the Desktop OS Version 3 Business Edition from Xandros. This operating system is meant to allow users to easily move from Windows XP to Linux without the problems that can arise. Xandros not only can use Window's file system but it is able to run a great number of Windows programs using its CrossOver Office tool from CodeWeavers. This is one of the most accessible distros to come along in awhile and it marks a big step forward in the progress on Linux on the desktop."
Re:/shrug (Score:3, Informative)
Just for fun... (Score:2, Informative)
BTW, Xandros isn't a pretty looking dektop. And, it is not FREE as in FREE BEER
Talk about advertising (Score:5, Informative)
Crossover office is a product you can buy and install on most Linux distros. It's a nicely patched up and packaged version of Wine.
As for being able to access Windows filesystems, the Linux kernel contains drivers for FAT, FAT32 and NTFS. I would be very suprised if this distro can write to NTFS safely as this is something that is still being worked on.
Re:30 Great Number (Score:5, Informative)
Re:/shrug (Score:5, Informative)
Credit where credit is due (Score:4, Informative)
But credit where credit is due , the article summary makes it seem like Xandros was responsible for these things.http://www.codeweavers.com/ [codeweavers.com] code weaver site , responsible of Crossover office and naturally a link to wine on which Cross over office is based http://www.winehq.com/ [winehq.com].
A link to the linux NTFS project http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net] (I assume this is the driver they are using , correct me if I'm wrong)
(Cross over office is a great product , It also has a rather pleasant installer in my experience.So you don't need to switch distros
Free version (Score:5, Informative)
Re:No wayyy. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:/shrug (Score:3, Informative)
World of Warcraft is apparently considered extremely playable. Unfortunately as is common with the Transgaming stuff that still means that the installer crashes (but has finished when it does), the graphic glitches in places and performance is lousy in some situations without a special hack. Overall it is a way to get to play games, but it is hardly the most user-friendly solution there is.
Re:Windows compatibility (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Talk about advertising (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Jesus... (Score:3, Informative)
dpkg - i package.deb
or apt-get install package (if its on a repository
Don't like the command line , then you have the choice of a GUI front end such as Synaptics for Apt-get , Im fairly sure there are also dpkg front ends , i have never looked though as I'm comfortable on the command line .
there you have a zero mouse click install
Effortless painless installations all most all of the time , occasionally we get the odd dependancy screw up , But I'm fairly sure this would not happen with commercial games.
have you tried installing UT 2004 on linux , Its very easy . A nice front end installer similar in style to the windows one
These things are really easy to make with a little knowledge of scripting , and if you want a GUI you can easily make one, as QT and gtk i believe can both be used with scripting languages such as ruby or python
Re:/shrug (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Free version (Score:3, Informative)
There's no shortage of other crippled features in the free version either, such as a maximum of 4x for burning CDs.
What's the point? (Score:3, Informative)
Xandros Vs. Kubuntu (Score:2, Informative)
Ease of installation? Gimmie a break Kubuntu is quite easy to install if you know:
That is LESS than I needed to know when I installed Windows 3.1, 95, 98, 2000, XP, and MUCH less than I needed to install NT4 (concession: or Debian Sarge)
Since I'm a little more technical than a lot of people, I'm even trying Kubuntu with Wine and the Sidenet Wine Installation Utility to see if I can run the applications I need without buying Crossover.
Why am I saying this? Because I refuse to ever upgrade to Windows Vista. I don't need to buy software from a company that will treat me like a criminal every time I need a patch for their shitty software.
Imagine getting frisked (and not by your dream girl/guy either) every time you went to draw money from your bank account... would you be a member at that bank very long? I think not!
Imagine having to pay fees to run YOUR car (gas doesn't count, cause you pay for similar resources to run a computer...like electricity) and not even be allowed to fix it if something goes wrong.
It's riduculous, degrading, annoying, and just a plain shitty thing to do. I think Ubuntu and Kubuntu finally got it right, and I have tried Lindows, Xandros, Lycoris, Mandrake, and all the other "easy" distros. Someone finally got it right, make it work out of the box!
Bye everyone...lunch is over.
Re:Talk about advertising (Score:1, Informative)
Captive-NTFS does not emulate NTFS.DLL -- it uses a "captive" copy of the actual Windows code and emulates the rest of the Windows environment the DLL expects.
NTFS may possibly be well documented somewhere but you'd have to be at Microsoft or under NDA to tell. Microsoft has released no such information publicly. Outsiders have decoded parts of how NTFS works by reverse engineering or examining changes made in on disk file systems but still have trouble completely decoding the NFS log and figuring out how to safely do things like allocate new files on disk.
And then Microsoft extends NTFS in every new version of Windows..