How helpful will a voice over be when Linux doesn't install your soundcard drivers properly?

I started reading the review, but I was shaken free when I read this, on page 2:

"The company, which was formerly known as Lindows, has gotted a lot of press for including their OS with pre-bundled computers."

After "gotted", I think that as I continue to read the review, I'm going to be looking for these little goodies more than actually taking in the content.

... must ... resist ... powers ... of ... critique ...

When will people understand that Linux is for real men who honed their skillz by walking uphill both ways to the mainframe building in order to run their punch card programs? ::sigh::

Though I doubt that that a review of Linspire is going to get slashdotted late on a Friday afternoon.

The number of geeks who do not have a life...

Though I doubt that that a review of Linspire is going to get slashdotted late on a Friday afternoon.

Because we geeks are busy getting ready for one of those zillion parties we alway get invited to?

Copyright infringement?

Book him, Dano.

The failings of Linspire should only be recognized by power users who will want things like WINE and GNOME desktop.

I didn't know my desktop preference made me a power user. Kick ass, I just thought GNOME looked better! I'm sending a resume to Microsoft.

I hate you.
No wait, parties are boring, so whatever, go ahead and waste your time.

"Awful review" was a great review of the Linspire review. The author plainly stated his opinion and then backed it up with a tightly prepared bullet-point synopsis of serveral points. I especially enjoyed the comments regarding the length of the article and the photographed screenshots. I couldn't agree more.

The only bad thing I could say about this review (of the review) was that it was anti-climatic. After an intense, bullet-driven analysis, the author leaves us with no conclusion, instead leaving us to ponder over the difficulty of disk partitioning rather than tying together the point he was trying to make.

4(/5)

No problem, just download the source and compile it. ;-)

Sick bastard. Is this the answer to "How do you keep a Lindows user busy?"

Hi

I'm writing to ask for your advice since you seem to know about Linux. I was recently at a friends house, and he showed me his new Linux. It had a lot of interesting "features" like windows and firefox and tcpip. He even showed me dirty pictures with it.

My friend told me that he downloaded his Linux for free! He even showed me the web site. I think it was linuxtorrent.com. I freaked out! He's stealing form Linux! He told me that it was OK and that Linux is free, but I didn't believe him.

What should I do? My friend is stealing from Linux. A lot of people worked very hard to make Linux, and he's taking it without even saying thanks. I want him to stop, but I don't want him to go to jail! Please, help me, I don't know what to do?

Well, one could argue that Slashdot is a blog masquerading as a serious news site.

"As it turns out Marble Blast Gold is an insanely boring freeware game"

I stopped reading at this point as it was an insanely boring review.

I'm sorry, you said "skillz". Clearly, a violation of section 4.

You can turn in your punchcards on the way out.

"Review of the review review" was a reasonable review of the Linspire review review. However, the reviewer of the review's review was more then a little brief, and skimmed right over a few of his most important points. He claims to have "especially enjoyed the comments" about length and screenshots, however he neglected to back them up with any quotes or specific points from the original review of the review; leaving the audience to wonder exactly what it was he was agreeing with (many of us prefer to read the review's review before reading the review of the review).

However, the author, jlapier [slashdot.org], did raise some interesting points about the conclusion of the initial review's review. He claimed that it was "anti-climatic", and backed up his claims with a witty reference to the review's review's final point.

A well written, snappy review. Even though it suffered a little without reference to his primary material.

3.5 / 5