Fedora Core 4 Reviewer Finds It Bloated 110
Provataki writes "TuxTops reviews Fedora Core 4 and finds a number of problems with the popular distribution: high memory usage, usability problems, bugs, bloat. They awarded FC4 with 6 out of 10 at the end as despite its quirks they also find it a 'powerful distro' and easy to use."
Re:FC4 still runs too many services... (Score:5, Informative)
More reviews (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.osjournal.com/content/85/Reviews/A_loo
http://star-techcentral.com/tech/story.asp?file=/
These reviews aren't quite so negative as the review posted on
FC4 is pretty good (Score:2, Informative)
Sure it has some kinks, but I accept that since Fedora tends to push the envelope. It's really not 'Linux for Mom' like Ubuntu. Fedora requires some heavy lifting and some RTFM-ism. I've always liked Gnome and 2.10 with Clearlooks is just gorgeous. FC4 boots faster and does a good job of detecting hardware. A week or two ago I swapped my motherboard and processor and it booted up with everything working -- despite my changing 90% of the chipset including sound and networking.
Can you imagine doing that on a Windows box?
Yes, multimedia is emasculated thanks to software patent boogeymen in the US. I do all my ripping to OGG Vorbis anyway which is supported out of the box. I've yet to find any use for the Helix movie player though.
I got caught up in the flaming when Redhat "abandoned" the free desktop but that turned out to be a lot of hype. I even went looking for a replacement after Redhat 9 but kept coming back to Fedora. I really like their "workstation" install.
For me, Fedora occupies a comfortable zone between "I can install it it in 30 mins" and "I can use it for just about any need."