Beginner's Guide to Linux Distros 409
Martin writes "TipMonkies has a nice overview of various Linux distros for those of you with little time to research each distro yourself. The article also discusses some of the advantages/disadvantages of each distro." From the article: "SUSE- The 'U' is hard and the 'E' is soft. Almost like the word sue with an S on the end. SUSE is the other big commercial distro. It was when it was still it's own company in Germany, and now even bigger since being purchased by Novell."
SuSE Pronunciation (Score:2, Informative)
Summary (Score:2, Informative)
Currently, the biggest distros not derived from RedHat or Debian are Slackware and Gentoo which also have their own package management systems with various advantages/disadvantages
[2]
Now with Lycoris (just purchased by Mandriva), Xandros, Linspire, and a number of others, Mandriva no longer is known as the most dumbed down distro, but still is very good for people new to GNU/Linux
[3]
There are plenty of ground up distros, but most are derived either from RedHat using RPMs (RPM stands for RedHat Package Manager) or Debian using dpkg files
SuSE != 'sue with an S on the end' (Score:1, Informative)
Distrowatch (Score:5, Informative)
For a less biased review site, check out Distrowatch [distrowatch.com]. They also link to independent reviews.
Re:eh... (Score:1, Informative)
my linux experience... (Score:1, Informative)
Went through Debian, Mandriva, Suse, but settled when I got to Fedora. Of them all, it was an easy install and surprisingly easy to configure the Samba server. I'm CLI-defficient, so its GUI tools to configure/manage were what I couldn't find in any of those other distros (or if they are there then they're too hard to find!)
I definitely agree that most savvy Windows users will find Fedora's setup more intuitive than the other distros!
Got the debian releases wrong (Score:5, Informative)
Re:SuSE Pronunciation (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Slackware (Score:5, Informative)
--
Evan
Re:eh... (Score:4, Informative)
It was poor wording, but what he said makes sense if you think of it that way.
Slack-current (Score:5, Informative)
There's some assumption that you know what you're doing, and Slack doesn't set X as the default runlevel, but there's also a really helpful book available for free at Slack's website. About the only thing you really need to know is that RL4 is X, not RL5. That, and that it uses BSD init placement (/etc/rc.d/) instead of SysV (/etc/rc.d/rc.X/). Other than that, it's Linux. What works for one distro will work for Slack. Only there's probably already a package so you don't have to compile from source, just check linuxpackages.net first.
Also, Gnome has been moved to
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
He got the order wrong (Score:2, Informative)
Slackware
Debian
Gentoo
Redhat
Suse
Man
etc.
Slackware is the oldest existing distro. It is also my second favorite.
Debian is... Debian is just incredible. It should be covered early on because it defines a linux based distro for anyone who has been around for a while. I do not particularly care for debian though.
Gentoo needs to be covered early because it can give you the most features with the least amount of hassle. Personally, this is my favorite distro.
Redhat, and therefore Fedora, should be covered... if only because they got their act together after 7 years of improper security practices and poorly thought out packaging. I really do not like this distro, but I suppose I should thank them for pushing me to slackware pre 3.2.
Suse and Mandrake have enough history to be considered important. I have no personal opinions on either one though.
strike
Re:Slackware (Score:2, Informative)
The same is true of most Start Button based things. If I want to install a new program, I just type 'emerge package'. Want to start an app? Just type the name. Check for wireless? 'iwlist scanning'. Obviously you have to have gotten used to the CLI and memorized the commands, but it's much easier for many things once you do.
There are some things that a GUI is better suited for (browsing, word processing, etc), but the CLI is just the easiest way to do a huge number of things.
Suse Manuals (Score:5, Informative)
The Manuals that come with Suse are some of the best I've ever seen. Granted by the time I switched to Suse I'd been using Linux for several years and didn't find the user manual all that useful, but the administration manual is still a great reference. In fact I probably refer to it more than my Linux: Complete Reference book.
The author makes quite a point of mentioning that Suse Professional runs about $100, but fails to mention the quality of the manuals you get with it, or that you can buy an "upgrade" version, which is the full version without the printed manuals, for around $40 from Suse's website.
Re:Laptops... (Score:2, Informative)
YMMV I mostly use Ubuntu now and just keep PCLOS around for a rescue CD.
Re:Hard U? Soft E? (Score:4, Informative)
Which is interesting, given that the SuSE FAQ [sourceforge.net] says otherwise:
Which makes more sense to me given my (limited) knowledge of how to pronounce German words....
from teh author (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Laptops... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Slackware (Score:3, Informative)
Some things are hard to learn unless I force myself, but afterwards I'm usually glad I did. It's not enough that something like a command line is available. It has to be all I have before I'll really learn it. Anything with a steep learning curve can't be learned a bit at a time as you need it.
I use Ubuntu now, but despite its aim for user friendliness I still need to use bash from time to time, or log in as root without starting X. Server administration would also be hard without command line experience.
Re:SuSE Pronunciation (Score:3, Informative)
Ubuntu and Slackware (Score:4, Informative)
Re:finally... (Score:2, Informative)
I hope the previous code shows up the right way.
Anyways, the author could have used the acronym tag and showed a little something more informative to avoid going off his structure while still giving enough info to the visitors.
Your stupidity are belong to... mm... you!... get it?
Have a good one.
Re:Laptops... (Score:4, Informative)
That, and I like the GUI stuff. You can be a power user on SuSE without having to remember arcane CLI commands. Of course, if you want to, you can.
I tried Debian on my laptop and gave up after struggling with the devices for 20 hours or so. With SuSE it was all done for me.
Re:But people don't want to learn. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:SuSE Pronunciation (Score:3, Informative)
the problem with describing the "u" and "e" as "hard" and "soft" is that it's not only vernacular, but it's being misused. the words he's looking for, to imprecisely describe vowel pronunciation, are "long" for the u and and "short" for the e -- "hard" and "soft" are used to imprecisely describe consonants.
the four phonetic segments in "SuSE" are:
Distrowatch (Score:5, Informative)
My personal suggestion for newbies to get a LiveCD like Knoppix or UbuntuLive. Then move on to an friendly system like Mandriva/Fedora/UbuntuInstall/Mepis, etcetera depending on their specific needs and research (distrowatch again).
If they want to get even more into it, try something like Slackware or Gentoo. Maybe as a final stage of total mastery Linux From Scratch:D
OTOH, if they really have spefic needs, there's no end to distros out there addressing a niche market and not just the desktop.
Oh, and avoid those people who make "their" distro a religious choice and all other nonbelievers infidels.
Re:Ubuntu and Slackware (Score:3, Informative)
The First Live CD? (Score:5, Informative)
The first Live CD was Yggdrasil. You young whippresnappers would do well to learn how to say that word, yo!
Re:The First Live CD? (Score:2, Informative)
I still rue the day I chucked my small bundle of Plug N' Play Yggdrasil releases in the dustbin.. those were some classic CD's.
Gentoo (Score:2, Informative)
Rehashing tired "ricer" jokes is fine by me, but it would sadden me if prejudice stopped anyone from trying it out. For me, it completely broke the impression that Linux is difficult.
Re:Hardly (Score:3, Informative)