Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Debian GNU is Not Unix

Interview with Debian Project Leader 287

brunotorres writes "I've interviewed Martin Michlmayr, Debian project leader. In this interview we talked about the upcoming Debian release, Sarge. An excerpt: 'We heard for years that Debian is hard to install and the old installer wasn't very easy to maintain or advance, so we we decided to throw the installer away and start from scratch. The new installer is much more modular, which makes it easier to maintain and extend.'" Reader ron_ivi points out that new Debian/Hurd CDs are available. Newsforge and Slashdot are both part of OSTG.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Interview with Debian Project Leader

Comments Filter:
  • by Uptown Joe ( 819388 ) on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @06:41PM (#11258609)
    http://www.ubuntulinux.org/ They will mail (snail) you 10 copies for free... The installer is nice and the desktop looks pretty damn good... Uptown (not an Ubuntu salesman) Joe
  • by RealAlaskan ( 576404 ) on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @06:48PM (#11258666) Homepage Journal
    The quote, in context:
    NF: [interviewer] What are the most important features of the new installer?

    MM: [interviewee] We heard for years that Debian is hard to install and the old installer wasn't very easy to maintain or advance, so we we decided to throw the installer away and start from scratch. The new installer is much more modular, which makes it easier to maintain and extend. From the user's point of view, the new installer is much easier to use. It asks fewer questions than the old one, does automatic hardware detection, and has several other new features, such as automatic detection of other operating system on your machine. It also supports RAID and LVM.

  • by kneeless ( 837507 ) on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @06:54PM (#11258724)
    Unless you can do source on the fly
    apt-get source gnuchess --compile
  • by northcat ( 827059 ) on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @06:57PM (#11258761) Journal
    The current debian release (woody) works ABSOLUTELY finely for me. Its very stable. Of course, I can't boast to others about having the latest version of GEyeCandy but I really don't give a shit. If I want the latest version of a particular program I can upgrade it independently (and there are backports from sarge of several important programs available for woody. so you can't complain about X not working). No one is going to need the latest versions of EVERY fucking package in their distro. But in case you do, you can use testing. Its pretty stable. At least it's as stable as all those distros out there whose version numbers cannot be stored in a 32-bit ints.
  • by northcat ( 827059 ) on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @07:00PM (#11258778) Journal
    IIRC, ubuntu uses the new debian-installer.
  • by neiras ( 723124 ) on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @07:20PM (#11258973)
    Uh oh! Someone didn't do their homework!

    Gentoo has always allowed you to downgrade packages to any previous version. The revdep-rebuild script will even attempt to fix any broken dynamic linkage that might result.

    emerge =packagename-old.version && revdep-rebuild
    will do the trick, and then you'll need to edit
    /etc/portage/package.mask
    to mask versions newer than the old one you installed.

    I bet you're having fun with BSD if you missed such an obvious feature of Portage :D

  • by northcat ( 827059 ) on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @07:25PM (#11259017) Journal
    Taking what you are saying a step further, why can't we just have a single distro? No we can't. The different free distros cater for different needs. Gentoo is for putting together a distro from the source. Debian is a distro with virtually all the apps out there and with a lot of ways to install the packages and supports many architectures. Fedora is for new users and people who want the latest eye candy apps. The commercial distros like SuSE and Mandrake *can* be unified but they're just in it for the money and they wont do it. Try convincing them.

    Now, why can't we have a single package management system/installation system? Same reasoning - different distros do different things. You can't have a single package management system for both pre-compiled and source code distros without putting extra overhead on one of them. Same thing goes for installation system. And commercial distros just won't do it. Again, try convincing them.
  • by phorm ( 591458 ) on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @07:38PM (#11259154) Journal
    (after you've chosen a boot often such as "vanilla" or "bf24" and then selected a language)

    ALT+F2
    cat /proc/pci

    voila! Hardware devices (well, PCI/AGP anyhow).
  • by schnits0r ( 633893 ) <nathannd@@@sasktel...net> on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @08:25PM (#11259521) Homepage Journal
    Debian:

    "Stable". Apt-get is beautiful. jsut type in what you want ot get and you ahve it. Dependancies are always wonderful with this because it deals with it automaticly. The problem is if you use the stable package, be prepared to wait years for a new version of your software. I usually say testing for my install, so my things are relatively current, but not totally buggy. Not really for a total linux newbie, but if you are smart enough to understand basic computer things, you coudl get by.


    Mandrake:

    URMPI is like apt get, but from what I noticed, not with as many packages. Its my distro of choice at the moment. Things (NFS, SMB, SSH) just work, with minimal setup. If you are migrating, it's the best for that.


    Redhat:

    Good for enterprize. If you want basic office stuff, this is the distro for oyu. If yu want something any more then what is already on the disk, be prepared for dependancy issues (I knwo there is apt-get, but package selection is limited). Circular dependantcies are a pain in the ass (you want to install A, but can't because oyu need B, but you can't install B because oyu need C, and you can't install C, becasue you need A)


    Something else:

    Lycoris is another "mirgration" type of linux. The install even has a solitarie game for oyu to play while you wait. It's all dumbed down...I found that to be very limiting.

    Slackware was my "first" distro when I was a linux virgin..and I sure promise yo if oyu make that your first distro, you will feel like a virgin. Pain in the ass. I lost many harddrives due to it. Lucky for me, the drives were small 500MBish drives on a 486.

    KNoppix. TRy it first. If you can familiarize yourself with knoppix, it helps reduce the risk to your system from a bad install, and you can muck around with it without killing anything important.

    Gentoo. Ricer jokes aside, it's a good distro if oyu need a special custom configuration...say if oyu have a 64 bit processor or something, otherwise, be prepared to spend hours and hours compiling linux. (I haven't used Gentoo, but this is what I heard).

    There are other distros out there, you will probably install linux several times before oyu find the one that works for you.


    http://distrowatch.com/ [distrowatch.com] has a more complete list of distros.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @08:43PM (#11259655)
    You remember correctly.

    (installed it yesterday on my laptop, it included the new debian installer)
  • by Techiegeeks ( 643964 ) <geekboy@techiegeeks.com> on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @10:23PM (#11260367) Homepage Journal
    Just recommend Ubuntu for people that are new to Linux. It's an easy install, a blast to use and it's Debian based. Plus they have a Live CD. So that they could test it out before installing it.

    I like it because it doesn't overwhelm you with apps. And if you want to add something, just apt-get it (or better yet fire up Synaptic).

    http://www.ubuntulinux.org

  • by Techiegeeks ( 643964 ) <geekboy@techiegeeks.com> on Tuesday January 04, 2005 @10:29PM (#11260403) Homepage Journal
    Go with Ubuntu. It's Debian based. Very easy to install and use. Check it out at http://www.ubuntulinux.org.
  • by Dwonis ( 52652 ) * on Wednesday January 05, 2005 @02:05AM (#11261397)
    The quick way to install a particular version of a package is to run:
    apt-get install wmbiff=0.3.8-3

    Of course, the package will be upgraded next time you do an upgrade, so to stop that, you can "hold" the package:

    echo 'wmbiff hold' | dpkg --set-selections

    To undo that, you'd run:

    echo 'wmbiff install' | dpkg --set-selections

    Of course, fullscreen package management utilities like aptitude and Synaptic let you do the above with fewer keystrokes.

    Alternatively, you can put something like the following into /etc/apt/preferences (see man apt_preferences for more details):

    Package: wmbiff
    Pin: version 0.3.8
    Pin-Priority: 501

    Hope that helps.

  • by clacke ( 214199 ) on Wednesday January 05, 2005 @04:06AM (#11261831)
    You haven't been doing your homework. From http://www.ubuntulinux.org/ [ubuntulinux.org] (the front page, this text has been there for several weeks):
    UPDATE: The Ubuntu CD Distribution System will NOT close to new orders for Warty CDs as previously announced. Thanks to everyone who emailed to ask us to keep the free CD shipments going for Warty. See the CD FAQ for more info.
    Haven't received mine yet, though.
  • by run2000 ( 35114 ) on Wednesday January 05, 2005 @07:27AM (#11262326)
    KDE 3.3.1 had just made the Sarge mirrors. I doubt they'd pull it out and go back to 3.2.3 for release.

FORTUNE'S FUN FACTS TO KNOW AND TELL: A giant panda bear is really a member of the racoon family.

Working...