Linux Kernel to Fork? 578
Ninjy writes "Techworld has a story up about the possibility of the 2.7 kernel forking to accomodate large patch sets. Will this actually happen, and will the community back such a decision? "
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion
Beginning of FreeLinux, OpenLinux and NetLinux? (Score:2, Funny)
Is this the beginning of FreeLinux, OpenLinux and NetLinux?
What about SCOLinux or MSLinux?
Run, Chicken Little, Run! (Score:5, Funny)
Then where would we be?
Re: Run Windows? -- Just No Time (Score:3, Funny)
I imagine a future where I can buy a copy of Windows and it would work just like Linux. If this could be a reality today, I would maybe consider Windows for some non-technical people.
Re:Letter to Editor... (Score:2, Funny)
And THAT ladies and gentlemen is what seperates Linux kernel docimentation from the standard IBM documentation.
My response: (Score:2, Funny)
Is Mr. Krill some sort of AI? (Score:5, Funny)
Fork?!?!? (Score:2, Funny)
Now I'm cornfused!
Kenny P.
Visualize Whirled P.'s
So Some Want a Spoon.... (Score:4, Funny)
Forking is a better evolution process as forking is only part the the process. The other part is re-integration of new and wonderful things resulting from forking..
In other news... (Score:1, Funny)
Kernel forking (Score:5, Funny)
But I can see things deteriorating rapidly: someone will want vfork for kernels, someone else will implement kernel-to-kernel pipes, someone else will make vfork obsolete, someone will complain about kernels not getting SIGCHLDs from their child kernels, etc.
What? No, of I course I didn't read the fsck'n article
Re:From the article... (Score:5, Funny)
ever used apt?
Re:From the article... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:About time.... (Score:3, Funny)
You must be new here.
Re:From the article... (Score:2, Funny)