Fedora Core Release 3 Released 502
anyweb writes "Fedora Core Release 3 is out now, Heidelberg, 2.6.9-1.667 kernel, Firefox included ! Gnome 2.8 and more.
Here are
some screenshots" New release includes Gnome 2.8, KDE 3.3, Kernel 2.6.9, Firefox PR1, Thunderbird 0.8, Ximian Evolution 2.0 and more. Here is a Mirror List and Bit Torrent
Heidelberg (Score:0, Informative)
Re:Time to Upgrade (Score:5, Informative)
The recommeneded way to upgrade is to use installer (annaconda), some people have reported problems using yum or apt.
Re:Time to Upgrade (Score:5, Informative)
2) Burn them to CDs
3) Put on the FC3 cd and click on upgrade
can't get any easier than that. I wouldnt want to use yum or apt because of the GCC upgrade.
DVD iso is a convenient size (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Heidelberg (Score:1, Informative)
No, FC1 was Cambridge and FC2 was Tettnang (also in Germany).
IIRC, it was a kernel+parted issue (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Fedora moves too fast (Score:5, Informative)
Six months. It's always six months. [redhat.com] You need to download them sooner, perhaps. ;)
Re:MOD Parent up, and answer (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Enterprise? (Score:5, Informative)
What do you mean "why do they keep releasing new versions"? They keep releasing new versions because that's the point of having a distribution. Fedora Core partly exists to support RHEL, but it has its own life as well -- think Mozilla and Netscape, OpenOffice.org and StarOffice.
And "when do they decide"? Well, market realities mean they need a new RHEL release every certain amount of time -- probably every year and a half or so. So when that "when" approaches, I imagine they look to see what the most solid current Fedora base, and develop along with this.
In fact, RHEL 4 is being developed in parallel with FC3. See this LWN.net article [lwn.net] for more details.
Re:Heidelberg? (Score:4, Informative)
Mirror in Europe (Score:5, Informative)
If you are in Europe and looking for a fast mirror, try this one [linux.cz] (i386; x86_64 is here [linux.cz]).
80 minutes after the release and my bandwidth and HDD speed is still not maxed out
(IAAAOTS - I am an administrator of this server).
Re:Question: (Score:4, Informative)
Re:That's the point (Score:5, Informative)
Regards,
Steve
Not specific to FC2 (Score:1, Informative)
Not true. Mandrake 10 and Suse 9.1 also had this problem.
As one of the parents points out, it was an error with the parted application used by all three distros listed above.
kernel.org stats (Score:5, Informative)
570 Mbit/s (about 540 Mbit/s of which are mirrors.kernel.org, i.e. mostly Fedora); load average 232.44.
Re:fiiiinally (Score:3, Informative)
Re:firefox pr1 (Score:2, Informative)
Regards,
Steve
Re:fiiiinally (Score:1, Informative)
Re:How it compares to Ubuntu? (Score:2, Informative)
Regards,
Steve
Mu. (Score:3, Informative)
Updates available (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Fedora moves too fast (Score:3, Informative)
Although all Fedora releases are given whole numbers, they're clearly not all going to be huge changes. I think of them like this (and I don't work at Red Hat, so I can, without getting in trouble): Really, the changes don't look all that dramatic this time around.
Remmber, Red Hat has always [rospot.com] put out new releases about every six months. You probably shouldn't set your watch by it exactly, but you might be able to by the averages. The new "Fedora" scheme lets them be more loose with making radical changes without waiting a year and a half (.0,
Re:2.3GB? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Time to Upgrade (Score:5, Informative)
It works very well. To upgrade from FC2 to FC3 using yum do:
Then watch it churn. Of course, if you have third-party software installed, you may want to wait till your vendors catch up with FC3.
Re:Question: (Score:1, Informative)
"Just boot the installer (first CD of the Fedora distro or a special boot disk) and at the prompt type "linux askmethod". From there just follow the NFS boot option. If you put the boot disk on a CDRW then you don't even need to waste a CD every time you try a new Fedora version.
I did this with FC2 and had Everything installed and booted in about 15 minutes.
Re:DVD iso is a convenient size (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Fedora (Score:4, Informative)
Uh, no .... Have a look here [redhat.com] and tell me where it mentions stable/testing/unstable. The official Fedora package set contains exactly one version of each application. Third party packagers like Fedora.us and Livna.org have adopted the stable/testing/unstable split, but they are separate entities from Red Hat, and are not official Fedora packages.
I'll readily admit that I won't use Fedora without adding Fedora.us and Livna.org to my yum/apt sources, but you're either mistaken in your understanding of the Fedora community or spreading FUD.
Re:Time for standard kernels in these releases (Score:5, Informative)
2.6 is now both the stable and development branch for the foreseeable future. New features are rapidly integrated and 2.6.x.y versions are optionally released for stability, but a lot of the testing and QA is being offloaded to the distributions.
I personally want Red Hat to tweak their kernels. That's what a distributors job is in my opinion, pulling software from all sort of sources and integrating them into a coherent product. I want Red Hat to include fixes for ACPI, CD recording, and basically do everything to assure that I don't have to compile my own kernel. Red Hat employs some of the best core kernel developers, over the years they've earned my trust and that of my company's. So in a sense, yes, they can do better, and we expect it of them. Perhaps that's not the kind of vendor you're looking for, in which case just stick to Slackware.
Re:Firewire Support? (Score:3, Informative)
Release notes (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I was just asking on the Firefox forums... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Heidelberg (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Two things, please answer. (Score:5, Informative)
NFS (Score:5, Informative)
2) Burn only the first ISO to CD-R. Upon boot (from CD-ROM), when the "Linux:" prompt appears, enter the following:
linux askmethod
3) Profit! Uh... No. Actually, after a: selecting NFS from the list and b: requesting (DHCP-enabled networks) or specifying an IP address, c: enter the NFS server's IP address and the NFS path where the ISO images are located (not the mount point, the actual path from the root -- e.g.
And that's it! If you're connecting over Fast Ethernet, your installation will be unbelievably fast -- and you can avoid having to swap CD-ROMs as you go.
Re:Two things, please answer. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Time to Upgrade (Score:2, Informative)
>pwd
Ergo, replace
$releasever --> 2
$basearch --> i386
I used such a hardwiring to update RH7.2 to 7.3 ever since the former was dropped by Fedora Legacy.
MD5SUM (Score:2, Informative)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
ca49964739f84848ca78fc03662272fb FC3-i386-DVD.iso
e5e0328370d899bd77c8d5c7f1bd3ea
5cf3f9ae84d8d0ec4967961
ee5f134b6880145e576c97c
7c57d517a6b0bb98b586003
db8c7254beeb4f6b891d1ed
2c11674cf429fe570445afd9d5ff5
f88f6ab5947ca41f3cf31db044872
6331c00aa3e8c088cc365eeb7ef23
07bb34ce97b62b99f84d32812a2ee
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBiWL+tEJp0E8qb9IRAtvbAJ9ogGEnoKYeT9exJ/B
iYqa2g5AiQK3PldULLM0Zhw=
=gMjQ
heidelberg-binary-x86_64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
2786a751df919f340d967a4833b63b16 FC3-x86_64-DVD.iso
0b9f23eff713db3a0d5a778e38d70
bd15bac386cdc30b6fcdf
d89ea5afcb3b94cbfaa3c
d177e8134ffff13e0029f
b61b0eb7e0171837aeeff
99dc12c7e8a93844a48a5675a9c
399b7ffd721ebb4244a02c34cdb
f58b1de3b880df55dbbd37d1434
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBiWW9tEJp0E8qb9IRAiL2AJ9WPp23dJDCI4KUBtO
tEhZiwbsnkhseHhKIqUGfDo=
=CjaW
Re:Does FC do net installs? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Fedora Core 3 Thoughts (Score:3, Informative)
Actually it was written by Yellow Dog [yellowdoglinux.com]. Thus the name "Yellowdog Updater, Modified".
Yum was nowhere near apt in functionality but it is getting there.
I disagree. With this release, Yum has surpassed Apt in functionality (mirror lists for example).
My linux upgrades keep chugging... (Score:2, Informative)
Yes I keep a windows box around for those odd things that just wont run correctly under wine. And yes I am ashamed that I actually PAYED the Borg for the copy of Windows 2k.
But its stuck at SP2 and I can say that that is the end for software from the Borg for me.
On the other hand my linux box just keeps up updating and updating and updating as fast as I can grab the ISOs ;P
Try again (Score:4, Informative)
There were kernel issues initially that were fixed a while later.
I installed FC2 from
New in Gnome 2.8 (Score:3, Informative)
Screenshots included.
Rather than screenshots, how about a faq? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Time to Upgrade (Score:2, Informative)
To upgrade via yum the short version goes like this:
1. backup all your data
2. upgrade yum to yum from fc3
3. upgrade fedora-release to fedora-release from fc3
4. make sure all your repositories point where you think they should
point.
5. run yum list updates - just to make sure things seem sane and working
6. make sure you are NOT in X and X is not loaded
6. from a terminal prompt run: yum upgrade
7. wait wait wait
8. you must reboot before using your system again
9. reboot the system and make sure you select the new kernel, not the
old one(s)
10. once your system is fully booted you may want to install some
additional items. Recommended:
yum groupupdate "GNOME Desktop Environment"
(thx to seth vidal)
Re:Fedora Core 3 Thoughts (Score:3, Informative)
Well, except apt doesn't support multiarch. This makes x86_64 a pain (if you want the ability to run any 32-bit code at all). That's the main hangup, and it doesn't look like it's going to be fixed any time soon.
Re:Fedora Core 3 Thoughts (Score:1, Informative)
when you need to run 32bit packages side by side with 64bit packages on 64bit cpus that understand how to run 32bit.. like the amd64 stuff. This ability is going to become increasingly important as more and more amd64 bit hardware gets purchased. Not all open source software compiles cleanly on 64bit yet, and there will always be a need to run proprietary 32bit software on 64bit systems.
my understanding is apt still doesn't have a way to expose rpm's native way of installing 32bit and 64bit packages in parallel, and the upstream apt developers are very keen on getting apt to support this sort of thing, but the ability but it just isn't there yet. Yum does have support for this, so does anaconda, so does up2date. For people using 64bit fedora core, the will be using this feature more than they are aware, as they install software that is 32bit compiled and need to install 32bit libraries in parrallel with the 64bit libraries already on the system.
-jef
WARNING ALL DOWNLOADING FROM SUPRNOVA (Score:3, Informative)
Original md5sum
db8c7254beeb4f6b891d1ed3f689b412 FC3-i386-disc1.iso
2c11674cf429fe570445afd9d5ff5
f88f6ab5947ca41f3cf31db044872
6331c00aa3e8c088cc365eeb7ef23
Suprnova md5sum
5f99bc2fb3685cb52ef1ea6a2a8b27ce FC3-i386-disc1.iso
eda0debffcb97f63162782818727c
f6da03ef5d78ed1fef464970c82fa
b6e2e7c9b86b49d9cab1557be0043