Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Novell GUI Software Linux

Novell Linux Desktop Released 183

KingDaveRa writes "Novell have just released Novell Linux Desktop. Its based on SuSE Linux, but is cut down quite a bit to just include essential apps - perfect for a corporate environment. Novell claim to not be going directly after Windows, but rather pushing this as legacy Unix users. The Register has a take on this too."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Novell Linux Desktop Released

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Hmm..Novell (Score:2, Insightful)

    by brianlawson ( 675334 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @10:00AM (#10753817) Journal
    I think this is a much bigger step than what it is being given credit for at first glance. It looks like the default desktop environment is Gnome instead of KDE. I, for one, am extremely happy to see that.
  • Age Old (Score:5, Insightful)

    by z0ink ( 572154 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @10:08AM (#10753876)
    Perhaps Novell can help in providing more legitimacy toward linux desktops to the Corporate World. It's not that linux desktops geared toward corporations haven't been around, but more the lack of a Name Brand company to trust purchasing it from. I'm being hopeful, but any amount this release can cut into Microsoft's market share is good for us all.
  • Re:SuSE personal? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by julesh ( 229690 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @10:08AM (#10753879)
    Figures. I knew they'd killed SuSE personal for a reason: they wanted to make money off it and knew they couldn't with the old model.
  • don't bother (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ylikone ( 589264 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @10:10AM (#10753894) Homepage
    If Mandrake is working for you, why switch?
  • Mirror? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Snuden ( 252397 ) <morten@ l i ghtworkings.dk> on Monday November 08, 2004 @10:16AM (#10753934) Homepage
    Does anyone have a mirror or a bittorrent tracker? The site was sort of okay before 12:00 GMT+1 but now it's rather dead...
  • Re:Cut down (Score:2, Insightful)

    by pooh666 ( 624584 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @10:48AM (#10754188)
    Why don't you just crawl back into your weenie box. Yeah, that is what my boss asks for consistently in a desktop OS, more Kernels!
  • Re:So, it has KDE? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 08, 2004 @10:57AM (#10754276)
    I fail to see how Gnome is more "business-friendly" than KDE is.

    If you ever have to support a group of more than 50 users in a corporate environemnt, then you should be able to see how GNOME is more business-friendly than KDE. It is easier to set global policies in GNOME than in KDE, for example. Also, the fact that only the basic configuration options are available by default (the other ones requiring some knowledge of the configuration editor) means that most users stick to the basic options instead of changing many settings that quickly become a nightmare for the support guys.

    Both KDE and GNOME are highly configurable. But the fact that GNOME makes it easy to change some common settings but makes it a bit more difficult to change more exotic stuff is a valuable feature for business users (even if some power users tend to be a bit frustrated by that).

    I don't know if you ever had to support a large group of users and do that under strict constraints (time and budget) but from that point of view I think that GNOME is more business-friendly than KDE.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 08, 2004 @11:14AM (#10754446)
    uhhh

    wtf makes this FUD post anything more then a troll attempt to bash MS??

    "Novell has had to remake every Windows version "

    since when did Novell make Windows at all??

    "Windows is so not network enabled it isnt well suited to be in a network period"

    guess you never RTFM...it is very network enabled...

    lets see, Linux is ready... "its lacking is zenworks like features with centrally managed menus and common login scripts" Zen has been linux for some time now, but it is a sepperate tool. "The profiles bit is really easy on linux and just needs some simple glue to work seamless" ya, profiles in Novell and Windows are sooooooo hard to do, but Linux is ready as soon as they fix it...

    Windows has these abilities, has had them for some time (linux has them too, but some zealots are not as knowledgable as they think)

    Stop the bashing, try being constructive.

    Stop spouting FUD, try the truth or be silent.

    Stop jumping on a hate-wagon, since you have no clue why you are on it other then to "belong" to something (like the majority of hate groups, KKK, White Supremist, etc, etc...).

    Slashdot mods and editors should strive to discourge this behaviour, instead of encouraging it. It can only serve to alienate others, and discredit the site as "extremely biased".

  • Yep, using pam_auth_ncpfs to get a Windows desktop to login to a Novell server would be crazy amounts of work. Fortunatly, they have this thing called the "Novell Client" which is for windows. It takes all of about 5 minutes to install. Windows 3.11, Windows 95, and all later versions, are specificlly built to accept network client drivers, like say, those from Novell.

    Or do you mean it is crazy amounts of work for Novell to write a widows client? I doubt it. For Windows, Novell currently has two clients, one for 95/98 and one for NT/2000/XP. The "log into the server" part is a minor component, trivial in comparision to every thing else it does, ZENWorks integration for one.

    And this is not Windows NT or Netware 3.12 days. You login to the network not into a server.

  • by idesofmarch ( 730937 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @11:19AM (#10754507)
    Windows is so not network enabled it isn't well suited to be in a network? Are you stark raving looney? While you may have many legitimate criticisms of Windows, this surely is not one of them.

    While not preinstalled, Windows has come with a Client for Netware Networks for as long as I can remember. I know that Novell recommends its client, but I have not had any issues with the MS client whenever I have used it.

    Anyway, Novell was king of the network hill for a good while. It should have leveraged this position while it had it to put out its own desktop back then. It will be an uphill battle now.

  • by Jason Earl ( 1894 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @12:18PM (#10755193) Homepage Journal

    Novell is going after the "low hanging fruit" in much the same way that Red Hat's biggest efforts to date have been in convincing Solaris customers to switch to Linux. What's the sense in attacking Microsoft outright when you can make more money somewhere else.

    The folks at Novell know that over the long haul an inexpensive, secure, and stable no-frills desktop is going to make a market for itself just about everywhere. However, Novell is absolutely right in pointing out that for right now the obvious application is in locations where a minimal set of applications is needed.

    To give you an example, I used to work in a french fry factory. The factory had about 90 PCs, but less than 20 of these PCs were used by office workers. The rest of the PCs were out in the plant and were used mostly to let people out on the floor view data. The machines out on the plant floor could easily have been running Linux, and it would have saved the company a substantial sum of money.

    Novell knows that there are lots of businesses like that french fry plant, and they also know that in the long run once these locations get a little bit of experience with Linux clients that essentially run themselves that the IT folks are going to start looking at ways to migrate the remaining office workers to Linux. More importantly, when they buy or build new applications they will be far more likely to create the applications in a way that is portable to Linux.

    Which brings us to the second part of Novell's master plan. Novell plans to use Mono to entice existing .NET developers into creating cross-platform applications.

  • Re:SuSE personal? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by eviltypeguy ( 521224 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @12:35PM (#10755397)
    And it's good for Students who run their own servers too, since you can get one of the various RHEL editions for $25 or $50 a year. Pretty good for an ultra stable codebase with prompt security updates and backports of necessary features for most hardware, etc.
  • Re:SuSE personal? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by julesh ( 229690 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @01:37PM (#10756136)
    Next time you're quoting me, don't cut out context just because it doesn't support your point. The "more than enough money" section you quote was about what they see from me. I don't see why _I_ need to support them any more than I already do.

    And putting up with me downloading free copies of their distribution is one of the payments they make for the fact that THEY DISTRIBUTE CODE I WROTE.

    In addition to this, SuSE had somewhere in the region of $500 directly because of me making recommendations to my clients over the last 2 years.

    And, despite all of this, you're calling ME a freeloader? Go and get a life.
  • Re:Cut down (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Glamdrlng ( 654792 ) on Monday November 08, 2004 @03:34PM (#10757507)
    "It nuked my win2000 install on one and refuses to see any partitions on the other and will only accept the whole device."

    That is un-fucking-believably lame.
    How exactly is that lame? In a corporate environment that has a heavy windows install base, dual-booting is a reality. Between web apps that only run on IE and home-grown apps that only run on windows, I'll never be able to do my job on a linux only machine. For someone like me my choices are pretty much limited to dual boot and VM.

    I'm not averse to tinkering with VMWare, I just haven 't gotten around to it. But I don't think I should have to just because for some reason the newest releases of every other Linux distro bork up your windows install. Think for a moment of the amount of flack that would dished out if the next Microsoft OS couldn't be run in a dual boot environment, then hold your favorite distro to the same standard.

Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.

Working...