Gartner Says Linux PCs Just Used To Pirate Windows 815
LostCluster writes "CNET is reporting results from a Gartner Group report that claims 40% of desktop machines sold with Linux on them are being used to run pirate copies of Windows! The report goes on to say that this stat reaches as high in 80% in 'emerging markets', the same places that the stripped down lite version of Windows is being aimed at. Gartner's making a bold prediction that the number of machines sold as Linux desktops may eclipse the number of machines actually running Linux."
Shhhh! (Score:5, Funny)
Nah! (Score:4, Funny)
WTF? (Score:2, Funny)
Obligitory Windows Putdown. (Score:5, Funny)
Linux desktops may eclipse the number of machines actually running Linux."
Funny that. Its a bit like Windows if you take into account crashes - The
number of machines sold as Windows desktops is far greater than the number
of machines actually RUNNING Windows.
In other news (Score:5, Funny)
In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Linux is also subverting good, honest children to criminal behaviour, communism and encouraging them to move to harder drugs such as Heavy Metal music. Not to mention occultism and role playing games.
Linux on an IBM mainframe is also less cost effective than Windows on a dual Xeon! Quick, in the Holy name of Redmond, call a priest and bring out the holy water!
Re:Not enough statistics to go on (Score:1, Funny)
Sorry, but sitting around and guessing this crap is bullcrap, and they know it. I want to see the hard data, the full poll data and other data they used to write the report.
I am betting that either they bought 10 linux pc's and themselves installed windows on 4 of them to make up that tidbit (and when does 40% mean a majority?)
Gartner = a complete joke in the corperate world anyways, the director of Sales here points that out on a weekly basis to everyone.
Dodgy figures (Score:3, Funny)
Slashdotters working for Gartner? (Score:3, Funny)
Making wild accusations without backing it up with a solid proof because of remote possibilities... When did slashdotters start working for Gartner?
Re:Wow (Score:3, Funny)
When was this?
Re:Yeah, but... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:That's preposterous! (Score:5, Funny)
We complain about it more. Next question.
Yeah, I admit it (Score:4, Funny)
Re:And vice versa (Score:2, Funny)
I just bought a new laptop from dell. Don't have the option to escape the MS tax on those, but I wiped that thing clean and threw linux on it.
Thanks to Redmond we have a culture that accepts spyware, pop-ups, and crashes as standard operating procedure.
Re:wow! (Score:5, Funny)
That's odd, my laptop [apple.com] didn't even have the option of coming with Windows.
Banned from buying PC components! (Score:2, Funny)
Well, what if somebody puts them all together and makes a PC? Then it wouldn't have an operating system, and you'd be a pirate.
I wonder what the other software companies will do to ensure that their software isn't pirated? Maybe you'll soon only be allowed to buy a PC if you buy a copy of Photo Shop (incase you pirate that).
Actually, when you buy a house, you may soon find that you are forced to pay for cable, incase you start using a descrambler illegally.
Man, things could really get expensive here!
Re:Wow (Score:3, Funny)
piracy was bound to happen (Score:3, Funny)
burnin
Re:+1 Insightful (Score:5, Funny)
Re:wow! (Score:5, Funny)
If I could short every moronic "market X will expand by {number over 300%} in the next 2 years!" prediction that Gartner produces, I'd be richer than Gates. Anyone who back-checks their predictions can't take these guys seriously. In this case, past performance is a predictor of future results.
Re:+1 Insightful (Score:3, Funny)