HP Releases Linux-Based Notebook 392
SteamyMobile writes "As the article says, 'In a sign the Linux operating system may be gaining traction beyond server and other back-room systems, HP said Tuesday it will be the first major PC maker to ship a business notebook computer pre-installed' with Linux. This is great news because, as anyone who has ever tried to run Linux (or even Windows XP) on a laptop knows, laptops come with all kinds of funky hardware, and it's often a mess trying to find and configure the right kernel modules to make things like software suspend work correctly. Having it shipped pre-loaded, and with support, makes it easy for me to decide where I'm getting my next laptop. Linux has been ready for the desktop for a while now, but it is good to see companies like HP acknowledging that."
linux-laptop! (Score:5, Interesting)
Ahhhhh....One Second Please (Score:3, Interesting)
hp laptops (Score:3, Interesting)
Huh? (Score:4, Interesting)
Fink said the launch is a test "so that we can see the take up we get for this particular product."
Soooo.... if the "take up" is insufficient, then the test failed? Where is the customer left in that case?
Re:Ahhhhh....One Second Please (Score:3, Interesting)
Worth the price for Wireless (Score:5, Interesting)
This does look really nice though, and I'm glad to see that they are using Suse, which seems to be the best "User Oriented" distrobution out there. I'm actually a little suprised that they can make a notebook no more expensive than it is with all supported hardware, as I've noticed Linux compatible hardware tends to be a wee bit more expensive than non-supported hardware.
I do have two concerns though, first off is the quality of the notebook. OS aside, if the hardware isn't robust enough to stand up to lots of abuse, then it won't sell well and someone will probably blame that on Linux. The second concern I have is that while Suse Professional is wonderful, the personal edition seems to really lack some important things (like a compiler. I don't care if your not a developer, if your using linux at some point you will want to install software that has to be compiled for your system).
Good. Linux laptop. I am SO there. (Score:0, Interesting)
I love this. I have a Gateway 400vtx. Works, the damn video card is irritating and Gateway sucks.
But for 1140?
I AM THEIR. It's mine. I want it. It's mine.
For a long time I thought, who needs a laptop? The desktop is faster and cheaper.
But now that I have one? I use it more then my desktop.
Why? Because it's convienient. I like to sit down in the middle of the room with the laptop in front of me. With the front propted up on my crossed legs It's confortable for my hands, and I am around other people instead of stuck in the "computer room". I take it outside, I take to work. Take it on trips.
Nice.
My desktop is for gaming (that runs linux, too).
It's nothing wonderfull, but it's nice. I have a couple tv capture cards, so I stream TV to my laptop and record shows to watch at work in the background.
It's nice. And one that is sold brand new with Linux installed? Everything works out of the box?
No kernel patching no experimental drivers? Great. Plug n run. Keep my big media stuff on my old Desktop, now gaming rig/file server/media server/mythtv backend. Work gets done the on laptop.
(oh and if you think that "hey windows you don't have to patch". I prefer to expend effort getting something to work, rather then continiously fixing broken crap. Windows is the death of a thousand cuts.)
$60 difference... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Ahhhhh....One Second Please (Score:5, Interesting)
You put in the 'rescue' disk and click on "Yes".
There, not so hard, is it?
Not that I've ever had to do a reinstall of Linux for maintenance purposes. It doesn't fragment, crud up or slow down and BonziBuddy doesn't run on it.
KFG
The acid test for linux on any laptop (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Not sure what the article author is talking abo (Score:2, Interesting)
Convenience (Score:3, Interesting)
(Note that this certainly isn't the first [linuxjournal.com] popular Linux laptop.)
Re:A day late and a dollar short in my case. (Score:1, Interesting)
To say none of the trouble that's untrue. It's easy to deal with to be sure, but it's still not as flexible or as high performing as Linux on x86. (or PPC for that matter).
Personally the custom enviroment I make for myself thru X windows' infinate customizability is far better for MY purposes then anything I can get from OS X.
Also besides video drivers (nvidia) Linux is going to still be more stable. Finder still has some nasty lock-up habits. But it's not as bad as Windows, definately.
Re:HP makes good printers, nothing more. (Score:4, Interesting)
this is nice, but... (Score:5, Interesting)
1) IBM needs to get their act together and offer Linux support, at the very least, for their laptop line. Their hardware is mostly supported already, but it shouldn't be necessary for me to pay the extra amount for a licensed copy of Windows XP, which I'll never use just to get a well-built laptop. What's more, they're advertising linux for enterprise use, and enterprises use laptops. I don't see how moving to linux couldn't be anything but good for them now, overall - or at least moving in and helping linux laptop development, so that it is soon mature enough for IBM to start offering it at a corporate level on laptops.
2) It would be nice to start getting a little bit better kernel and X support for things like suspend and power ACPI. At the very least a listing somewhere on manufacturer's sites saying, "hey, our hardware needs this specific version of software to work properly if you run Linux" - it's often difficult to find definitive information on such topics, and people will often get things working when others are not able to for odd reasons. Personally, hard or soft suspend do not currently work for me w/ kernel 2.6 and X 4.3 running the dri-trunk debs - on current sid - on my X30. Returning from suspend results in X being borked, requiring a reboot to fix. (Anyone that has information as to why this is occuring, or what the fix might be, and I'd appreciate hearing from you...)
3) Wireless support. I'm not talking solely about drivers, as those have improved significantly* and are on the right road, but wireless tools for useland. As far as I know, it's currently fairly difficult (via waproamd, the only thing I've seen to do this) to get a wireless card to 'roam' from network to network as you go from, say, home or work. There needs to be a good userland tool for this.
4) * The wireless drivers in the kernel itself are still pretty shitty and minimal, and wlan-ng sucks horribly. The hostap 2.x drivers are a significant improvement over the other two in every regard (as far as I've seen), but actual support in the kernel really should be improved.
5) power management tools don't seem to work too well. It's quite possible that I'm simply ignorant on the matter, but tools such as cpudyn and cpufreqd do not scale the processor's speed dynamically when losing AC power, or gaining it again. In my experience, the daemons need to be restarted manually.
Linux Certified Stickers, SWEEEET :) (Score:2, Interesting)
Now that HP is getting their certified laptops out there I feel that rest of the manufacturers would also start geting their act together. After all people who buy these things and run Linux on them are probably the people who'll recomend these computers to their Joe Sixpack friends. I can't count how many times I recomended a computer or a piece of hardware based on how well it worked with Linux, just so to support the cause and support companies that acctually use standards and are not biased towards a certian OS.
Re:WTF? No Wireless or DVD+RW? (Score:1, Interesting)
I go thru a laptop about every 6 months, and I can honestly say this is the best I have had yet. I've tried IBM, Sony and Dell, and would rate them in that order. Bluetooth, A/B/G, 1394, and a nice screen (get the 15" upgrade).
I should also mention that I'm using WinXP; Sorry SlashDot, XP works great for me.
Interesting... (Score:3, Interesting)
Linux is NOT ready for the desktop (Score:1, Interesting)
What are you smoking? Linux is ready for the desktop like windows 2 was ready for the desktop. Its clunky to configure, has issues with even common hardware (many manufacturers still refuse to ship Linux drivers), comes with an RTFM mentality for support, and requires you to fiddle with initialization scripts. What's more open office is a poor replacement for MS Office, and the same is true where there are apps to replace the industry standard.
Linux is NOT ready for the desktop. We need to wake up to this and grow up. We have to stop patting ourselves on the back for the "good enough" lookie what we did for free operating system (and if you don't like it you're stupid). What's more you can't goof off and play as many games on it as on windows.
If Linux was ready for average the desktop user, people would be making the switch in droves. New users and children would never touch windows. The proof is simple - this HP computer shipping with Linux supported is the exception not the rule.
We need to do MUCH MUCH better!!!
Mod me how you want but you know its true.
Re:Ahhhhh....One Second Please (Score:3, Interesting)
Why.
Becuase is linux is already installed on the beast by the vendor, all the hardware will just work(tm).
I can buy it and get on with being productive with it, rather than spending a lot of time getting it all configured, installing kernel modules etc only to discover that some vendor has claimed to ship a particular piece of hardware, but has in fact shipped something else which they have renamed. Eg Dell shipped me a SoundBlaster Live! in a desktop that had been butchered so it wouldn't work with Linux. Waste of money, or if I send it back a waste of time & hastle, (which is also money.)
If it works out of the box, there's a good chance that upgrades will work.
I'd be happy with a Laptop with no OS installed that the vendor assures contains linux supported hardware. Having an OS installed is just a really great statement to re-inforce the fact that "this is Linux compatible and no we aren't kidding."
Loving HP's work on this.
Anyone got a link to the online store? Seriously.
Re:Worth the price for Wireless (Score:4, Interesting)
This laptop definitely runs Linux well and is definitely hardy enough to withstand some abuse. When it finally does give out you can bet I will be replacing it with one of HP's preinstalled Linux laptops.
Documentation? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Worth the price for Wireless (Score:5, Interesting)
Linux distros are getting really good at supporting wireless, actually. Just make sure that your wireless card is supported by the kernel.
I got a Cisco card (uses the airo driver), and Fedora Core 2 works with it just fine. To configure the WEP, I just chose "Network Configuration" from the "System Settings" menu (it's in both the GNOME and K menus, depending on your desktop preference).
Up pops a GUI tool where you can enter an SSID or choose "auto" and where you can select key length and enter a WEP key. Entered it, clicked Apply, and voila, I was up and running with my wireless network.
All GUI tools, no hardware/driver issues, to a 128-bit WEP network.
Re:Good News Bad News (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:A day late and a dollar short in my case. (Score:3, Interesting)
Is this the same HP that... (Score:4, Interesting)
Next time, I'm leaning toward a nice IBM notebook, mostly because they've been standup guys lately where Linux is concerned, and HP CEO Carly Fiorina has been making a lot of noise about DMCA crap on all HP products. Just how the hell are they going to lock up a Linux notebook with DRM?
I'm glad that HP is shipping a Linux notebook PC, but this isn't some corporate altruism. The only reason for an HP Linux notebook is they see the writing on the wall and don't want to follow the next wave. You know, the big wave, where Linux sweeps over the entire planet?
I'm disappointed it's not Debian based (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm disappointed that it isn't Debian. IIRC, HP has a representative on the Debian Desktop project. The worst part of working with Debian is the install and hardware configuration (both of which would be done for you here; just add a recovery disk and a few CDs as a local apt-get repository and off you go).
I would seriously consider a preinstalled basic Debian for a dual boot system with XP Pro. With Suse, I would just get XP Pro and add Suse afterwards...the preinstall isn't as helpful.
Debian is also free beer, which would allow the price to be lower than its MS Windows equivalent.
OT: HP printers (Score:2, Interesting)
I've worked with monochrome HP laser printers since laserjet II, and I would say they peaked around LJ4 or LJ5. The new ones are pretty much crap in comparison.
Good news, but ... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:But can I... (Score:3, Interesting)
Quote from the top of every HP hardware page, in big bold letters:
"HP recommends Microsoft® Windows® XP Professional"