North America's Fastest Linux Cluster Constructed 325
SeanAhern writes "LinuxWorld reports that 'A Linux cluster deployed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and codenamed 'Thunder' yesterday delivered 19.94 teraflops of sustained performance, making it the most powerful computer in North America - and the second fastest on Earth.'" Thunder sports 4,096 Itanium 2 processors in 1,024 nodes, some big iron by any standard.
Very great and all... (Score:5, Interesting)
"Most" powerful (Score:5, Interesting)
vs google (Score:2, Interesting)
Another Article (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:"Most" powerful (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I'd hate to be the guy... (Score:2, Interesting)
Second fastest on earth? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:apple's response will be interesting (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:apple's response will be interesting (Score:3, Interesting)
Lets see what the VTech system does with ECC RAM installed when some node's aren't double-checking other node's results.
Re:apple's response will be interesting (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:"Most" powerful (Score:3, Interesting)
There are many purpose-built supercomputers coming up (like Sandia's Red Storm) that use custom yet pricy interconnects that end up smoking anything Quadrics can put together. Anytime your interconnect relies on a PCI-type bus, you take a latency penalty on each end. Real supercomputers access memory on other nodes directly, not through a generic shared bus to a fancy network card.
Read some of this if you're bored, it goes through Sandia's entire thought process. http://www.lanl.gov/orgs/ccn/salishan2003/pdf/camp .pdf [lanl.gov]
Re:apple's response will be interesting (Score:2, Interesting)
At the time - this was a study done in July/Aug 2003, remember - the speed of the G5 and the Itanium2 were similar for the same clock speed (for scientific calculations; before someone flames me with something off topic, remember that this is a very particular kind of application); then what happened was that Intel was simply "out-clocked"! Kind of funny when Intel was the big champion of "clock-speed" over AMD, Motorala and IBM.
This was in a presentation by VTech at an O'Reilly conference; coverage for this with several articles (including
http://www.macdevcenter.com/mac/osx2003/
Re:Did hell freeze over? (Score:3, Interesting)
-B
Probably OT, but... (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course... (Score:3, Interesting)
300 processors. Thats 150 dual-processor boxes. I can't be bothered working it out now, but how far that goes to eliminating the power & heat advantage the G5 has would be interesting to find out...
Re:Very great and all... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Did hell freeze over? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Very great and all... (Score:3, Interesting)
The It2 probably cost around 5 times as much as the opterons, so a real comparison would be 32 It2 processors vs 160 Opterons. With the scaling shown for that model, the Opterons of equilivent cost would be 2-3 times faster than the Itaniums.
Re:Nah, but who knows what the NSA has cooking. (Score:2, Interesting)
They can design all the custom chips they want with their rather large budget.
Your forgetting (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:before everyone starts shouting at once... (Score:2, Interesting)
However your post, and my post, are wasted on