USA Today and NYT on Linux rising 157
prostoalex writes "USA Today notices significant rise of Linux in the high-end enterprise environment. Although it doesn't provide obligatory pretty pictures, the paper mentions the projects at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and NASA. Also if you've missed the New York Times Google article of the day, the expose on John Doerr from Valley's venerable KPCB talks about venture fund investing $12 million in LinuxCare. NYT quote: "That's a freight train I wouldn't want to get in front of," said Mr. Doerr, explaining the importance to having a stake in a Linux-based venture. "Probably get run over.''"
begs the question ... (Score:4, Interesting)
Or is this just Silicon Valley Russian Roulette all over again?
Big corporations (Score:5, Interesting)
I am not intrested in IBM urging SUN to gpl Java as IBM *easily* could provide assistence to the GNU Classpath project. And what about Jikes?
Or Nat Friedman's anti-KDE Fud machine. Novells Suse supports KDE and he will not change that committment.
Business stories may delight some reader, I found it rather unintresting.
I don't think that despite for propaganda reasons big business was of any real importance. When they want provide help it's letter stamp money for them. I would like to see a real committment, i.e. manpower, code and support. I am not intrested in campaigns from the PR office.
(While IBM's patent attorneys lobby in BXL for swpats...)
The best quote! (Score:5, Interesting)
At the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Wash., Linux has all but taken over, said Scott Studham, associate director for advanced computing there. "When I got here three years ago, there were circa 1,000 processors here, of which four ran Linux," he said. "Now there are circa 2,000 processors, and maybe 64 of them don't run Linux."
If this doesn't show that Linux has gained over the years then I don;t know what will.
Linux is future (Score:5, Interesting)
- Developer commnunity
- Intelligent software and equipments (Embedded software)
- Governments
- Expert level users
However, for common users linux still is away as
- For various applications, it is not yet common to have linux version and linux drivers
- Level of expertise (not that it is difficult but there always is resistance to change)
- Maturity in linux.
One thing is sure, linux march will prompt microsoft to do better in terms of price and quality.
Re:Old! :) (Score:5, Interesting)
The ISO format [cam.ac.uk] is YYYY-MM-DD. Big-endian, like how we write other numbers, or times. Sorts easily.
See the ISO date format campaign. [demon.co.uk]
An interesting alternative is to do what VMS does: 4-MAY-2004 No ambiguity when you spell out the month (VMS uses three letter abbreviations). But it's not culture neutral of course...
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Old! :) (Score:3, Interesting)
How would you normally write 16 minutes and 35 seconds after 3 pm? Either 3:16:35 or 15:16:35 (depending on 24-hour time being used or not). Here in USA we would say this time as "three-sixteen pm" or maybe "three-sixteen pm and 35 seconds".
The American format is annoying, I agree. (I'm American). In my computer data files and scientific notebooks I use format YYYY-MM-DD, and occasionally for frequenctly-created files YYYY-MM-DD-HH-MM (second MM is minutes). So that's why I had a problem with your system, as it would cause the exact same kind of problem.
A parent post above mentioned that the reason American date formats are like this is that we tend to say June 5th, and I guess Europeans and others tend to say 5th of June. But time here in USA is hour:minute (10:34). So the only real inconstincy in the American system is the position of the year, which should come first instead of at the end.
How would you write and say the time and date? I imagine it too would have inconsistencies.
True (Score:1, Interesting)
I see the goal of open source as being to make software a commodity, keeping profit-margins sensible and corporations down to size.
NASA Global Hawk UAV's will use linux (Score:2, Interesting)