Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Software Linux

U.S. Army Warns Microsoft To Back Off 635

declan writes "My CNET News colleague Ina Fried has written an interesting article today about how the U.S. Army has told Microsoft to stop sending free CD-ROMs of Office 2003 to government employees. In what's effectively a cease and desist order, the Army said: 'Your offer of free software places our employees and soldiers in jeopardy of unknowingly committing a violation of the ethics rules and regulations to which they have taken an oath to uphold.' Whoops! Perhaps this is Microsoft's latest way to fight free software at the Pentagon. Remember that just 8 months ago, the Army paid $471 million for Microsoft licenses."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

U.S. Army Warns Microsoft To Back Off

Comments Filter:
  • donate to schools (Score:3, Informative)

    by tedshultz ( 596089 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:29PM (#8527672)
    I remember there was a commotion about gifts being given to employees at a VA hospital near me a few years ago. Basically the result was the management said any gift worth more than ~$20 must be given to a charity. I bet a lot of schools and charities would love that software.
  • by eodtech ( 225994 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:40PM (#8527765)
    I work for the USAF as civilian and DoD sent out a email about this. Microsoft knows darn well that Govt. Employees cannot accept this software as they have been a Govt Supplier for years!!!!
  • by SmackCrackandPot ( 641205 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:41PM (#8527778)
    Microsoft has recently been sponsoring the Imagine Cup worldwide. The winners of the first stage each receive free copies of Microsoft Visual Studio .NET and Microsoft Office XP, plus an exclusive T-shirt.

    Here is the UK Web site [microsoft.co.uk], Canadian Web site [optamedia.com], and US Web site [imaginecup.com]
  • by WorkEmail ( 707052 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:43PM (#8527801)
    The ARMY can't help with the AOL cd's, but there is a few organizations that are trying to. There is one arganization that is trying to collect a million of them (probably the amount that AOL delivers to ONE Barnes and Noble location alone..lol) and then send them all back ot AOL headquarters. Click here to check out www.nomoreaolcds.com [nomoreaolcds.com]
  • by rindeee ( 530084 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:48PM (#8527840)
    I just returned from days of meetings that involved folks from the NMCI group, NSA, NIST, DoD, NAVSECGRU , CyberCorps and lots of others. I can assure you that within this area of the Fed (cyber-warfare, crypto, security, intel, etc.) that MS is a laughing stock. In the past this hasn't mattered terribly, but you have to understand that now things are very different. NSA/NIST (partnering as NIAP) now set the standard that all other agencies from the CIA down to the Dept. of Ag MUST follow. They establish the common criteria, define new directives and standards, etc. etc. aud nausiem. While MS isn't being thrown out, they are being gelded. It is a matter of time until the attitude held by these folks permiates the Fed as a whole. Linux is being pushed not becuase it's free, but because it's more readily secured. Much talk was bantied about on lots of OSS packages. I personally gave an impromptu class after hours to some of the less technical folks on installing and using Thunderbird + Enigmail + WinPT (GPG). Perhaps Linux/OSS truly is viral. It certainly is spreading as if it were. Keep the faith my friends.
  • Re:I got one! (Score:3, Informative)

    by Bull999999 ( 652264 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:48PM (#8527842) Journal
    I'm not suprised. Exchange 2003 Server deployment guide is just an advertisement for Windows 2003 Server and Outlook 2003. Sure, Exchange 2003 can run on Win 2000 SP3 but if you want to use all the features, run it on 2003. Sure, Exchange 2003 can serve older Outlook clients, but if you want all the features, get Outlook 2003.
  • DoD rules on Gifts (Score:5, Informative)

    by eodtech ( 225994 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @09:55PM (#8527896)
    The $20 / $50 rule is one of the key rules on employees accepting gifts from sources outside the government. This information paper is designed for employees of the Department of Defense (DoD).

    1. General rule against gifts. DoD employees are generally prohibited from accepting gifts that are from a "prohibited source" or that are offered "because of the employee's official position." [5 CFR 2635.202(a)]

    2. Definitions. The definition of "prohibited source" includes companies and organizations that do business or seek to do business with DoD. [5 CFR 2635.203(d)] A gift is offered "because of the employee's official position" if it is offered because of the status, authority or duties associated with the employee's Federal position. [5 CFR 2635.203(e)] "Market value means the retail cost the employee would incur to purchase the gift. An employee who cannot ascertain the market value of a gift may estimate its market value by reference to the retail cost of similar items of like quality." [5 CFR 2635.203(c)]

    3. Exceptions. There are about 30 exceptions to the general rule against gifts. One exception, which is called the $20 / $50 rule, provides that an employee may accept gifts of up to $20 in market value per source per occasion, so long as the total market value of the gifts received (under this rule) from one source does not exceed $50 in a calendar year. [5 CFR 2635.204(a)] One may not accept cash under the $20 / $50 rule. [5 CFR 2635.204(a)]

    4. Examples. Here are two examples of gifts that may be accepted under the $20 / $50 rule. First, an employee who gives a speech as part of her official duties may accept a thank you gift having a value of $20. Second, an employee may accept three $16 lunches from a DoD contractor in a calendar year.

    5. Buying down to $20. If you are offered a gift that has a value over $20, you may not "buy the gift down" to $20. [5 CFR 2635.204(a)] For example, if you are offered a $21 ticket to a baseball game, you may not pay $1.00 to whomever is offering the ticket, and then accept the ticket under the $20 / $50 rule.

    6. Combining items. If you are offered two separate items on the same occasion, and each item has a value under $20, and the items together have a value over $20, you may accept one of the items and decline the other. For example, if you give a speech as part of your official duties, and you are offered a $6 coffee mug and a $15 pen as thank you mementos, you may keep one or the other, but not both. [5 CFR 2635.204(a)(Example 2)]

    7. Different sources on the same occasion. Under the $20 / $50 rule, you may accept gifts of up to $20 in value "per source per occasion." This means that the $20 limit applies separately to each company or organization that is offering you a gift on a particular occasion. Here is an example from the ethics regulation.

    During off-duty time, an employee of the Department of Defense (DoD) attends a trade show involving companies that are DoD contractors. He is offered a $15 computer program disk at X Company's booth, a $12 appointments calendar at Y Company's booth, and a deli lunch worth $8 from Z Company. The employee may accept all three of these items because they do not exceed $20 per source, even though they total more than $20 at this single occasion. [5 CFR 2635.204(a)(Example 5)]

    8. Impermissible gifts. If an employee receives a gift that cannot be accepted under the $20 / $50 rule (or any of the other gift rules), the employee must do one of the following (unless the item is accepted by the agency under specific statutory authority). If the gift is a non-perishable tangible item, the employee must either return the item to the donor or pay the market value of the item to the donor. If the gift is a perishable item and it is not practical to return the item (such as flowers or a fruit basket), the item (at the discretion of the employee's supervisor or ethics official) may be given to an appropriate charity, may be sha
  • Re:$20 Limit... (Score:4, Informative)

    by Vellmont ( 569020 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:02PM (#8527953) Homepage
    How is the value of software intangible? The lowest price I see for the full retail version of Office 2003 is $350 on pricewatch. Other places list it for $500. That sounds like a very tangible price to me. Intangible when talking about value refers to things like the value of the brand "Coca Cola". It's intangible because you can't assess a real value for it.

    Your MSDN subscription price means nothing. According to the website [microsoft.com] an MSDN subscription costs $2799, and $2299 for a renewal. Kind of a bit more than $500.
  • by Camel Pilot ( 78781 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:03PM (#8527963) Homepage Journal
    Well the Navy has sold its IT soul to the NMCI contract [eweek.com] that stipulates that all desktops and servers and office productivity tools will be MS products. All others will be classified as "legacy" applications and will be schedules for rehosting. This includes all things that touch the network - databases, webservers, etc.

    As the deployment is progress they are finding that people do more then send email and write word documents and they have to leave some of the existing infrastructure intact and many have two desktop machines - the nmci email kiosk and the other machine where work gets done. This neither lower costs or inceases security - both goals of the contract.

    Also if they are successful the Navy will be a sitting duck with a monoculture IT infrastructure and a successful exploit will be able to cripple it in short order.

    The NMCI contract is the largest IT contract ever and you hear scant little about it in the press. I sure hope some watchdog group or even the GAO start monitoring the progress of this contract.

  • by barzok ( 26681 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:16PM (#8528038)
    There are no nuclear portions to see, aside from maybe the weapons store. The USS Kennedy (CV-67) is conventional, not nuclear-powered.
  • by TekGoNos ( 748138 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:36PM (#8528173) Journal
    Yep universities are their main target.

    First MS Academic licenses cost close to nothing (something like 500 bucks for ALL MS products for an ENTIRE departement).

    Second, they like programming contests too.
    I still have this unopened, sealed box of Windows XP Pro that MS gave to me for winning a local (just my university) programming contest in 2002.
    Somewhat funny as the contest was hold on machines running Linux :-)

    And at a conference for students last year, they were giving away Visual Studio .NET Professional.

    Just like drug dealers : the first is always free.
  • by rot26 ( 240034 ) * on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:40PM (#8528198) Homepage Journal
    My productivity will fall to zero when they take my legacy machine away, but it WILL happen. They have determined that nobody is using the NMCI machines BECAUSE the legacy machines are still available. They are fully aware that the NMCI network is pure shit, but the only way it will be fixed is when people actually USE it and start opening trouble tickets to address problems, and the only way people will use them to find these problems is when they no longer have legacy machines. I expect to walk into my office and find it gone any day now.
  • Flight Sims on Linux (Score:5, Informative)

    by sbaker ( 47485 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:46PM (#8528233) Homepage
    I design flight sims for the US military - our older products are on IRIX, our newer ones are Linux-based. Not an M$ system in sight - they just don't cut it for flexibility and reliability.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:54PM (#8528275)
    I also work for SPAWAR in an aquisitions branch, but evidently not under the same center as you, since we pay out the nose for each and every MS product (and everything else) we buy. GSA pricing is usually a joke - we end up paying retail for virtually anything IT related. The problem with alternatives is not one of user ability, because as one of the above posters mentioned, the right linux distro would work just as easily as Windows for most navy users. The problem is change (of any kind).

    With very few exceptions, we buy nothing but Windows and Intel for PC aquisitons, since woefully few of the senior engineers and scientists (who really dont deserve those titles anymore) know any different. Since it is so hard to fire a govie, the govt. is bloated with people who haven't meaningfully increased their techincal skillset since they graduated from college in the 70s.

    SPAWAR, at least, recognizes their problem and a few people with a clue are trying to change things. They are trying to clear out some of the good-old-boy cruft and the stagnant dead weight. Some of the fresh-outta-school new professionals (myself included) are trying to exert what little influence we have to push for some alternative platforms and architectures in the work place. I have a few linux boxes up for internal uses and am working on a mosix cluster, among other things. Not much, but I guess its a start, and the bigwigs are starting to take notice.

    We joke that if some monster new windows worm went tearing through the network we would be the only ones with functioning computers. Unfortunately, its probably not so far from the truth.
  • by TrancePhreak ( 576593 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @10:55PM (#8528283)
    The new version of Outlook has a lot better spam protection, for one. There's a lot of things here and there that they made better. You don't see them until you actually use the program, but they're there.
  • Microsoft... (Score:4, Informative)

    by bferlin ( 642337 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @11:00PM (#8528323)
    I'm sure this has been said a few times... but as an IT manager, I've already recieved three copies of Office2k3... one was sent to the last IT manager before me, one was sent to a name resempbling slightly mine (I never registered with them, but they call plenty to have figured my name out from other people at my company) and one for the Vice president right above me. It has to be apparent to EVERYBODY that the only way they can get lock in is to get as MANY people using thier software whose file formats are unreadable without the software. How do you do that? You get a few executives who may or may not have computer experience to use it, they send files to people who can't use them, and suddenly they say 'Well, IT, why can't they open them?' ... you say 'Well, because you have the newest version and they're using the old version/the Open version.' ... voila. Suddenly the upgrade is hurried because you can't see the one new feature that VP wants that the other copies don't do. I'm sure people still realize that the reason nobody bought office 2k for so long was because there was backwards compatability. People didn't need to upgrade until outlook 97 became a virus trap and you had to upgrade just to get rid of it. Now they need to start the lock-in again. I'm sure people all over the world were seeded with this software in an attempt to continue the cycle...
  • by Artemis ( 14122 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @11:27PM (#8528566) Homepage

    Typical Slashdot drone again. The .doc file format and .xls file format (the two most popular) did not change from Office 97 to Office XP (2002). Five years and three version of Office, no changes. The only reason the file format has changed in Office 2003 is to take advantage of XML. Of course, if they hadn't updated it to use XML you would be bitching about that also, saying how they don't "support new technologies" or innovate in new version. You should really try doing some research about these things before you blindly bash them. Microsoft also makes the schema available for FREE [com.com] and offers Royalty-Free licensing of their specific implementations!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @11:34PM (#8528611)
    One thing the CNET article fails to point out is that the federal ethics rules governing gifts to federal employees are government-wide, not just for DOD, Interior or any other agency.

    That includes the $20/$50 gift limit ($20 for a single gift, $50 total for all gifts from a single source in a given year). All of this is administered by the Office of Government Ethics, an independent agency that used to be part of the Office of Personnel Management, another independent agency.

    http://www.usoge.gov

    The applicable regs are here, in S 2635.201:
    http://www.usoge.gov/pages/forms_pubs_o therdocs/fp o_files/reference/rfsoc_02.txt

    Or there's a handy cartoon pamphlet:
    http://www.usoge.gov/pages/forms_pubs_o therdocs/fp o_files/pamphlets/phgiftsfrmout_98.pdf

    I had to learn all about this because I used to work for a publishing company that was going to launch a magazine for federal workers that we were going to give to them for free ... and we basically could only $49.95 for nonfederal subscribers because that way the federal employees were only excepting a "gift" of that amount.

    Now I work in a small consulting shop. Microsoft has a program and gives us *everything* for free for our internal use because they want us to push it onto our clients. I'm talking Office, Server, Exchange, Project Server, whatever. Some of the big-time VARs and integrators get deals too.
  • by Night Goat ( 18437 ) on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @11:45PM (#8528682) Homepage Journal
    Do you work for Mailboxes Etc.? I used to, and our dream was to one day send something out SonicAir. Nobody ever did. One mention of the price tag, and that idea was out of the question. But after that job, at my new job, Dell once sent us something Sonic Air. I showed my boss the receipt, and she was happy to see that people do occasionally use the service.
  • Re:HUGE NO-NO (Score:4, Informative)

    by thewiz ( 24994 ) * on Wednesday March 10, 2004 @11:46PM (#8528693)
    IIRC there may have been a monetary cap on what you could accept but it was really low; even legitimate things like Christmas baskets or company tchotskes were frowned upon, which kind of weirded out suppliers the first time they dealt with the military since it could come across as rude when an Airman tells you to take your fruit basket home with you.

    I've worked as a contractor to the USAF and it's the same for contractors as it is for the military: no gift over $10.00 in retail value may be accepted as a gift from a vendor. Things like mouse pads, coffee cups, items that would be considered swag at a trade show, etc. If it's over $10.00, then you have to politely return the item and notify your manager/commanding officer. What Microsoft is doing is considered to be an attempt at BRIBING a government official/representative. They've been working with the government and military long enough to know this. It sounds like Microsoft still thinks the rules don't apply to them.
  • by AstroDrabb ( 534369 ) * on Thursday March 11, 2004 @12:00AM (#8528777)
    This is the dumbest crap I have ever read on /.

    It takes less time to get a random high-asvab grunt up to speed on a windows NT based system than on a linux system.
    Do you have an evidence to back up that claim? Any studies? Documents? Or are you just making up crap as you go?

    "Sir, the guy we pulled in after the 6 shop got bombed is saying 'what the fuck is this %> stuff all about?'"
    I guess there is no such think as a GUI under Linux? I take it you cannot write GUI [gnome.org] apps [kde.org] for Linux? All taks need to be done from a terminal? You are very "Insightful" aren't you?
  • by Kevin_Peters ( 698630 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @12:17AM (#8528863)
    Ok, then. Create a file in Office 2000 or XP and try to open it in Office 97. Can't do it. Why? Because the format DID change. Microsoft does NOT support backwards compatibility. never have and never will.
  • by tuxedobob ( 582913 ) <tuxedobob@mac . c om> on Thursday March 11, 2004 @12:31AM (#8528940)
    I'm willing to bet that the army, et al. can't accept gifts of ANY kind from ANYONE. Accepting free anything makes it seem like the army is taking bribes. That's a domain reserved for politicians.

    Seriously, though, I work at a fast food restaurant. We're not supposed to give free or discounted anything to any government official (police, health inspectors, etc.) even in good faith, or in kindness, because it makes it seem like we're bribing them. The one exception is donating sandwiches to the fire department's fundraiser/awareness day thingy.
  • by AnalogDiehard ( 199128 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @12:40AM (#8528999)
    I used to work in a classified secured area.

    Military and classified networks are walled fortresses with complete isolation from the internet world. They do not tolerate breaches of this nature that puts classified data at risk. If even a laptop enters from the outside world, it will not leave without a complete wipe of the hard drive, memory, and any other removable media. No exceptions.

    M$ Office Product Activation phones home over the Internet. That's a no-no in a classified secured area.

    Someone at M$ is going to get das boot.

  • Re:$20 Limit... (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 11, 2004 @12:45AM (#8529021)
    This holds true for many federal and state employees actually.

    Of course, there are many people who simply don't pay attention to that.
  • by Deven ( 13090 ) <deven@ties.org> on Thursday March 11, 2004 @01:40AM (#8529319) Homepage
    What an insult... what a great way to piss off a group of people the military desperately needs to retain. My question was this: If they think I'm enough of a whore that I'd sell out my patients for the price of a pen, why even trust me to take care of people?

    The pharmaceutical industry spends billions of dollars on various freebies for doctors -- free pens, free post-it notes, free lunches, free samples, etc. Invariably, the doctors receiving this largesse are utterly convinced that their behavior is unaffected. Of course they don't believe they're selling out their patients, or they wouldn't accept.

    Instead of getting your feathers ruffled at the indignity of the implied accusation, stop and use your brain for a minute. Billions of dollars in freebies. The pharmaceutical industry isn't spending that because of their love for doctors. Obviously it works. The industry is getting a good return on their investment, or they wouldn't continue spending those billions, year after year. They see the big picture, unlike the highly-educated physicians who fall for the scam.

    I'm glad to hear that the military is anal enough about the gifts doctors receive to insist that they refuse a 5-cent pen. Need a pen? Get one that isn't emblazoned with a brand name working its way into your subconscience. Obviously the cost isn't a problem, is it?

    More doctors in private practice should follow the military's lead on this. Sure, everyone likes free stuff, but doctors make life-and-death decisions and should hold themselves to a higher ethical standard. Health care is too important to be so heavily influenced by marketing -- and anyone who can't see the influence of pharmaceutical marketing is just fooling themselves.
  • by thedbp ( 443047 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @02:02AM (#8529423)
    i'm definitely not an MS fan, and i try to use their software as little as possible. unfortunately VLC can't play all the WMF files I run across, so I have to use their player. I use AppleWorks or TextEdit for most of my home (very basic) word processing.

    But I have to say there's some great new features in Mac Office 2004. Word has what looks to be a really neat note taking mode, with full audio recording capabilities as well.

    Here's a link [macworld.com] - although MS's WinTel products may be shite, the MBU does some really nice work.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 11, 2004 @02:18AM (#8529489)
    Closed hardware also means when you buy more machines, you buy them only from your sole supplier. And that's a big deal to many of us.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 11, 2004 @02:22AM (#8529510)
    Want to know where all that money for MS licenses went?
    https://ascp.monmouth.army.mil/scp/index.js p

    Here's the way it works. An IMO (Information Management Officer) counts up how many systems they have/need licenses for. They then login to that site and click on how many desktop licenses they need. They then put in the local DOIM/NSC POC info in there and click SUBMIT. The local DOIM/NSC POC gets an email saying that their licensing has been approved. They then burn them their CD copies of the software. They way I do it is I burn a CD that has ALL the current hotfixes/patches/service packs for both Office and Windows XP rolled up into it, and I automatically install antivirus software and poin t it to our AV servers and our SUS servers. Secure form the get-go and all the IMO has to do is type in a computer name and join it to the domain. Easy and fairly secure.
  • by Prof. Pi ( 199260 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @02:54AM (#8529634)
    I know a guy who used to wotk at MS. He said it was deliberate policy to make new versions not quite compatible with older versions. Of course, you could always "save as" an older format, if you don't mind clicking through their warming box (which always comes up, whether or not you used any features that won't work in the old format).

    But, he said, they were supposed to make sure it didn't work 100% of the time. If users of older versions couldn't read your documents maybe 1% of the time, you'd chalk it up to "inevitable" software problems (which you'd assume were normal and unavoidable, since you were a Microsoft user) rather than a deliberate attempt to get you to upgrade. Eventually you were supposed to get tired, and just give up and upgrade.

  • by Gadget_Guy ( 627405 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @03:16AM (#8529719)
    Where I work we still haven't upgraded our Office from Office 97. Everytime a new version comes out we have a look at it to see if there are any new features that we need, and everytime the answer comes up negative.

    Our business relies on being able to transfer documents to and from our clients. Occasionally we have a problem with having an old version. It tends to be when someone has embedded some ActiveX thing that we didn't have. It is so rare that this happens that nobody ever suggests that we should upgrade.

    One of our satellite offices upgraded to Office 2000 (without permission) to fix a perceived problem that they had when opening files sent from outside the company. We didn't know about this until a long time afterwards. In the meantime, we transfered documents backwards and forwards between the offices and never had a hitch.

    On the other hand, occasionally we have our own documents get corrupt and crash Word as soon as they are opened or printed. In those cases, I fire up OpenOffice and resave them in that. Works every time. Sometimes having a different suite can get around the bugs in the old 97 code.

    Eventually we will upgrade. When we do, I am hoping that it will be to OpenOffice. There are a few things that still need to be fixed in OpenOffice before we can use it, some of which is to do with file compatibility with the Microsoft format. I am hoping that I can convince management here that it would be in our interest if we got the source and help make the changes that we require. They are actually quite eager to use Open Source stuff that I think that they will get the concept of giving back to the community.

    It is still cheaper than upgrading all our Microsoft products.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 11, 2004 @03:18AM (#8529723)
    Right now, MS Word documents can be read by other word processors, including the Linux ones. The new MS Office will make any document created, opened and saved in it require the new Office to open it.It will no longer be readable by any other processor.

    With the great inroads open source software is making into Microsoft's market and profit (85% of their profit comes from Windows and Office), why else do you think they would push the latest Office so much and not mention features at all?

    The biggest new feature is one they don't want to talk about, incompatibility.

    My desktop is being converted to Linux and other open source software, especially as Macromedia announced this week that they will be making their products fully compatible with Wine under Linux,beginning with Flash.

    Bye bye Bill. The harder you squeeze, the more of us slip past your heavy hand.
  • by Chordonblue ( 585047 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @03:38AM (#8529802) Journal
    Believe it or not schools get quite a break on pricing - particularly if you are part of a large district.

    On the other hand, our school went to StarOffice three years ago. Cost? $79. For the entire school. Every computer. And OpenOffice.org for the boarders. Under the new StarOffice 7 licensing terms I can even give THEM a copy if I wanted.

    We were one of the first schools to move to Open/StarOffice however and not too many more have yet. Why? MS Office is 'cheap'!

  • by lightray ( 215185 ) <tobin@splorg.org> on Thursday March 11, 2004 @04:42AM (#8530001) Homepage
    That's true... I worked at a DoD-funded research facility where we were compelled to deliver a product that ran on Windows NT simply because that was the Navy requirement. The in-house development was done in Linux and we deployed on cygwin... sigh.
  • by zero_offset ( 200586 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @08:10AM (#8530582) Homepage
    Bullshit, pure and simple. I know a LOT of people who used to work for Microsoft. I knew some of them WHEN they worked there. I know people who STILL work there. I've also had several ex-employees end up there, and remained in contact with them. And what you're saying has NEVER come up, and these are the kind of hardcore developers who would be completely enraged by such a stupid policy.

    Either you're lying, or the person you claim to know is lying.
  • by Da VinMan ( 7669 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @08:23AM (#8530624)
    Well, the reason is that Office 2003 contains some very streamlined hooks into all Microsoft's new server products. Upgrading the Army to new versions of Office, even at an illicit grass-roots level, would bootstrap Microsoft's efforts to sell all the new server products. This includes Sharepoint Server, Content Management Server, Windows Server 2003 itself (of course), and Exchange Server 2003 (of course, of course). And, of course, if you use those products you'll naturally consider other new server products they're offering. Of course...

    Consider this move of theirs with Office 2003 to be viral marketing at its best. Office itself still makes them a lot of money, but they know that they'll lose office desktop market share at some point if people can easily switch away from MS Office to other office products (which is getting easier all the time). So, if they make sure that there is tight integration between Office and their server products, you'll get locked in and won't (easily) be able to move off of Office, much less Windows.

    But, what Microsoft forgot about gov't agencies in general, is that grass-roots marketing is a no-no. Strict hierarchies do not appreciate circumvention, especially where budget impacts may occur because of it.
  • by TAiNiUM ( 66843 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @10:32AM (#8531234)
    http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123007021

    Free software must be returned

    by Staff Sgt. C. Todd Lopez
    Air Force Print News

    2/20/2004 - WASHINGTON -- Air Force people who have received a promotional copy of a popular office productivity software suite, are instructed to return it to the sender.

    The Microsoft Corporation sent promotional copies of its popular "Office" software to a half million customers -- some in the Air Force. The commercial value of those software packages, more than $500 each, exceeds Joint Ethics Regulation limits for personal gifts, said John Gilligan, Air Force chief information officer.

    "Our ethical regulations govern the acceptance of gifts from those who do business with us," Mr. Gilligan said. "The value of those packages is well in excess of what Air Force members can accept, in particular since we are customers of Microsoft. In the public sector we are not allowed to accept that type of gift."

    Mr. Gilligan said Air Force members who received the promotional software are obligated to return it to Microsoft.

    People may return the software by re-sealing the packaging, marking it "refused delivery -- return to sender" and taking it to the post office. Mr. Gilligan said if the post office refuses to take the packages, they can be turned in to local communications squadrons.

    "Our installation communications squadrons will be collecting the packages and mailing them back as a group," Mr. Gilligan said.

    The policies regarding acceptance of gifts are in place to protect the Air Force from undue influence by organizations it does business with. Mr. Gilligan said the principal desktop productivity suite used in the Air Force comes from Microsoft. He also said the service is in negotiations with the company for additional product licenses.

    While it is unethical for employees of the public sector to accept gifts, Mr. Gilligan said the Air Force does not believe Microsoft had any ill intent.

    "This was simply a marketing campaign that Microsoft undertook where they failed to understand the impact of sending free sample software to government employees," Mr. Gilligan said. "I think it was just an oversight by not realizing the ethical restrictions we are under."
  • by sgtrock ( 191182 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @11:40AM (#8531891)
    ROTFLMAO!

    Obligatory HHTTG reference:

    "With any luck," Ford Prefect muttered as he fell asleep, "The long distance charges will force them to go broke."

  • by DataPath ( 1111 ) on Thursday March 11, 2004 @01:05PM (#8532948)
    I was referring to something a little less direct in terms of consequences. EDS brings in some new jobs for the local administration of their contract, but most of the jobs existed before, just under another contractor.

    ALl the money that bases used to spend at local businesses for computers, office furniture, etc., that used to be supporting local businesses, now basically goes to EDS corporate.

    And the good reason for spending the money in local businesses is that these bases are not taxed. Therefore their tax dollars don't go to pay for anything. I grew up in a town that existed ONLY because the Navy built a base there. Most of the employed population was employed by the base. Taxes on businesses are what fund the schools, and with so many people and so few taxable businesses, the schools were in really sad shape. By having the base buy locally, there's that much more money being taxed to support the local economy and schools.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...