Mandrakelinux 10.0 Community is Available 348
joestar writes "The new 'Mandrake Linux 10.0 Community' release has just been announced. It provides many new features including Linux 2.6.3, MagicDev, KDE 3.2, GNOME 2.4, a new Mandrakeonline service and others. Download ISOs are available through torrent for Club Members and 10.0 developers. A 10.0 DVD is also available at MandrakeStore. This a first step for this new exciting Mandrake, because in May, an Official version will appear, and both versions will officially be supported. Happy downloads!"
First major distro with 2.6 kernel release (Score:5, Interesting)
Here's my question: Are 2.6 kernel changes going to affect "Joe User"?
That's what UserLinux is for (Score:4, Interesting)
I have long thought that Linux needed an analog to Microsoft's once very-useful MultiMedia PC standard.
Might be worth a look... (Score:3, Interesting)
When are non-member ISO's.... (Score:3, Interesting)
-- D3X
NeoX3.com: The One Site for Free Adult Entertainment [neox3.com]
Which version of KDE 3.2? (Score:4, Interesting)
Seems awfully fast for Mandrake to have already included the 3.2.1 fixes (multimegabyte).
This is one of the reasons I like Debian, even if I have to wait longer for some (major) things than bloody edged distros like Gentoo.
Where can non club members get it? (Score:1, Interesting)
Any torrents for non-club members?
Re:First major distro with 2.6 kernel release (Score:3, Interesting)
DVD? (Score:1, Interesting)
Read/Write Support for NTFS? (Score:5, Interesting)
lvm1-lvm2 (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Which version of KDE 3.2? (Score:2, Interesting)
In this way, they are offering the best of both worlds, the Community Release, which is fairly stable, much more so than cooker; or for those who need a rock solid release that's been tested for several months, there's the Official Release.
I'd expect to see KDE 3.2.1 updates available shortly, and then of course it would be in the 10.0 Official Release.
Re:First major distro with 2.6 kernel release (Score:3, Interesting)
x86-64 support? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Read/Write Support for NTFS? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Noteworthy.... (Score:5, Interesting)
wasn't there only 1 RC before the final? (Score:4, Interesting)
Chris
Re:First major distro with 2.6 kernel release (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Read/Write Support for NTFS? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:The All New Mandrake 10! (Score:5, Interesting)
Slackware is more a geek's distro, whereas Mandrake is pitched more at n00bz. Slackware is good for customising {if I was being unkind, I'd say you have to customise it to make it usable} and runs well on less powerful systems; whereas Mandrake is purposely designed so that you can just slot it in and go, but it needs a fast machine to show off what it can do.
The sort of person who installs Slackware is probably an old hand with several years' Linux experience; more likely to be mellower and less outspoken than the first-timer. Mandrake is a good choice for a beginner, and it has a very loyal and vocal band of followers.
But just because Mandrake is aimed at the newcomer, it is no less powerful a distribution -- and it doesn't compromise on security. In its own way, it's a very hardcore distribution {there's one for the apostrophe nazis}: everything in it is open-source {unlike some distributions *cough* SUSE *cough*} and there is a real emphasis on community members helping one another with their problems.
Re:This is a strength! (Score:3, Interesting)
Compiling everything from source has traditionally been a ball-ache. If someone can find a way to alleviate that, then they could be on to a winner; but I get the feeling that the market for a user-friendly but source-based distribution will be very fragmentated at first.
Re:My experience with Mandrake (Score:2, Interesting)
Mandrake....It just works. (Score:2, Interesting)
I'd imagine 10.0 will be a step even further in the right direction. Mandrake is leading the way in the desktop linux environment. This is good for other distros because it raises the bar.
Slightly OT OOo Speed (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:The All New Mandrake 10! (Score:4, Interesting)
By most counts, I'm a power Linux user. I first installed Linux on a system back in 1994. I've contributed a kernel patch. I have installed at least five distributions, two of which are Gentoo and Linux From Scratch.
In the end, both for my home computer and my work computer (where I develop Linux and Windows software), I settled for Mandrake. I got tired of having to deal with config files and having to install drivers when I plug in new hardware. Mandrake handles this all pretty seemlessly for me, moreso in fact than Windows does. These days (though this was less true in the past), the software packaged with Mandrake is fairly recent and quite stable. That said, I did install KDevelop 3.0.1 from source rather than from Mandrake's packages.
I still run Debian for my email/web server at home. In fact, I really like Debian. Its dependency resolution still has everything else beaten. But it doesn't offer such features as the Mandrake Control Center and other such happy Mandrake tools. As a result, I'm quite happy with my Mandrake installations, at least for desktop and workstation systems.
A friend of mine pointed out that he switched operating systems (to OS X, in his case) because he wants something that just works. He doesn't want to spend time reformatting, reinstalling, and dealing with configuration files, at least no more than is absolutely necessary. I find Mandrake offers me this now and that is why I use it.
Re:The All New Mandrake 10! (Score:2, Interesting)
Long live Mandrake!!!
Re:Mandrake is back in managerial trouble (Score:2, Interesting)