The Voice of Groklaw 198
Random BedHead Ed writes "LinuxPlanet has an interesting interview with Pamela Jones, the paralegal and blogger who created Groklaw. Groklaw has become an indespensible site for geeks who need even more SCO updates than even /. provides - and if the site's inclusion in the footnotes of one of IBM's court documents is any indication, it's been handy for people involved in the case as well. No wonder the site won Best News Site in O'Reilly's OSDir.com Editor's Choice Awards for 2003. It shows how useful and influental a well-run collaborative website can be."
Re:Pictures? (Score:0, Informative)
Re:Grokking McDonalds Coffee Lawsuit (Score:4, Informative)
A minor correction (Score:1, Informative)
The coffee in the lawsuit was 180 degrees, not 130 degrees. That is still well short of the boiling point, however (and within or below recommended serving temperature for coffee)
For some odd reason someone in the Appeals court thought it was dumb to stick a cup of known hot liquid in your crotch and blame someone else when it spilled.
And, for some odd reason, people here try to get us to forget this most important fact by trying to snow the issue with lies from ambulance-chaser web sites like Vanfirm.com
Re:Do more research before your start trolling (Score:5, Informative)
As long as you didn't accidentally spill it on yourself, in which case you required skin grafts and 10 days hospitalization.
Sorry, dude, but you must be using a different dictionary for the phrase "perfectly safe" than the one I use.
"She spilled the coffee, McDonald's did not."
McDonald's heated it to over 180 degrees, possibly much higher, given the pressure it was kept under. Not the customer.
And I'm not sure what universe you live in where 180 degrees is "well short of the boiling point", maybe one where Vonnegut's Ice-9 is commonplace, but here on Planet Earth the boiling point is 212 degrees at sea level, and lower at higher altitudes, so I'd say 180 degrees is pretty close to boiling.
Re:Coffee temperature reality (Score:4, Informative)
That's bonkers. 185-200 might be a good temperature to *prepare* the coffee, so it doesn't get scalded, but that's *way* too hot for drinking.
I urge you to test this for yourself. Please take photographs, so we can all fall off our chairs laughing at your self-inflicted third degree mouth burns.
140 degrees, give or take 10 according to taste and tolerance, is about the best temperature to serve coffee.
"grok" is from "Stranger in a Strange Land" (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Pictures? (Score:2, Informative)
It's not right. Pamela lives somewhere in the Northeast, not in Minnesota.
There are no pictures of PJ on the Internet, as far as I know. She likes to guard her privacy as much as is possible under the circumstances.
Re:I think you overrate this SCO thing. (Score:4, Informative)
Unless you care about copyright abuse. I'm a North Carolinian and have had several discussions with John Edwards staffers in Raleigh, and he's completely in the pocket of the MPAA/RIAA.
Take it from a tarheel - pass on Edwards.
Re:Coffee temperature reality (Score:3, Informative)
Sure.
212 F = 100 C
180 F = 82.2 C
140 F = 57.67 C
In other words, "Tort Reformer AC" is arguing that 85 - 95 C is the proper temperature at which to serve coffee (185-200F), whereas everyone with common sense is telling him that's nuts, and that 50 - 60 C is probably a better temperature at which to serve coffee, although even that's a little too hot to drink. But we all prefer it a little on the hot side, cince it will cool down before you finish it.
Actually, once you put it all into degrees Celsius, it becomes even more obvious how clueless "Tort Reformer AC"'s arguement is.
Re:"grok" is from "Stranger in a Strange Land" (Score:3, Informative)
Cheers to Merriam-Webster [m-w.com].
I would prefer to be a nerd [candy4u.com]--at least they make better eating.