SCO Gets More Desperate; Sends More Letters 449
isn't my name writes "The New York Times is reporting that SCO has sent new letters to Linux-using businesses with specific examples of infringement. SCO has its fiscal earnings call scheduled tomorrow at 11am. In all probability, these letters are designed to get analyst/reporter interest focused on their claims instead of the numerous fundamental problems with their case. So, slashdotters, we need to find a copy of the letter and tear it apart with specificity before tomorrow morning in the US East Coast, so that any analysts/reporters will not be distracted."
SEC? (Score:2, Funny)
Do-Not-Mail List (Score:4, Funny)
That applies right? I don't want their telemarketing, "Register your copies of linux for only $699 per CPU"
Isn't that why Congress passed the anti-telemarketing bill right?
What next? (Score:5, Funny)
Here is the Letter (Score:5, Funny)
W3 0wn j00
r3g4rd5,
D4r1 Mcki1dd13
GOOD IDEA!!!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Half News, Half Propaganda? (Score:5, Funny)
I disagree. Logic dictates that to be a wanker you need to have a dick, it's not enough to be one.
Re:Comic relief (Score:5, Funny)
Re:NYT arcticle (for he privacy concerned) (Score:5, Funny)
Indeed, a difficult question. The paper is probably far too hard and scruffy for the obvious use, unless you've got an unusually thick-skinned arse...
On the other hand, however, the letter certainly makes some nice kindling for the fireplace ;-)
Re:Tomorrow? (Score:4, Funny)
A speaking clock is "2, Informative" nowadays?
I wonder if the poster would even pass the turing test!
Re:Why do they -need- this response from their 600 (Score:5, Funny)
I Am Now Eating A Pie.
I'm not sure why the orignal poster felt the need to inform us of his diet though.
65 files! (Score:5, Funny)
Excuse me, I meant to say 65 files that have been copied verbatem into the Linux kernel.
And no, I cannot actually show you the list. Revealing the files would compromise the ability of our brave pattern matching experts to compile further lists.
Good Night, and God Bless Unixware.
Re:Comic relief (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Why do they -need- this response from their 600 (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why do they -need- this response from their 600 (Score:5, Funny)
Chewbaca defense! (Score:5, Funny)
How can they be distracted? Just look at SCO's case:
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk who carried a gun and ran from the mob. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it. That does not make sense. Why would a Wookiee, an eight-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor with a bunch of two-foot-tall Ewoks. That does not make sense.
But more important, you have to ask yourself what does this have to do with this case. Nothing. Ladies and Gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case. It does not make sense. Look at me. I'm a lawyer trying to prove SCO's case and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca. Does that make sense? Ladies and Gentlemen I am not making any sense. None of this makes sense.
And so you have to remember when you're in that jury room deliberating and conjugating the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No. Ladies and Gentlemen of this supposed jury it does not make sense. If Chewbacca lives on Endor you must find Linux guilty of copyright violation and find the GPL invalid.
I know SCO seems wrong. But ladies and gentlemen this is Chewbacca. Now think about that for one minute. That does not make sense. Why am I talking about Chewbacca when a worthless software company's life is on the line? Why? I'll tell you why. I don't know. It doesn't make sense. If Chewbacca does not make sense you must agree with SCO. Here look at the monkey, look at the silly monkey.
Re:GOOD IDEA!!!! (Score:5, Funny)
So what you're saying is basically that we should Slashdot the stock market. Wouldn't that be considered a DDOS on capitalism itself?
SCOX Is the ticker symbol (Score:2, Funny)
I have decided to short 400 shares a bit above $19.00. This is the biggest scam since ENRON.
Currently long NOVL (SuSE).
Betting on Linux. Wish me luck?
65 header files? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Let's not rip them apart financially (Score:5, Funny)
you must aquit.
Re:quote discussion (Score:5, Funny)
Anyone else think "Pay us, or we'll hit you with olive branches!"? Could be quite painful - I'd comply if I received a letter like that...
Re:Just a simple question (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Chewbaca defense! (Score:3, Funny)
Translation: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:What next? (Score:3, Funny)
I must register my disapproval of this acronym expansion. I strongly resent being compared to SCO. You should not even be suggesting that SCO would do anything nice.
Re:Make the Press Work For US (Score:5, Funny)
Re:DMCA? (Score:2, Funny)
Well, that depends on what the definition of is is.
Re:quote discussion (Score:2, Funny)
Wow, that sounds familiar. Does this letter come in a brown paper envelope with the words "Important customer information inside" emblazoned in red across the front?
Oh, wait, that was from my auto finance company. Nevermind.
Re:Why do they -need- this response from their 600 (Score:3, Funny)
Legal analysis of Sauron's Offer and acceptance [qiken.org]
Change a few names, and it sort of fits in a weird way
Dear SCO (Score:3, Funny)
legal money's worth? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Not a Single Reply (Score:4, Funny)
Sub, meaning below.
Poena, referring to the projective portion of the male genitalia.
And thus, we discover the true meaning of the word sub-poena -- "below the projective portion of the male genitalia"... or, in more common parlance, "by the balls".
Re:Why do they -need- this response from their 600 (Score:2, Funny)
"I Am Not Even A Proctologist"
Given that this was an SCO story, I could see how that would need clarification...