Low Powered Mini-Server for the Masses 351
ServerSam writes "Sudhian has a review up on EmergeCore's "IT in a Box" IT100. Designed for small business use, it comes equipped with a Transmeta Crusoe 533MHz, 128MB RAM, 20GB IBM TravelStar, 802.11b Access Point, and boots from a 32MB Flash card. The IT100 is powered by a 60 watt external PSU and is smaller than a PS2."
Ripping off (Score:3, Informative)
The things people get ripped off with these days.
Re:Already slashdotted... (Score:3, Informative)
Link here to the Sudhian Forum [sudhian.com].
If the current state of their server is any indication of this thing's performance, its sad
Re:Wish the link wasn't Slashdotted. (Score:4, Informative)
At $1150 (?) and odd, it really isn't worth it. You're better off building your own mail server from scratch. Cheaper and better than this.
Re:Slashdotted Already? (Score:5, Informative)
Enjoy
Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" (Score:4, Informative)
At $1,395 this is hardly a "mini-server for the masses". To me that implies personal use. This is the mini-server for small businesses.
Re:Wish the link wasn't Slashdotted. (Score:3, Informative)
Lots of small (but bigger than the MicroServer), low power machines at Mini-ITX [mini-itx.com]
They also believe (Score:2, Informative)
They also believe, or at least behave according to, the old chestnut "no one ever got fired for buying IBM" (substitute well known brand in any technology realted field for "IBM" to adapt this to any category). Those in large organizations don't want to take risks that will jeopardize their careers, but at least they are more likely to have IT departments to make recommendations. In small organizations, there is neither the in-house expertise nor often the willingness to spend on outside advice. While they may not know just how little they know, they calculate risk on the basis of what little they do know and they know the Apple and Mircrosoft brands.
Even lower power home server (for the tinkerer) (Score:2, Informative)
I purchased the device from embeddedx86.com [embeddedx86.com]. The model is TS-5400. You can see a picture of my finished server here [virosa.net] and here [virosa.net]. (It's in a boring-as-hell grey box... with a CD next to it for comparison - it's to the left of the access point)
It runs Apache (with PHP extensions), NAT masquerading, and provided me with a great introduction to embedded systems (it's architecture is almost identical to standard x86, so it's an easy starting point). Even though it's much less powerful than the transmeta powered box in the article, you can still do a lot of useful stuff with it!
Re:Just think what a geek can do with $1100 these (Score:4, Informative)
Too much work for you? Go to geeks.com and pick up some refurb'd HP desktops for $500 each, with 17" monitors, CDRW, DVD-ROM, 120-160GB disks, keyboard, mouse, fucken speakers fer chrissakes... and a ~2.2 GHz celery chip.
The fact is that the vast majority of people have space to put a full size computer for a server. It's only in very unusual environments where space matters so much that your only server must be smaller than a shoebox. Aside from such special cases, assuming anyone buys this device, it will mostly be people who don't understand computers, and think it looks really neat.
Re:My 486 gateway is only 24 watts! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Slashdotted Already? (Score:4, Informative)
hrmm
Overall recommendation: Recommended
Editors' rating: 7.6 out of 10 (Good)
Setup and ease of use: 8 out of 10
Features and security: 8 out of 10
Performance: 7 out of 10
Service and support: 7 out of 10
Okay, I guess I'm stupid. 5 out of 10 would be average, more than that would be positive, and an average of 7.6 puts it in the top 25%.
When did anything less than 9 out of 10 become crappy?
Re:More info on your LCD vs CRT comment... (Score:1, Informative)
LCD's do have some limitations. They cannot do true white. They therefore cannot do colors accurately. If you are doing desktop publishing you won't be using an LCD monitor.
CRT's and LCD's both have pretty high resolution ceilings but LCD's will cost you a lot more to get there. Here at school we've got some IBM LCD monitors that go 3400 x 2400 or somesuch but are over $8,000. A comparable CRT will still run you a couple thousand.
Latency issues with LCD monitors can be an issue and it is noticable. CRT does not have latency problems but many people claim with newer / more expensive LCD monitors it doesn't bother them even when gaming. I'm a little sensitive but thankfully I don't game.
LCD monitors have accurate geometry. A square is a square. CRT monitors need to be calibrated for accurate geometry and the picture can become distorted over time or by a magnetic field. This can be very important depending on what you're doing.
LCD monitors have significantly less radiation than CRT. They also produce significantly less heat and consume less energy. A 21" CRT can warm a room.
Basically it comes down to this. Unless you do pre-press desktop publishing there's probably an LCD monitor for you. The costs are about the same now and the reasons to go LCD largely outweigh the reasons otherwise not to.
Re:Not just size (Score:2, Informative)
Here's [viewsonic.com] a few.
Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" (Score:3, Informative)
I've been a Linux user for over 10 years, and I've used X Windows on PC's for 9 years, but it still took me two entire days to get X Windows to work on the Via garbage. You don't even get the source to their X Win driver so you have to upgrade or downgrade to the version of X Win that they demand you to. For us, we have a company standard to use Debian, so we can't use Via boards. Where my wife works, they use a newer version of X Win for their ERP software than Via allows you to, so they can't use them. Via is shooting themselves in the foot and screwing customers and dealers in the process with their proprietary garbage. The Newegg manager's statement was the reason I expected.
Comment removed (Score:2, Informative)
Re:"The IT100 did it all at a cost of $1,395" (Score:3, Informative)