OSNews Rates Fedora Core 1 Mild Disappointment 510
JigSaw writes "OSNews has reviewed the Fedora Core 1 Linux distro, but the author personally found lots of usability problems and bugs with the distro, making Fedora Core a trying experience. The writer puts the blame on poor QA of Fedora Core 1 done by its community, since Red Hat has shifted focus to Enterprise, with Fedora serving merely as a testbed for them."
Fedora is buggy indeed (Score:1, Interesting)
Oh, well, back to Debian...
Not bad for a V1... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Usability Issues (Score:3, Interesting)
Corporate Improvements! (Score:5, Interesting)
Sure, Red Hat Enterprise Linux will be all but bulletproof and stable, but what about those of us who aren't using linux to displace Solaris or NT Servers?
What about those of us who want to do a little Gimping or serve our home LANs? At the risk of drawing the fire of the distro zealots, this is the precise reason why I switched to Mandrake at about the same time as RHAT's IPO.
LK
Fedora Fine for Me (Score:5, Interesting)
I just want to give a big THANK YOU to the whole Fedora team. The release had its problems but I am happy with my setup!
No offense to Eugenia (Score:5, Interesting)
But I wish there were more people writing distro reviews. OSNews seems to be one of the few sources that get any play on here, ( heck, they may be one of the few sources full stop ), and it would be nice if we could get some variety of opinion / requirements / analysis from a variety of different viewpoints.
The gaming, productivity and utility software industries have hundreds of review sites spanning all over the web, and while I recognise that individual distro releases rarely represent as big a market impact to Joe Public as, say, the latest iD game, it would be nice to see a bit more heterogeny.
Just another thought - these reviews all seem to have to rush themselves, and rarely have time to evaluate long term issues or strengths that arise after a bit of persistant use ~ an example has been the recent rave reviews in the print media of Panther, which I adore, but had several showstopper bugs in .0 which nobody seemed to pick up on until they starting munching on user preferences for breakfast.
YLFIp.s. Worst run on sentance ever.
Use it properly. (Score:5, Interesting)
a) So, the first thing she does is install a third party RPM and then wonders why it blows up in her face? How about the RPMs that came with the distribution? So, the install is brand new already broken in a VMWare installation.
b) Why is she using apt and synaptic? They don't even come with Fedora.
c) The RPM from Sun installs the JVM in all the Mozilla browser's (I didn't install KDE so I can't speak for Konqueror) and even integrates into the GNOME menu.
d) The well known limitations of Fedora's multimedia capabilities plague every linux distribution. It's not Fedora's fault that US laws suck. It's as easy to add multimedia in Fedora as it is in debian, you add one non-free source and you're done.
Here's a hint, if you're the kind of person that worries about moving from gaim
How will IBM deal with it if Fedora is a dud? (Score:4, Interesting)
Small site typically equates to "we want it cheap, we want it reliable and we want it now. Even though we're part of a big company, head office says we have to keep our costs very low. If we don't we shut up shop". Once you add up lots of small sites, they actually carry a bit of clout in a large organization; you'd better be able to deliver a solution that fits their needs if you want to retain that customer. Quite often, a small site exists solely to service one big customer; global HQ wants to keep that small site happy.
Non-enterprise RedHat fit the bill perfectly for small sites, but SuSE might be too expensive given the lack of a download-only release. I'd assume IBM was hoping Fedora might be a good substitute for non-enterprise RedHat, but if not, which way will they turn?
Re:What a shock (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't trust Eugenia either. She seems much more obsessed with screenshots and themes than anything else(such as usability).
Preach it, brother! (Score:1, Interesting)
I'm tired of the trying ordeal it is to upgrade Linux distributions. For the most part I've stuck with Red Hat, which is known as a fairly stable release. Yet every time I upgrade from one release to another, at least a dozen applications are broken.
I especially remember my attempt to go from RH7.3 to RH9. There were a number of things wrong, but the most important was that my sound driver didn't work. I found various patches, and recompiled the kernel about ten times. At last it sort of worked, but somehow it stopped recognizing my USB mouse! Combined with everything else, I abandoned it and went back to 7.3. That's a weekend of my life I will never get back.
Most recently I upgraded to Fedora, this past weekend. I had Crossover [codeweavers.com] and Real Player for Linux configured just fine before, but now neither will work. Annoying. Furthermore, the distribution "upgraded" to tetex-2.0.2, which contains a number of poorly documented changes in style behaviours. It took me a morning to figure out why; in the end I just used an old style file to make it work like before.
All I want is for it to just work. I don't want to suddenly find out that a driver is broken, or search around for six hours on Google to find a solution to some irritating problem with a package I use regularly. Until this happens Linux will not be ready for the desktop.
Linux has pissed me off for probably the last time. My next machine will almost certainly run OS X.
Regarding Redhat (Score:4, Interesting)
Microsoft has, in essence, infinite money to put into anything it wants. It currently wants the server market, badly. If they can control this then they will can make communications propriety and fulfill their dreams of world domination, thus have a total monopoly over the desktop and server as they can make them integrate seamlessly and become the sole designer of all applications that require the server-client model and beyond.
Linux currently has a fabulous market share within servers and the fight must continue to make these numbers higher. Spending all the time and resources on desktop issues, such as ease of use just is not the fight to be in right now. It's a fight that really, at the moment or any time soon, cannot be won. The fight for servers can be won.
The developers and contributers to Linux and Linux applications should be doing everything we can to make Linux the de-facto standard on the server. It would be foolish to not recognize our great fortune with our position in the server market. This is why I think Redhat is not only making a wise business move, but also one that will help Linux in general.
Re:Bah (Score:1, Interesting)
The theme doesn't make GNOME1 apps not using GNOME1 libraries, it doesn't make GTK1 apps not using GTK1, it doesn't make Mozilla getting rid of XUL in favor to GNOME2 or GTK2... and so on. The BlueCurve theme is just a lie to the customers.
The BlueCurve theme doesn't correct the button re-ordering in GNOME2 to be consistent with the KDE apps, Mozilla or OOo.
The entire technical framework below isn't changed with BlueCurve. I assume you have no clue otherwise you wouldn't have replied with that shit.
Fedora has some great technology (Score:3, Interesting)
...whatever supposed usability problems Fedora has, there's some great new technology behind it.
For example: they've got a new and shiny version of the glibc & NPTL. This threading support is worlds better than anything I've seen in other distributions or most other operating systems. I wrote a small test [slamb.org] for C++-safe thread cancellation support. It failed on pretty much every system I tried. Only Fedora Core 1 and Tru64 passed. This is a behavior more hinted at than mandated by the pthread standard at this point, but realistically, no one would ever use thread cancellation in a C++ program if it didn't work the way it does in Fedora.
There are lots of architectural improvements like that always thrown into a new RedHat release, and I think Fedora will be no different. It leads to their problems with x.0 releases, but I think it's worth it.
In my mind, Fedora Core 1 is RedHat 10 - the name + the community. It even upgraded from my RedHat 9 installation. That's a dead give-away.
Re:They've gone elsewhere (Score:4, Interesting)
Hell, the other day I reported a bug in anaconda that causes every single raid5 installation to be suspect to corruption, and so far, not even a reply. The most I've seen is that they added someone else's e-mail address to the bug.
Maybe it's not that no one files bugs. Maybe it's that people learned that filing bugs with RedHat was futile.
Re:They've gone elsewhere (Score:5, Interesting)
Look at what's happened over the last year - besides the Fedora merger, FreshRPMs, ATRPMs, NewRPMs, and Dag have combined to ensure consistent policy across their repositories. Yellowdog is now likely to become Fedora PPC too.
Developers who work on server software in particular (according to Netcraft and IDC Red Hat dominates in this area) might also be attracted to the 6 month release cycle of Fedora versus the perpetually updating and more bleeding edge testing or unstable.
Re:They've gone elsewhere (Score:3, Interesting)
(Whatever, it didn't solve the problem that I was trying it for, so I'm back to LibraNet Debian... with renewed appreciation.)
OTOH, if it works on your hardware, and is fast enough for you, then go for it. It has many nice features.
Yet again, I've heard some really good things recently about Mandrake 9.1, so see if you can try that version. (Presumably this means that they've fixed the holes that the initial release has...though I don't know for certain. Certainly my initial impression of 9.1 was better than of 9.2, but I no longer remember why.)
Re:bummer (Score:2, Interesting)
I'd recommend gentoo if you've been using RedHat on a basic level for a while (like I was) and you want to take this opportunity to challenge yourself a bit and learn more about how to really start configuring Linux.
Eugenia sure has a LOT of favorite OSes! (Score:1, Interesting)
Red Hat's Linux is still one of my favorite distributions because of one main reason: compatibility with Linux software.
But less than two months ago, in an earlier OSNews article [osnews.com], she said:
Slackware is my new favorite operating system along with FreeBSD, Windows Server 2003 and Mac OS X.
Hmm, no Red Hat in sight. And she even said:
I have tried more than 10+ different Linux distributions in the past 4 years but I never stuck with any. Red Hat/Mandrake/SuSE are too bloated and slow with complex internal structures (however Red Hat evolves faster of the three).
Wow, when's she going to make up her mind?