SCO Claims IBM/SGI Licenses are Revokable 378
shadow099 writes "SCO claims in an open letter writen by Blake Stowell, Director Public Relations SCO, that the Unix licenses to IBM and SGI can be revoked. " This is just the latest volley in the ongoing circus. It keeps getting funnier!
Somebody PLEASE put a bullet hole (Score:0, Funny)
It all started when (Score:1, Funny)
Funny? No, this is just sad (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Is it just me (Score:4, Funny)
Re:FUCKING MORON SCO EXECS (Score:1, Funny)
An open letter (Score:2, Funny)
Re:FUCKING MORON SCO EXECS (Score:2, Funny)
Hmmm...there is one worrying thing (Score:5, Funny)
There is one worrying thing, and I quote:
{Villain fingers pussycat}
If that's an accurate description of what Mr. Stowell was doing, shouldn't somebody call the RSPCA???
Am I going to have to separate you two? (Score:3, Funny)
IBM and SGI issued a joint reply stating "Nuh uh!"
Re:FUCKING MORON SCO EXECS (Score:4, Funny)
How cool would that be?
GPL and court damage. (Score:3, Funny)
Seriously I can't see it taking very long for the authors to re-group and patch the GPL to fix the issues.
If this truly were to happen I'd give it about 6 months before the GPL and all the code was re-released.
But wait! That would only happen in a properly working legal society. I forgot that this is all happening in New Berlin where the courts follow George W. Furer.
Or at least that's what he seems to be trying to make it anyway...
*blink*
Why are there black SUVs on my lawn suddenly?
Re:How intelligent (Score:3, Funny)