What Will Be in Linux 2.7? 494
Realistic_Dragon writes "The first discussion has been sighted on the Linux kernel mailing list to put together a feature list of things that should go into Linux 2.7 - including hotplug CPU & Ram support, network transparent sound and improvements to Netfilter to bring it up to the the level of OpenBSD's Packet Filter. And all this before most of us have started to run 2.6.0-preX, or even a 2.6 series stable release happening. Perhaps if you have a (sensible) idea now would be a good time to voice it, otherwise you will have to wait for 2.9 to get it included."
Good 64 bit support (Score:1, Interesting)
Multiple-kernel support (Score:2, Interesting)
Erm..Userfriendly UI? (Score:2, Interesting)
My main gripe with Linux has been that it's a bitch to configure for things that should't be so hard. Trying to get powermanagment to work on my IBM took me months and never worked right.
What I'd like to see... (Score:5, Interesting)
Nessisary Rewrites: SCSI, TTY (Score:3, Interesting)
Kernel Sanders (Score:3, Interesting)
Unified Installer (Score:2, Interesting)
Hardware detection (Score:2, Interesting)
Currently even fairly advanced users can get hung up trying to get hardware to work. Windows has a huge advantage in this area even though you usually need a cd of drivers.
Even better would be a way to build a kernel that detects and includes support for your hardware automatically.
Re:Hotplug CPU & RAM support (Score:2, Interesting)
If you're compiling a large program, your motherboard and OS support hot-swap, and you add more RAM, then yes, the next GCC process to execute will see the extra RAM.
Removing RAM, on the other hand, would probably need a hardware switch on the motherboard that swaps everything in that bank to disk.
Native Support for SATA Drives!!! (Score:4, Interesting)
PLEASE include native support for SATA!!
Ultimate flexibility and scalability... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What I'd like to see... (Score:4, Interesting)
Oh please. No doubt having had a different focus and so many years of time advantage, there are key areas where Solaris still trumps Linux. For instance, multiprocessor scalability (although it seems they sacrificed performance on 1-2 cpu boxes to acheive this result for their 64+ cpu boxes).
However, don't ever claim that Sun's kernel is in general superior to Linux. In a lot of ways Sun's kernel is ancient and crappy compared to Linux. Take a look at Sun's IP stack versus Linux's, for instance. Or how about lvm+softraid? When will Solaris stop relying on Veritas? (and don't answer diskuite, please). Or how about good integrated netfilter-like code?
While we're on it, let's talk hardware. The price
Re:Unified Installer (Score:3, Interesting)
A oft-requested but oft-ignored request. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Nessisary Rewrites: SCSI, TTY (Score:2, Interesting)