Reiser4 Benchmarks 414
A user writes "Hans Reiser has benchmarked Reiser4 against ext3 and Reiserfs 3. Reiser4 turns out to be way faster than V3, and for ext3, why don't you check out the results yourself ? Hans Reiser states, "these benchmarks mean to me that our performance is now good enough to ship V4 to users", and he will be probably sending in a patch within the next couple of weeks to be included in the 2.6/2.5 kernel."
The Paul Reiser filesystem... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Reiser4? Competition? (Score:5, Funny)
--
Sick of gentoo zealots throwing plugs in completely unrelated topics? Me too!
Not to mention the best software installation system ( portage ).
Re:Comparison (Score:3, Funny)
unfair - but true for me at least in the past (Score:4, Funny)
40.13(R4) 0.797 (ext3 journal) 0.837 (ext3)
woo-hoo! now it corrupts my data even quicker
Re:Reliability (Score:5, Funny)
I've found users doing that to my servers before now. I find that hitting them on the nose with a rolled up newspaper and shouting "No! Bad monkey!" in a stern voice tends to stop this behaviour...
Re:Reliability (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Reliability (Score:3, Funny)
Me too™ (Score:4, Funny)
The first thing that popped into my head when I read that was "uh... feature freeze two weeks ago." I'm sure Reiser's going to have another of his babyish hissy fits. I see another slashdot story in the near future.
<Reiser> Oh, what about my sponsors! Why are you all playa hat'n on me?
<EveryoneNotOnTheReiserCheerleadingSquad> You don't get special treatment. You waited too long, and we're not putting your untested code into a frozen code base.
<Reiser> You're oppressing me! The GPLv3 will fix you all!
<SomeoneFromFSF> Please shut up, Reiser. You still don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
<Reiser> Wahh!! My sponsors!
<Everyone> SHUT UP REISER.
Re:Reliability (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Computer's names translation (Score:3, Funny)
Re:ok (Score:3, Funny)
Really? The simplest way I found to move to reiserfs was to use Suse.
Re:Reliability (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Reliability (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Conversion? (Score:5, Funny)
In that case... (Score:3, Funny)
You should call the server "Kenny"!
As in Southpark: Oh my God you killed Kenny!
Re:Reliability (Score:3, Funny)
Try that with a non-*nix.
Aw, that's a non-issue. MCSEs are so cheap that it's no problem to always keep at least one MCSE within a 200 meter radius (300 meters if the MCSE is not overweight and under 30) from the system for 99.9% uptime.
Re:Reliability (Score:3, Funny)
Wow, that's a neat technique. He said nothing even remotely like your first sentence, but you claimed that's what he said so you could easily "destroy" his argument. Let me try:
If you're saying that Queen Elizabeth and her band of merry men is responsible for the block size on his RAID array then you have no clue how these things work.
How's that? Please teach me, O Master.
F**k Pavlov, use Skinnerian Conditioning (Score:3, Funny)
User: Um, I rebooted the box. Er, was that, like, okay?
You: Und so... Ve haff earned ourzelfs ein timeout in "The Box", hein?
User: Aiiieieieieeeie!
You: Mua-ha-ha!
[Fade to black]
Re:Computer's names translation (Score:2, Funny)
Apologies, couldn't resist (Score:3, Funny)
>>
>
> What are you waiting for! You'll be trying the 3ware cards in a couple weeks almost guaranteed
Is that a promise?