Details of Linux-in-Munich Deal Revealed 685
An anonymous reader writes "USA Today is running a piece about the lengths which Microsoft went to in order not to lose the government of Munich's account to a Linux-based proposal from SuSE. Interesting to see how these types of contracts are structured, and just what Microsoft is willing to give up to prevent losing to Linux."
from the guys who hit bill in the face with a pie (Score:5, Funny)
understatement (Score:5, Funny)
weird so do I
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Recent news... (Score:3, Funny)
"ooh...can't lose marketshare...can't lose marke-...gaahh!!"
Well, just goes to show... (Score:5, Funny)
Ballmer (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Mozilla? (Score:1, Funny)
Or: A completely bloated pile of horse shit.
The only feature I want from a browser is rendering pages correctly.
Seen in Munich (Score:3, Funny)
Hey Steve, where's your Moses now??
Quote from the article (Score:5, Funny)
What it means is "We don't know where to attack, because we can't buy them out"
Re:Well, just goes to show... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:My views on C++ (Score:1, Funny)
Steve Ballmer, Visionary, Dead on June 4 (Score:5, Funny)
More details to follow...
I love this story (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Well, just goes to show... (Score:5, Funny)
Actually, if it was Ballmer giving the speech I'm sure it would've been more like:
"Entwickler, Entwickler, Entwickler, Entwickler! Aaaaiiiieeeee, wooooooooo!"
Re:from the guys who hit bill in the face with a p (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Ballmer (Score:4, Funny)
Blamer (Bathed in sweat and stomping arround the room): "Berliners! Berliners! Berliners! Berliners! Berliners! Berliners! Berliners! Berliners! Berliners!"
Ude (looking quite confused): "For God's sake, someone get this freak a doughnut!"
Re:Wasen't Cost (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hmm.... (Score:4, Funny)
quick, someone call Fox.
we could call it "Contract Survivor" or something.
Microsoft won the homeland security contract (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Linux competitiveness. (Score:4, Funny)
Other costs (Score:4, Funny)
Re:But the next quote is even better (Score:2, Funny)
My fave quote is this one:
Ballmer ... suggested IBM adds an illusion of support and accountability to Linux.
I laugh out loud. IBM adds an Illusion of support? Gimme a break. IBM's support has, in my experience, been pretty darn good. Maybe we got a green tech from time to time, but at least they showed up and I could tell my boss IBM was on it. Management will usually take that for an answer.
What does Microsoft contribute in that arena? A fingerpointing game with the OEM?
I distincly remember waiting two years and five service packs just to get NT4's DHCP server fixed(*). Who do I hold accountable for the decision that integrating IE4 into the server(!) so I could view my server's desktop 'as a web page' (whatever that means) was more important than functional DHCP? Will they reimburse my employer for the *nix box they eventually bought to do DHCP, after having been promised that functionality in Windows at time of purchase? How about me, for my OT and aggravation, and having to explain to unreceptive Management that yes, the product they blew their budget on (against my recommendation) was defective and there was nothing I could do to fix it until MS patched it, which they were apparently in no hurry to do, so they had to spend more money to get what they paid for the first time?
At least I had the good sense to quit the next year when they shoved Outlook/Exchange Server down my throat. I hear my replacement spent a lot of nights and weekends cleaning up the worms and script attacks that I warned them were inevitable. Who at MS is 'accountable' for deciding that auto-executing attachments as SYSTEM was a good idea?
And people wonder why we hate Microsoft so much. After over 15 years working with (more like cleaning up after) their products, nothing triggers FUD in me like 'New from Microsoft.' Where'd I learn that reaction? Redmond taught me, the hard way.
(*) Well, DHCP did work as far as distributing IP leases from a block, probably looked just fine at the trade show demos. Problem was, once the block was exhausted and it wrapped around to the beginning again, it reassigned addresses without checking to see if they were still leased, knocking both users off the network and generating two support calls and two workstation reboots each time it happened. If you had to reboot the server for some reason (which in Windows, could be any minor change to anything), it started at the beginning of the list again, and every client on the network would need to be rebooted before the network would stabilize. MS support's answer: Don't use DHCP, use static IPs. They even suggested using Excel to track the assignments - yeah, I'm going to buy another MS product to replace the one I already bought that doesn't work. 'Illusion of support,' indeed!
Sure, Balmer's not exactly Kate Moss... (Score:3, Funny)
Microsoft , Linux, innovation (Score:2, Funny)
No, IANAMSE (I am not a Microsoft employee)!
Re:I love this story (Score:2, Funny)
rarely mentioned corollary: (Score:3, Funny)
Windows is only $100 if your time is worthless. (Otherwise it's much, much, much more.)
Treating Microsoft fairly... (Score:4, Funny)
1. When throwing an egg, ensure it's a golden egg.
2. Don't say Windoze sucks. Be specific. Say "Windows 95 is fast, but doesn't have USB. Win98 sucks bad, no security. WinNT4 is actually good - no wonder you withdrew support. Win2K supports USB, but breaks a lot of code. Win2K also gives us useless DRM. WinXP Home sucks, and doen't include networking. WinXP PRo sucks bigtime - lots of Spyware, builtin lousy fiewall, builtin DRM enabled CD writing s/w etc..........."
3. Don't say ".Net is complex" Say instead " Please explain
and so on... Be fair to them - they spend $5bn every year for R&D, generate lots of Linux jobs,make more people hate the US by their attitude and behavior, etc. Praise them for all this.
Peace.
-