Linux Rocket Blasts Off This Fall 327
HardcoreGamer writes "An Oregon amateur rocket group, the Portland State Aerospace Society, plans to launch a Linux-powered rocket weighing 12 pounds to 55,000 feet at a speed of Mach 3 in September, Wired News reports. The rocket's onboard computer is an AMD 586 processor and a Jumptec MOPS/520 PC/104+ board along with a power supply, a PCMCIA card carrier for an 802.11b card to transmit data to the ground, and a carrier board for a 128-MB CompactFlash card for long-term storage. The flight computer runs a stripped-down version of Debian Linux, with the 2.4.20 Linux kernel. The group will present a paper (HTML | PDF ) on the use of free software in rocketry at Usenix 2003. The real question is whether their network card will survive 10 seconds at 15 Gs!"
802.11b? (Score:4, Interesting)
Software (Score:5, Interesting)
But, I gather the greatest stresses will be on the computer hardware, as 10 G's will put a meaningful load on the parts, not to mention vibrational loads. And rockets are difficult to begin with. Here's hoping it works.
Ours is bigger. (Score:3, Interesting)
IANARS but... (Score:1, Interesting)
But as previously posted, what OS has been guiding rockets? Wind-SCO-s?
Just the 802.11 card? I'd worry about the rest! (Score:4, Interesting)
Yipes. High-altitude, high stress stuff is always a pain (which is why aerospace companies make so much money designing things).
It'll definitely be cool to see if this works. The paper's a little light on details of the design (for certain things - like the actual construction or parts choices - for other things it seems pretty detailed).
hardware reliability (Score:2, Interesting)
The only non-solid-state parts on the design are the connectors, which can handle hundreds or thousands of g's of acceleration without "bouncing" on the pins.
PC-104 is designed for high-stress applications such as this.
Re:IANARS but... (Score:5, Interesting)
Uhm, nope. You know there _are_ other OSs out there besides Windows and Linux. Sure, a post like that makes for good Karma, but for crying out loud, what is the exact value of your post?!
I will tell you which OSs have been running stuff like this; real-time, embedded OSs, such as VxWorks, QNX and all the others. Until recently linux SUCKED ASS for real-time applications. I don't think even Torvalds would mind me saying so. It just wasn't designed that way. There have been major improvements lately, which are all very promissing, but for applications that really demand real-timeness, probably very few people (in their right frame of mind, no offense) would choose Linux.
Re:802.11b? (Score:3, Interesting)
I seem to remember lots of people saying what use ham radio -
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/06/09/10342
If you got a ham licence how far could you listen to your music from your home server with a LEGAL power boost
Free software, open hardware, and collaboration (Score:3, Interesting)
Let me extend your comment with a concern of ours: the lack of technical collaboration between amateur aerospace groups.
When we started PSAS, there was very little posted on advanced amateur rocketry (especially avionics). Now there's a lot more, but for some reason many amateur aerospace groups either:
1) feel their technology is good enough to be proprietry (i.e., closed source), or
2) or they're too lazy to post their results.
Either way, the community loses and we have to slog through all the stupid mistakes in order to recreate what they've done.
This is incredibly frustrating - so when we started PSAS one of our goals was to always post everything we learned. We're open source, open hardware, and more importantly, open to the community: we're trying to collaborate with as many amateur groups as we can (in fact we've currently got collaborations going on with two other universities).
In fact, you should be able to recreate _everything_ we've done by following our history and getting the technical details (schematics, firmware, software, system diagrams) from our site.
So, to the BYU people with a _much_ bigger rocket
Contact us, let's collaborate.
I realize you are joking... (Score:5, Interesting)
Vibrations (Score:3, Interesting)
Not sure if they tested for this but if they didn't I think this particular rocket might not go too far.
Doppler effect? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Software (Score:3, Interesting)
not for launch guidance. hell I dont even need to have a computer or software for launch control.
all analog electronics with a simple gyro controlling fin servos, with a timer to click in an analog circuit to change angle of acent...
it's insanely simple... how do you think VonBraun did it in the 30's? certianly without digital computers.
Re:15Gs, no problem! (Score:3, Interesting)
drivers (Score:2, Interesting)
Try running windows on a Sun or Macintosh, see how well the drivers stack up then! We all know that a window sure as hell won't survive the G-Force.
To get this back on topic: Can an 802.11b card really reach the ground? I seem to remember that space is more than 300 feet away.
55,000 feet (Score:1, Interesting)