Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Red Hat Software Businesses Linux Business Software

First Red Hat Academy for High School 338

FrankBama writes "As a follow-up to the story of a few days ago, Red Hat has started a program in my old hometown. The story's at the News & Record. I love this part '...this training normally would cost more than $10,000. But Weaver students can get Red Hat certification free -- and use it get a job paying more than $30,000 a year right out of high school.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

First Red Hat Academy for High School

Comments Filter:
  • hehehe (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Billly Gates ( 198444 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:12PM (#5246865) Journal
    The highschool students would have to stand in line with the other college degree professionals with many years of experience to get any IT job. Even help desk.

    I had to leave IT and I have several years of experience. Thanks to bootcamps certifications are no more then peaces of paper. A paper is nice but its worthless without experience.

  • Thats too young! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Snosty ( 210966 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:17PM (#5246897) Homepage
    Its nice and all that they are trying to help highschool kids have a future after school but I don't think this is an appropriate choice for training. I have yet to meet anyone "right out of highschool" who has the intellectual maturity (notice I didn't say capacity) to function in a corporate position. This applies especially to positions such as Systems Administration where experience, wisdom and maturity are an absolute necessity.

    I know all the shit-hot teenage geeks out there are going to think I'm out of line for saying this (especially when they feel they are ready to take on the world). I'd recommend they go to University and expand their minds a bit even if they feel it is below them or that they wouldn't learn anything. Don't rush into being a wage-slave, kiddies, its not half as much fun as you think it is.
  • by rickthewizkid ( 536429 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:20PM (#5246926)
    ... but back then, I was learning DOS 3.3 (for Apple II) and AppleWorks, becuase "everyone in the future will be using this stuff!"...

    Anyway, I took that seriously, and made damn sure that I *knew* to enter the proper date when Appleworks was starting up, and that I *had* to make sure I had the right disks in the drives.

    (Interesting note: Even in Word 2002, CONTROL-B and CONTROL-L are for bold and underlining, respectively)

    Of course, we all learned how to use Apple DOS (both 3.3 and ProDOS) - we^H^Hthe rest of the class did this for a solid month, during which time I was permitted to play Choplifter, Cannonball Blitz, and Ultima V because I already knew how to use Dos... which *really* pissed the rest of the class off...

    Anyway, to get to my point, I wonder how relavent the things that they learn now will be a few years after they graduate - and I hope it is *concepts* that they learn, instead of cookie cutter "type CATALOG to see a what's on your disk, insert your disk and type PR#6 to start AppleWorks" stuff...

    -RickTheWizKid
    (Open-Apple-S to save, Open-Apple-P to print)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:21PM (#5246934)
    We would all be complaining and kicking and screaming right now. What's the difference between Redhat and Microsoft? In business terms nothing, they both have share holders to please. Don't become gullible to Redhat, they need to make money too. The only good thing is that they help tow the open source line and are successful in socio-economic terms.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:21PM (#5246935)
    more people without college degrees working in the IT field. I mean, shucks... Who needs emotional intelligence, improved social skills, exposure to a broad range of topics, writing skills, and all of that other silly things you hopefully pick up in college?

    Seriously, most of the H.S.-diploma-only folks I've ever dealt with in the professional world have chips on their shoulders. Ten times worse than those who went to Ivy League schools, in fact.
  • by adjuster ( 61096 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:26PM (#5246967) Homepage Journal

    But Weaver students can get Red Hat certification free -- and use it get a job paying more than $30,000 a year right out of high school.'

    Oh, sweet $DEITY. They could spend time taking college classes in high school, learning marketable skills that aren't tied to a particular manufacturer's contrivances of what a computer operating system should look and act like, learning to code, READING BOOKS, and end up far valuable "just out of high school" than a little RedHat, Cisco, or Microsoft drone. It seems a little premature (high school) to be focusing so heavily on something so specialized instead of gaining an appreciation and general understanding of computing.

    The kids that come out of these programs (I've got a "Cisco Academy" at a high school close by that I work with, and know people who teach at another high school that's been doing CompTIA "A+" training, and I've gotten to be around some of these kids) are mostly useless drones. The kids that really have potential are the ones that hack around on their own, have a genuine interest, and make something of themselves on their own. I'd take one (1) of them to ten (10) of these "cookie cutter kids". The training is just too specialized-- they can't handle something that wasn't "in the book".

    Don't get me wrong-- I think it's great that schools are expanding their technical training-- but don't expect these kids to be useful for much other than what they've been "trained" for when they get done.

    Those Cisco kiddies can sure make the patch cables, though. Snip-snip, crimp-crimp!

  • by yiantsbro ( 550957 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:28PM (#5246989)
    Vocational training in high school has always provided this type of opportunity. Right now we have IT certs like this one and the CISCO ones we have in my town (and they are grouped with the vocational classes). When I was in high school several of my friends leveraged their vocational training into 30K-40K jobs with various airlines as machinists. When my father was in high school, he leveraged his electronics vocational training into a good paying job (at the time) with the phone company (remember when all telcom was simply 'the phone company'?).

    One big difference though is the lack of unions in IT. Even through crappy economic times and corporate changes my father and friends from high school have continued to do alright--not great, but alright.
  • by adjuster ( 61096 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:30PM (#5247003) Homepage Journal

    This applies especially to positions such as Systems Administration where experience, wisdom and maturity are an absolute necessity.

    Ahh-- but the only true wisdom and experience comes from actually doing the work. Being a "junior" sysadmin or an intern under good people is the best training anybody can get. I try to take on at least one (1) intern every summer, and I encourage anybody who wants to see the median level of "suck" in our job field get lower to do the same...

    That is, unless you are a sucky sysadmin to start with... *smirk*

  • Re:Presumptions (Score:3, Insightful)

    by SuuSt ( 151462 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:31PM (#5247012) Homepage Journal
    Could this be compared to when linuxgruven (or whatever that linux certification training company was) guaranteed that you'd get a job (with them if necessary) after you got your cert?

    Not nearly as bad though.
  • by Zerbey ( 15536 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:34PM (#5247028) Homepage Journal
    I must applaud this school, and Red Hat for their efforts. I wish they did this 9 years ago when I was at school! I know of several schools in my area offering MCSE and Cisco certifications as well.

    I hope that the school is encouraging the kids to use this new knowlege as a jumpstart into college. Kids: $30,000 a year may sound like a lot when you're living with your parents but it's nothing once you have a mortgage and hungry mouths to feed! With a college degree you can command a much higher salary [1].

    A college placement is much easier to come by if you can say you obtained Linux certs in school and it'll give you a huge advantage over the other students.

    In writing this comment I have had one thought though. When are High Schools going to start teaching kids how to read, write and do arithmetic? I know plenty of people WITH high school dipolmas who can't spell, can barely read and need a calculator for basic arithmetic.

    [1] I'm also hoping that by the time current high school students graduate college the economical climate will have improved and jobs will become available for them.
  • Re:$30,000 a year (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:35PM (#5247038)
    Some quick math here....

    $30k per year with $0 direct education costs
    $50k pery year with $bigint direct education cost.

    Hrm. Doesn't sound that bad to me.
  • by puto ( 533470 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:39PM (#5247071) Homepage
    An engineer? What kind? Mechanical? Electrical? Give me the type please.

    There are very few jobs that you get right out of college paying 50k a year, I don't care what your GPA was, if you were student body pres, or blew the dean of men.

    I have 13 years tech experience, plus an IS degree, and two years doing tech work in Latin America(speak fluent spanish) I just got a job pulling 42 grand a year with full benefits. AND I AM DAMN GLAD OF IT. The job is in Louisiana where the cost of living is dirt ass cheap, so it is like 55 any where else.

    My friends who become engineers all, got jobs making 25-30k when they started out, and these are guys with GPAS from great school.

    A college degree does not guarantee you a 50k job, nor does a masters.

    And I hate to say it, but all my jobs looked at past projects and years on the job. Though the degree does open a lotta doors.

    A college graduate with a good 8 years under his built might make 50.

    You need a reality check.

    Puto
  • by dameron ( 307970 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:41PM (#5247083)
    Memorize this:

    Microsoft is a molopolist, it used or attempted to use its molopoly in operating systems to gain additional monopolies and destroy competitors.

    Redhat didn't.

    Think of it like a prison record: would you trust high schoolers with a convicted (and largely unrepentant) criminal?

    -dameron
  • by cybergeak ( 318482 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:52PM (#5247150)
    my highschool had 2 year Cisco program that started my junior year. I wanted to take it but had a class conflict. In the end it worked out for the best that i didn't take it because it was a 2 year waste of time.

    the instructor was the auto teacher who went through a 6 week course to teach a 2 year program. Any time a student had a question, the teacher didn't have a clue. After 2 years, not a single student was able to pass the certification test, or even think it was worth it to try.

    I got a part time job working the help desk at a local ISP/website development/network administration company my senior year. after working there for 4 months i knew more about router configurations than any of my friends in the 'holy' Cisco program. You can see why i feel highschool programs are bullshit now.

    Applying this to the Red Hat situation, Unless red hat hired and is paying the instructor, its going to be some math teacher, or shop teacher who got a book and a boot camp and he/she will be lost and the kids' time would be better spent reading stuff off of the internet durning a study hall.
  • by stratjakt ( 596332 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @09:58PM (#5247179) Journal
    >> And I'd hope that even a high school graduate could make more than $30k a year with a good understanding of Linux systems administration.

    You probably could. If you had a good understanding of systems administration in general. They wont. They'll have a bunch of general knowledge about how linux works and what some of the config files are for. If they're lucky they'll get to sit at a help desk. If they stick with the high school education alone and put in enough years, the annual cost of living increase might get them to 30k.

    This is a good learning base to move on to college, but nothing short of going to work for your dad is going to get you 30k as a 'redhad administrator' out of high school.

  • by moankey ( 142715 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:04PM (#5247209)
    With this type of scenario if it actually pans out we have the Las Vegas effect. Droves of people with decent paying jobs but little or no education (college wise), and a community demanding that people be educated and attend college.
    Why, when you get out of H.S. and work 4 years starting at $30K you still make more than your college counterpart in the long run?
  • by nvrrobx ( 71970 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:13PM (#5247249) Homepage
    Okay, I'm not a teenage geek, but I was.

    I know lots of adults that don't have the intellectual maturity to function in a corporate world, so there goes that idea...

    I will admit I wasn't the most mature person right out of high school, but I had a full time sys admin job. If I could have gotten training in high school like this, I would have jumped right on it.

    Believe it or not, spending 4-5 years in college isn't an option for everyone. Public high school is free (other than paying your taxes...) If we can help students be more productive right out of high school, I'm all for it!

    Not to mention, you might turn on a few students to a field they had never thought of. The exposure in high school is a great idea.
  • Am I wildly jaded (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ellem ( 147712 ) <{moc.liamg} {ta} {25melle}> on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:16PM (#5247265) Homepage Journal
    or am I right when I think you could make 30K at Walmart?
  • by the eric conspiracy ( 20178 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:30PM (#5247349)
    A college degree does not guarantee you a 50k job, nor does a masters.

    No, it does not guarantee anything. On the other hand, should you find a job in some engineering fields on graduation, the average starting salary IS $50K. For example, the AICHE reports that the 2002 average starting salary for various engineering professions was:

    * Chemical Engineering: $51,254
    * Electrical Engineering: $50,387
    * Mechanical Engineering: $48,654

    A college graduate with a good 8 years under his built might make 50.

    After 8 years of experience most engineers have been promoted twice and would expect a 30% increment at least over a fresh out of college employee. That would put such a person the the range of $65-70K.

  • by schmink182 ( 540768 ) <schmink182@yaBOYSENhoo.com minus berry> on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:31PM (#5247357) Homepage
    Being a "junior" sysadmin or an intern under good people is the best training anybody can get

    I'd have to agree with this. I work with the sysadmin at my school. A fair portion of the class time I work with him is spent fixing all the various problems pertaining to school computers / printers / network. That period is probably where I learn the most each day, much more than in Calc 3. Odd how the highest level math offered in the school seems less useful than those menial computer-fixing jobs.

  • by joshuac ( 53492 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:45PM (#5247448) Journal
    ---snip ... but back then, I was learning DOS 3.3 (for Apple II) and AppleWorks, becuase "everyone in the future will be using this stuff!"...

    Anyway, I took that seriously, and made damn sure that I *knew* to enter the proper date when Appleworks was starting up, and that I *had* to make sure I had the right disks in the drives.

    ---snip

    ---snip
    Anyway, to get to my point, I wonder how relavent the things that they learn now will be a few years after they graduate - and I hope it is *concepts* that they learn, instead of cookie cutter "type CATALOG to see a what's on your disk, insert your disk and type PR#6 to start AppleWorks" stuff...

    ---snip

    I'm totally with you, the way things are "taught" is a big pet peeve of mine.

    My school had a similar class to the one you describe, but for various reasons I never found my way into it. I was fortunate enough to have an Apple IIe of my own at home, with a few random reference books for various things. Instead of the rote class learning, I was teaching myself 6502 assembly (because I had a reference to 6502 opcodes and had found a way to get myself into the miniassember that came with Integer Basic), and learning the various subroutines that could be called in DOS 3.3. When I got my hands on 3.3E by begging and stealing from our nazi computer "teacher" at my elementary school, I remember the joy of decompiling 20 instructions at a time to get glimmer of what the minor differences were in the code. As time went on, I taught myself how to automate writing much of my assembly by using WPL, a very under-appreciated scripting language internal to AppleWriter II (well, Don Lancaster knew how good it is). Later, (once I had gotten my hands on the reference books) I taught myself the in's and outs of high level languages like Integer Basic and Applesoft; when I managed to sneak off with a copy of Apple Logo, I learned everything I could about that, because "it's fun to learn what makes things tick!"....meanwhile, the class learned the syntax of various DOS 3.3 commands.

    Anyway, I took nothing very seriously, at that formative age (10 years old) I had found a toy that had limitless possibilities, that could be reprogrammed to perform any task you could conceive. The class was being taught how to operate a tool within narrow confines of specific pre-decided tasks.

    Now, almost 15 years later, what I learned then on that Apple IIe was invaluable; what I learned that was truly valuable was not how to interface with a disk ii controller and count clock cycles for timing in my ML loops, it was that I learned something about learning. The class had learned how to be told what to do.

    The most valuable thing that IIe taught me is that you are fooling yourself if you tell yourself you "know" everything about a subject. When people say they "knew" DOS 3.3 because typing "catalog ,d2" showed them the contents of the second drive on the current controller, I realized they were selling themselves short; there was always more to learn; they didn't "know DOS". But since they assumed they knew everything, there was no room for them to learn more.

    The next most valuable thing I discovered was how to pull something apart and learn how it works, without a master plan in front of you. Too many people have been taught to "learn" by being shown an example, and then emulating. It's faster, it get's the grade school concert band able to push out a few notes in time for their parents to be proud during the winter concert, but rote knowledge is a poor subsititue for actual understanding. Type "pr#6" to boot off the floppy in drive 1, slot 6...does that actually teach you anything about what is going on, or are you just mechanically following directions? When all you learn is to follow directions, inovating when given an unexpected problem is very difficult. When you understand what is happening, you give yourself many more choices, and much more control.

    Anyhow, I learned many of the same subjects that the computer class at my grade school set out to learn. But I suspect that over time I got much more out of my learning experience than those students did, simply because of the way they were forced to learn.

    To make this slightly on-topic, does anyone know how the Redhat classes are taught? Do the teach you think unix, or do they teach you the syntax of commands?
  • case study (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:47PM (#5247459)
    It's funny, some people think $30k isn't anything, others think there's no way a HS grad could pull in $30k right out of HS with a RH cert. I'm going to be 20 years old in a few days, and here is my life in a nutshell. Perhaps it will give someone else insight as to the paths they might take at this early stage in life.

    At age 9 I mowed 3-4 lawns a day for a summer and bought my first computer for $400. I hacked on it 24/7. It has been to my benefit, IMO, that I have never been big on games, because boy are they a waste of time. I did a lot of QBASIC.
    I got my first job at a small (10 person) startup IT consulting firm at age 15, broke all child labor laws working 60-80 hrs a week (by choice mind you), and made $8/hr. My 1 year raise was $.25/hr. A few months later, I got knocked up to $9/hr. During this time I did mainly VB programming. At this point, the company fired their router guy, so I jumped right in and filled the gap. I soon obtained my CCNA and soon after ask for, and recieved, a salary of $32,000, before my 17th birthday.

    I then obtained my MCP because we were a Windows shop. I was still at this point 50/50 programmer/tech. I couldn't decide what my pasion was for. IT company started going downhill, a few days before my 19th bday I baled and got a job at a financial institution - titled 'network technician' on a team of about 4 techs, however I am the network administrator by any definition, I have the responsibility (but not the title) of the security administrator, as well as Exchange administrator (to my agony). I just obtained my MCSA as part of my job objectives for the last 6 month period. At this point I am making $42,000.

    I took 12 credit hours at a community college back when I was 16, and am realizing now that especially in the field of network security a degree is important not just for the piece of paper to show the suits, but anyone really does benefit from the well-rounded education you get along the way. I intend to continue attending university part time for as long as it takes. I love my job, my hobby. I am now purchasing a house, enjoying being married, and looking forward to every day I get to go to work, and excited that I have the oppourtunity continue my college education...
  • by jascat ( 602034 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:51PM (#5247491)
    Me...being a former shit-hot teenage geek...disagree with this move by Redhat. This looks like a ploy to increase its market share by targetting youth who will have very little real world experience if any at all. This will only devalue their certification in the end making it nothing more than another MCSE.

    Unix takes time and experience to learn it effectively. I was in high school not too long ago (almost 4 years) and I know they won't teach Unix. The cirriculum will consist of exactly what is needed to know to pass the test.

    I have met folks who have CCNA's from High School Tech-prep programs...and I wouldn't trust them with two WinXP systems, a hub and two network cables. To stump them, I would ask them what "sh ru" did or what the difference was between a Router and a Layer 3 Switch.

  • I wouldn't take it (Score:1, Insightful)

    by jmitch ( 593533 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:56PM (#5247523)
    I am only in the 10th grade and I know I wouldnt take this class even if it was offered to me. I knox enough to test out of the certification (well maybe not fn rh). But, I know I would not take it, its just a waste of my time. I'll get paid about 4 times as much straight outa college majoring in eecs (electrical engineering and computer science). If you really wanna learn computers dont go for some pos 'commercial' linux system. Go out and learn how to make your own system. Maybe you can have a certification course some day :P
  • Script Kiddy H.S. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by t0ny ( 590331 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @10:59PM (#5247542)
    I look forward to this trend. Soon, many more linux servers will be getting 0wnZed.

    Seriously, however, nobody is going to pay an 18 year old $30k/yr. It wasnt until recently that I have been able to make good money, because most corporate people dont promote or pay well "youngsters" (unless they are bullshitters with an MBA). Lucky for me the men in my family get grey hair early.

  • Re:Shop/Trades (Score:4, Insightful)

    by stratjakt ( 596332 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @11:17PM (#5247652) Journal
    >> I ask agian, why do you think people who have no college should be banished to the domain of "carpenters/plumbers/welders/machinists"?

    Banished to the domain? Hardly.. Have you any idea what a master plumber or carpenter makes? You're a fool for looking down your nose at people who work with their hands for a living.

    You can get a job in IT with HS education. But chances are that 30k job will pay 30k for the rest of your life.

    If you want a future out of high school, you're better off as a tradesman.

    Besides, people will always need carpenters, contractors, plumbers and electricians. The wont always need a RHCE
  • Re:Too young? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by zachlipton ( 448206 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @11:20PM (#5247667)
    [posted without +1 bonus to avoid karma whoring]

    I really resent your comments. Certainly I do not know what every part of my system is doing 100% of the time, nor should I have to know. The idea is to know about one area, or one set of areas and have a good understanding of that component. I know enough about how my system works to use it in the ways I want to and if I don't I go lean more about it so I can make it happen. However, are script kiddies module owners for open-source software projects? Do script kiddies spend the weekend building tools to assist with the development of perl6 (not a language war flame)? I think not.

    You seem to be making baseless accusiations with absolutely no proof. Personally, I find technical theater to be facinating and do not see how that reflects on my social skills or my ability to use technology.

    Please try not to post flames just for the sake of attacking random innocent people. Get to know someone, then determine what skills they may or may not have.
  • Re:hehehe (Score:2, Insightful)

    by MoTec ( 23112 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @11:21PM (#5247668)
    The highschool students would have to stand in line with the other college degree professionals with many years of experience to get any IT job. Even help desk.

    That's not quite true for one reason.

    Money.

    Kids right out of highschool are willing to work for less than an employer would have to pay someone with a degree or someone with years of experience, or both. Different markets are different and some hungry professional might take a job for $23k a year but a 18 year old is a lot more likely to take that job, expecially when it's offered at $11 an hour or so... Tons more than flipping burgers.
  • A piece of paper? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Daanji ( 631740 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @11:22PM (#5247672)
    Yes, a degree is a piece of paper. A piece of paper that represents experience, technical fortitude, and problem solving. ( it depends of where you get the education ) I'm grossly tired of many slashdotters denotting ALL degrees/certifications as useless. That is not true in ALL cases. There are some programs or educational facilities that just want your money. However, most colleges or cerification programs that I have seen are worth taking. In certain situations it is not possible to teach your self how everything works because your can't afford the equipment, books, or understand the material. Colleges, for a modest fee (tuition) will let you play with VERY expensive equipment. Thus you gain experience. I agree experience it better than book knowledge. College is about both. The two interplay nicely to create a rounded employee, not some drone. Certifications are ok, degrees are good, and experience is best, but I believe all three are necessary. You can't rely on just one. Honestly, I have never seen any corporation that expects their employees to know everything and have experience in everything. Most of the corporate life is on the job training. In the end, the most imporant lesson is learn how to learn. Experience won't help in every situation, nor will a cert or a degree. But knowing how to learning will always be there to solve any problem.
  • $30k??? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sean23007 ( 143364 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @11:23PM (#5247677) Homepage Journal
    God, I hope they don't advertise the $30000 salary right out of high school too much. Kids should want to take this class to learn the stuff, not to make $30k the next year. Because it just isn't that much, and there isn't that much potential for a higher salary for someone who takes a job straight out of high school.

    This sounds like a good way for a lot of promising young kids to get absolutely screwed (and not in the good way that most of them wouldn't mind).
  • Re:Presumptions (Score:3, Insightful)

    by MeanMF ( 631837 ) on Thursday February 06, 2003 @11:23PM (#5247678) Homepage
    Yeah, wait now -- who's hiring again?

    A lot of people, if you're an experienced systems administrator who's willing to work for $30,000 a year...
  • by La Temperanza ( 638530 ) <temperanza&softhome,net> on Friday February 07, 2003 @12:50AM (#5248133)
    First off, does Red Hat have any concrete advantages over other *NIXen for systems administration? Don't sell your personal favorite, just state the facts, please. :)

    Second, does the Red Hat certification training provide reasonably bias-free instruction in regards to different *NIXen?

    The second is far more relevant then the first, but I'm curious about both.
  • by NTworks ( 163511 ) on Friday February 07, 2003 @03:03AM (#5248625)
    I had this same thing.. Cisco has been setting up similar things to give CCNA's to high school students across the country.

    The teachers are telling the kids how they can make $40k right out of high school. I got my CCNA thru their school program as a senior

    let me tell you, it is total BULLSHIT. 90% of the people who actually passed the cert (which was only ~50% of the class, me included) will never touch a router at least not for another 5 years. and they WONT find a $40k job out of high school working on cisco equipment, especially with the current IT economy

    I was lucky and landed a job out of high school in 2000 when the economy was still decent, I work as a mainframe computer and high-end 64-bit unix machine operator in a large computer datacenter (also the webmaster for our datacenter). I was the last person they hired without a degree, now they wont even consider u unless you have a degree AND working IT experience. CCNA's are now worthless thanks to cisco flooding the market with no-knowledge high school punks who think they are the shit because they vaguely know what "config t" is
  • by AKnightCowboy ( 608632 ) on Friday February 07, 2003 @09:46AM (#5249616)
    You're faulting George W. Bush for a normal cyclic correction in the economy? Look, when 18 year olds are getting hired out of high school with a GED making $45k/year because they have a little Linux and Perl skills, don't you think something is wrong? Go to college and try taking some economics courses if you don't understand what I'm getting at. The stock market was hugely inflated and nobody in their right mind believed it would last forever. The bigger the high the bigger the crash afterwards. They didn't call them the roaring 20's for nothing. We can only be glad they've instituted laws to help keep things like the Great Depression from happening again (as best as is possible) and that we only have a 6-10% unemployment rate. I don't see people on the street with signs saying "will code for food". Then again, I don't live in San Jose.

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...