Group Outlines Specs For Linux-based Set-top boxes 92
Shadowhawk writes "According to
Silicon Strategies, a group called "TV Linux Alliance" is creating a spec for digital set-top boxes using Linux. The specifications, dubbed version 0.8, defines the functions for RF tuners and other components in Linux-based set-top boxes. It also outlines the application programming interfaces (APIs) for those devices, according to officials from the alliance."
I guess the question is... (Score:3, Insightful)
Personally i think if its done right its a good thing.
wow, real informative (Score:5, Insightful)
It'd be nice to actually see what standards were set, or at least have a link to them.
It's like CNN having a news update about a presidental speech and saying "well the president outlined his goals for the economy and foreign policy, he is supported by these congressmen"
Then failing to say what the policy is.
Talk about a fluff piece.
Much ado about nothing. (Score:3, Insightful)
Lame. (Score:3, Insightful)
To even see the specs you have to print out a license agreement, sign it, fax it to them, and more... So much for an open standard.
$2000....Shove it up their.... (Score:3, Insightful)
$2000 for a set of standards that no one knows what they are at the moment?
No OS costs = Greater profits! (Score:3, Insightful)
I wonder how many other industries could follow this trend? Note that MS has its hand into other pies like HAVI (Home Audio Video Interoperability), Media center, recent announcements with Panasonic for CDs etc...
If it's big business, it's bad news (Score:5, Insightful)
Force Palladium-like stuff on them (or)
Force viewing stats (or)
Force no ad-skipping (or)
or whatever.
Hackers, on the other hand, start a sourceforge project, another sees what's available, enhances it for their needs, puts it back in the pot, and so on. That will never be controlled in the way this alliance can be.
I expect that some of the alliance "components" will end up having some restrictions in them, so even they will not be available for open-source hackers.
The only way will be to write your own, from the ground up (at best keep a "standard" interface). Sorry.
To counter WinXP Media Center (Score:3, Insightful)
Is there a competing standard available or being worked on, that's FREE to read?
Jesus, Standards were meant to be free.
Modders (Score:2, Insightful)
Confidentiality in license vs. GPL (Score:5, Insightful)
Now, I guess it's fine to put these restrictions on a specification of a GPL-d system, but once they start releasing products, they'll have to release source code - so i'm a bit confused as to what the license implies. They're protecting the standard, but are going to release the source of implementations? Why?
Re:If it's big business, it's bad news (Score:4, Insightful)
Make it kazaa easy! Have different flavours, and plug ins, and skins, and all the other crap we love, but first make it EASY to install.
If it needs a big MF of a chip now instead of a dedicated hardware encode/ decoder who cares - we'll have 200GHx PVII systems in Walmart for $300 soon enough! THEN who needs a hardware encoder.
This stuff doesn't have to be complicated - just enable people to do simple things VERY easily. After that all works start adding the nice to haves.