New Red Hat Multimedia Oriented Distribution 209
ezadro writes "I just spotted this article at LinuxToday about Redhat being directly involved in a new distribution that will be known as ReHMuDi, which stands for Red Hat Multimedia Distribution." The goal seems to be
a system for professional audio composers and engineers. Don't expect it
for awhile- they have 24 months scheduled to do it, although it looks like
releases will start by the end of 02.
fp (Score:1, Insightful)
demudi? (Score:2, Insightful)
Remedy (Score:2, Insightful)
Man, that's a bad acronym.
Re:why must Linux be all things to all people? (Score:4, Insightful)
True. However, we've recently seen it *is* possible to use *nix for pro audio, provided you tailor your *nix of choice specifically for the purpose. Apple did endless tweaking to theirs and right now, if you use apps that were specifically written for it, such as Ableton Live, OSX is quite a stellar performer.
Whether any software company is actually going to take the trouble to write for Linux is a different matter entirely, but I'd sure like to have PD run on something that performs a little better than vanilla Linux.
Re:Step 1: Collect Underpants (Score:5, Insightful)
I buy boxed sets about twice a year, from different linux companies -- SuSE, Red Hat or Mandrake. can I burn the ISOs? Yep, but I like to give back to the community and since I can't code, I buy their products to show my support.
Thats why redhat needs to make the software fool! (Score:3, Insightful)
We know the software is not there, if Redhat makes the software, it can work.
We need a fruityloop or reason like tool, We need a protools like tool, a cakewalk like tool, and a file sharing tool so we can create music and then upload it onto a network or even an extention of redhats site, and redhat can do something like Mp3.com to make profits.
Red Hat trademark (Score:5, Insightful)
Considering that their trademark is just about the only thing they own (they give away everything else under the GPL) I'd say they have the right and duty to defend it. You can distribute copies of their distribution - just don't call it Red Hat.
On a more philosophical note - I wouldn't mind living in a world without copyright or patent laws. Neither of them protects my rights to be free from violence or fraud. On the contrary - patents and copyrights are a deal with the government to use the force of the courts underwritten by police violence to go after people who are doing something that doesn't harm anyone.
But trademark is different - it serves an important role in protecting me from fraud. How can trust in a vendor be built without a means of identifying his products that has some protection from fraud? It doesn't seem practical to put this burden on me as a customer. This tradeoff between two freedoms is therefore justified.
Re:why must Linux be all things to all people? (Score:3, Insightful)
Base meaning of this distribution is putting together all of that in one package that fits all. As I presume, there will be some new ongoing projects to go with that (also suggestions and co-work with musical departments institutes that are contributing to project). But still major thing it will be tweaking everything together to make a sencible one-way distribution (as Lycoris) and show coverage of that department. I don't know, but I presume that this project will include some framework application on desktop to connect all applications as user expects (my guess) and to ease productivity.
Main problem of linux audio was, there was no applications, at least until I've searched whole Internet to get a software for real time multichannel recording and software for editing wave files.
Getting distribution in that way, well it's just another LSB-audio to show others what it can be done in this department, and making place for some commercial applications that will probably follow this move. (I think that movie industry would be glad to cover that deparment also as they did CGI).
BeOS was created for this... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:why must Linux be all things to all people? (Score:3, Insightful)
That didn't come out quite right. I meant to add that obviously not all of these are mature, usable programs; however it is constantly becoming easier to find free software to fulfill your sound/MIDI needs.
This will fill a huge void. (Score:4, Insightful)
Most of them used Redhat, which doesn't come installed with ALSA plugins. Redhat needs to include support for OSS sound drivers and ALSA plugins out of the box if they want this to fly.
I don't think there's a lack of quality audio software out there, heck linux even has a mp3 scratching system that could give finalscratch a run for its money.
So yeah, basically if redhat ships this distro with all the "cool drivers" installed, a nice gui, and loads of tools, this thing should do well.
Re:Why? (Score:2, Insightful)
I disagree. They were predisposed to working with the Atari ST and Amiga (check out some of the fine music around the net composed with these two machines) when those systems were popular. This will be no more difficult, and given the advances in GUI technology since then, probably even easier.
Re:Overlap. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Red Hat trademark (Score:2, Insightful)
Simple - Red Hat owns the trademark on "Red Hat Linux", and can tell me to stop, on pain of being sued.
They can only do that if they prevent people from using their trademark - you know that a company must defend their trademark, or risk losing it.