Personal Finance Software for Unix? 322
pstreck asks: "I'm trying to find the best personal finance software for Unix. I've been using Quicken for a while, but unfortuantlly it won't run under Wine. I've tried gnucash but it just isn't up to par with what Quicken offers. What do you guys use?" While the free software versions may not quite be up to par with the current commercial offerings, it won't always be the case. The turning point can start now, of course. What finance software are you using now, what features do you like and what features do you think these software packages need?
online banking (Score:1, Interesting)
Check out MoneyDance (Score:5, Interesting)
generally... (Score:2, Interesting)
now not only do they not know how to use a pencil and paper, they cant even use a CALCULATOR! they need special software to do EVERYTHING for them
QED
It would really help... (Score:2, Interesting)
If there are specific features you're looking for, you should have mentioned them. Right now this is just another in a series of useless "Ask Slashdot" questions that indicate the poster didn't do any footwork on their own or even think very hard about the question.
I use moneyplex for quite a while now. (Score:1, Interesting)
I don't do big things with it.
Just online banking, but I think it is quite nice.
But it costs a bit of money and is not open source...
Re:I want (Score:2, Interesting)
I'd feel better if I were running a bootleg copy. But I stupidly paid retail for it.
Re:*Grumble* (Score:1, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
MS Money (Score:1, Interesting)
When I first tried GnuCash, I found it was able to do the majority of the things I do in Money, though not necessarially quite as user-friendly. Two major things that I found I was unable to do in GnuCash, however, were internet updates for my various investments (Mutual Funds, 401K, etc). I also tend to use a lot of the reports and graphing features in Money. GnuCash's capabilities in this respect were limited.
One thing that Money doesn't do, though, which I find to be a pain and would like GnuCash to be able to do is updating the prices (value) of US Savings Bonds using interest rate info from the 'Net.
And, just because I'm just in a flame-fishing mood today, I have to say that I tend to be very resistant to moving to a new program in general. Moving to a new program and losing any functionality (that I use at all) is not going to happen. Moving to a new program whose asthetics are (IMHO) much less pleasing and whose functionality is less is definitely not going to happen. UNLESS, that is, the new program has some additional functionality which weighs in more heavily, of course.
Just my $0.02...
my 'must have' feature (Score:4, Interesting)
Now, I'm not too bad writing bits of code and what-not (it's a tangential part of my day job), and I appreciate that, to some extent, linux money applications can be scripted and stuff; maybe I could roll my own forecaster this way, but I really don't want to feel like I need to kludge together such a relatively 'big' feature when I don't have the time and interest after getting home. (Maybe it's just me, and, yes, I'm a bit lazy once I'm off the clock.
I probably haven't looked into all possible alternatives for a linux-based financial program, but so far I haven't noticed one that really handles this.
Re:I want (Score:2, Interesting)
But it sounds to me like you are looking for a convenience. If the only reason you aren't using GnuCash is because you can't directly link to all those sources (401k, bank, CC), then it would seem that you are just a little lazy. Can't you just manually enter it? Yeah, I know, computers make things easier, and once you get used to them (lazy) then it is harder to do things for yourself. But I suppose that is why Windows is so popular.
up to par (Score:2, Interesting)
Yes it will. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but writing software like that is BORING. Take a look at the best open source software out there and you'll see that it is "interesting" software: operating systems, window managers, development tools. Financial software is the kind of boring crud that nobody writes for fun, and so something like GNU cash will progress until the easy features are done, and then the authors will realize they don't want to spend any more time on such an uninteresting piece of software, and they will move on to something more interesting. Some software is just so utterly uninteresting or unprestigious that nobody works on it for fun, you have to PAY them to work on it.
Re:*Grumble* (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:One hitch (Score:2, Interesting)
And that is why free software is failing on the desktop; if each package uses different terms for the same functionality is it any wonder that users are put off.
Bitch about Microsoft, logo-requirements and usability guidelines all you like, but if software written to those standards is usable by people without much computer knowledge then it is going to be used.
Again, there are copywrite/trademark issues (Score:2, Interesting)
I work for an online brokerage firm, and a new feature slated to me rolled out is a "trading wizard". That's a generic enough term, you'd guess. Guess again.
We had to figure out a different name for it as the term has been trademarked/copywritten by another firm.
I don't know if this is the case here, but in addition to product differentiation, it's a good strategy to call a feature something other than the generic term that might first come to mind -- an open source project really can't afford lawsuits.
Online banking (Score:1, Interesting)
Most banks have this now, and it's usually free.
Just use your debit card or direct withdrawl instead of checks (checks can take days to clear...this is bad if you want an up-to-date statement), and you should have no problems.
:wq
GnuCash Doesn't Cut It (Score:1, Interesting)