Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
SuSE Businesses

SuSE 8.0 Now Shipping 298

MobyTurbo writes "Well, it's technically a day late, but SuSE Linux 8.0 is now shipping. The increase from 7.3 to 8.0 is due to the inclusion of KDE 3.0, a SuSE-modified kernel version 2.4.18 (with Andre's VM), an improved firewall, among other packages that have been upgraded or added. (Including a couple of new games. :-) )"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

SuSE 8.0 Now Shipping

Comments Filter:
  • Eeezzzzy (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Lappie ( 214857 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @09:40AM (#3394132)
    I'm still very impressed with the automaticity of the installation of my 7.3. Almost everything worked out of the box, without one glitch. I'm certain I'll be the first to buy me the 8.0 box when it's in de shops here in Europe.
  • x86 only? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by gecko19scl ( 465953 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @09:54AM (#3394218)
    I run SuSE 7.3 SPARC at the moment and its really good...is the new 8.0 release for i386 only? or do they have a sparc port on the way? i hope they dont kill it off like Red Hat did, they have done a really good job with 7.3 :-)

    chris

    .sig : bad command or file name
  • by joestar ( 225875 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:03AM (#3394252) Homepage
    They announced it yesterday - it includes StarOffice 6.0 for ProSuite & PowerPack Editions. The announce is here [mandrakesoft.com].

    Does SuSE 8.0 include StarOffice 6.0 as well?
  • Version numbers (Score:2, Interesting)

    by prefect42 ( 141309 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:05AM (#3394262)
    It's amazing how fast the numbers go up in distributions compared to that of the packages within...

    Maybe companies should be forced to number their distros based on the average version number of the packages within; that'd cause an interesting non-linear numbering scheme. ;)

    jh
  • Lycoris... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by bleckywelcky ( 518520 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:05AM (#3394264)

    Any affiliation with MS? Just wondering, cause I saw this at the bottom:

    Lycoris and Desktop/LX are Trademarks of Redmond Linux Corp. © 2001, 2002 Lycoris All Rights Reserved
  • Re:Reviews... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by d3xt3r ( 527989 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:10AM (#3394297)
    I have been running SuSE since 7.0 and have purchased 7.1-7.3 and each release has brought more features and better integration to an already great distro. I don't have 8.0 yet, but when it arrives, I can almost guarantee that I'll be happy with it. =)

    Like Red Hat, SuSE releases their own patched version of the Linux kernel which have always been extremely fast and reliable (in my experience) and their installation is easy. The other nice thing is the setup tool, Yast2, it's the best integrated setup/control center tool I've seen yet.

    The nice thing about SuSE is that everything just works. SuSE offers upgrades to KDE and GNOME that can be downloaded and installed automatically with Yast Online Update on the same day that KDE and GNOME annouce their new releases. They are definitely on top of things. Also, Yast can be used to configure just about every aspect of the system, no need whatsoever to edit config files.

    Another nice thing about SuSE is that it's Oracle certified. SuSE offers a nice rpm that sets the system up for installing and running Oracle, making installation as simple as on Windows (at least for 9i).

    I've tried Red Hat, Mandrake, SuSE and debian and I am happiest by far with SuSE. It has easier config tools than Mandrake, the speed and reliability of Red Hat, and the advantage that it is commercially supported by many companies, meaning that if a product claims it will run on linux, it WILL run on SuSE Linux. :-)

  • RedHat to Suse (Score:3, Interesting)

    by joe_fish ( 6037 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:12AM (#3394311) Homepage Journal
    I'm using RedHat 7.2 right now, but it isn't very stable - Galeon occasionally locks everything up solid. So I need a way out.

    I was hoping to wait for RH7.3, but perhaps this is a better option.

    My real question is how hard will I have to work to move accross all my configs? There's samba/printers/sendmail/etc/etc. Anyone know of a good way of doing RH->Suse without any pain?

  • SuSE is very easy to setup for newbies and gurus alike (no time to waste on configuring stuff, leaving time for tinkering on the non-obvious things) and gives you all the power of linux in a nice package.

    Amen - I want to develop the software I get paid for or I want to play with, and I want to have my servers working rock solid without devoting myself 24/7 to them. SuSE offers a very solid base, incredibly logically laid out system, very stable releases (I'm even trusting the x,0 release here), and not only fast security updates, but software version updates for quite a bit of software, even for releases several minor version old.

    It allows me to get my work done, and provides a nice CLI, GUI and "install and ignore" server experience. Plus, if you're doing enterprise work, check out their more powerful packages (the ones that start at $1000 and move on up). They provide the packages for IBM's enterprise applications, not to mention the Linux for IBM's big iron. Simply having a team that can provide the necessary QA and support to big customers makes me feel confidant as a minor customer of theirs.

    --
    Evan

  • by oever ( 233119 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:22AM (#3394382) Homepage
    No, still StarOffice 5.2.
    Source: The SuSE 8.0 Professional box on my desk.

  • by NuMessiah ( 7486 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:26AM (#3394423) Journal
    SuSe 8.0 comes with StarrOffice 5.2 :(.

    Too bad that they were unable to strike a deal like Mandrake did with Sun. SO 6.0 would be a very good addition to KDE 3.0 and stuff.

    Odd thing is that SuSe usually has a very good connections to other companies (read: SuSe Linux Database Server = IBM DB2 UDB + distro, SuSe Groupware Server = Lotus Domino + distro, SuSe Certified Oracle 9i ...).

    bb4now,
    PMC
  • by fm6 ( 162816 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:41AM (#3394546) Homepage Journal
    When I tried SuSE a couple of years ago, the thing that seemed to set it apart was its ambitious attempt to rework system configuration. Instead of hacking the usual array of scripts and config files, the SuSE admin was supposed to set a large set of parameters contained in a single file.

    Thing is, I could never get these parameters set exactly right. It was always tempting to bypass this procedure and configure the system the old-fashioned way.

    So here's my question: does SuSE still do things this way? And if so, do people really use these parameters, or do they just blow it off and edit the scripts?

  • Re:Lycoris... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MsGeek ( 162936 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @10:52AM (#3394626) Homepage Journal
    Lycoris is also designed to look and feel more like Windows XP than any other distro. The real purpose of Lycoris seems to be to provide a distro with "training wheels" for Microsoft refugees. As such, it occupies a very unique and very needed niche in Linux-land.

    I have an order in for Lycoris Desktop Developer edition, (Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!) and I will probably comment on my experiences with the distro in my column at Low End PC as soon as I get some time with it.

    I think it's hilarious that these guys are based in Redmond. I don't think that MS is quaking in their boots just yet, but if this is what the Lycoris site claims, they might have reason to in the future.

    Oh yeah, just so I correct a mistake I made about this distro in the past...it is based on Caldera, not Corel/Debian.
  • Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2, Interesting)

    by chess ( 40930 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @11:01AM (#3394692)
    The most interesting thing is that they broke up /etc/rc.config. AFAIR the comment in the file it should resemble the Red Hat way now...

    chess
  • Re:SuSE is not free (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @12:31PM (#3395368)
    IMNSHO, two questions should be answered before responding to the parent post: first, must all software in a Linux distro be free or open-source, and second, is free and/or open-source software morally superior to non-free and/or closed-source software? I would answer "not necessarily" to both.

    Legally speaking, as long as no licenses are violated, SuSE can do whatever it wants. Technically speaking, I do think that SuSE should at least make YaST's source code available; after all, there may be some excellent ideas there that we can all profit from. Nonetheless, I don't think we should count it as a strike against them that YaST is closed-source.

    I agree with "use the best tool for the job, preferring open-source and/or free software when possible," so if SuSE happens to be the best tool, I will use it. If not, I won't.

  • by Mustang Matt ( 133426 ) on Tuesday April 23, 2002 @12:32PM (#3395373)
    I use it on all my servers, you're probably right, Debian is the better tweakable linux.

    SuSE is really good for those of us that are starting because it comes with a NICELY documented book(s) explaining a lot of the basics and the medium difficulty stuff.

    They also usually have a tech in their IRC room who will answer questions for you.

    In the end I really like SuSE. It's done everything I've required and more. I usually use it as a server without a graphical front end, but even on my two workstations with the graphics, it installed nicely and didn't require me to know more than I need to know to use the systems. And one of them was a laptop.

    Two thumbs up!

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...