Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Linux Software

Non-Deathmatch: Preempt v. Low-Latency Patch 178 178

LiquidPC writes: "In this whitepaper on Linux Scheduler Latency, Clark Williams of Red Hat compares the performance of two popular ways to improve kernel Linux preemption latency -- the preemption patch pioneered by MontaVista and the low-latency patch pioneered by Ingo Molnar -- and discovers that the best approach might be a combination of both."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Non-Deathmatch: Preempt v. Low-Latency Patch

Comments Filter:

1000 pains = 1 Megahertz

Working...