Ask New 2.4 Maintainer Marcelo Tosatti Anything 308
Linus keeps hinting (declaring, even) that he's nearly ready to work full-time on the 2.5 development branch of his kernel, and hand the 2.4 kernel off to Marcelo Tosatti. Marcelo's graciously agreeed to answer questions (you might want to read some of his mailing list contributions first), so here's your chance to ask him what he'll do in the famous footsteps of Linus and Alan Cox, and how he got there. Please only put one question per post; we'll pass along the top-rated comments to Marcelo for his answers, and hear back from him shortly.
My Question (Score:4, Interesting)
background (Score:5, Interesting)
2.4 and 2.5 (Score:5, Interesting)
Money (Score:4, Interesting)
Hit by a bus (Score:5, Interesting)
I'd hate to stray from the status quo where standard interview questions are concerned, so in keeping with it, I ask:
What's it like knowing that, if (God forbid) Linus and Alan were hit by a bus, you might be "The Man"?
Hey, someone had to ask.
Hardware to support in 2.4? (Score:4, Interesting)
Expectations (Score:5, Interesting)
Age a question (Score:5, Interesting)
Preemptile (Score:4, Interesting)
security patches in the Changelogs? (Score:4, Interesting)
Threads (Score:5, Interesting)
Any chance of Alan Cox's multi-threaded post-mortem debugging patch which dumps multiple core files for each lightweight process (LWP) making it into the kernel? How about support for post mortem debugging of multithreaded core files in general (right now there is zero support).
Any rants about threading as a general topic would work.
Time for renumbering? (Score:1, Interesting)
Wouldn't it make more sense to take 2.4.14 (or 2.4.15 whenever it comes out) and call that 2.5.0, while moving the unstable kernels over to 2.6? While it would break the even/odd numbering paradigm, that seems a better option than having a subversion which starts out unstable and partway through morphs into a stable form.
Stability vs Features (Score:5, Interesting)
For example, do new or updated device drivers rank more highly than VM updates?
-- Azaroth
How do you plan to handle the big companies? (Score:5, Interesting)
How are you going to deal with the submissions from people like IBM and SGI who are going to want to make significant changes to 2.4?
Do you use a distribution? (Score:4, Interesting)
Alan Cox and politics (Score:5, Interesting)
But is the Linux kernel the right forum for politics? Do you feel that it's a bad idea to involve the kernel in politics -- a slippery slope in which the software itself becomes a political pawn? Or would you say that the kernel -- and all software -- has already become a political pawn, and Cox's actions are entirely justified given that free software's existence is under increasing threat?
Human interest (Score:4, Interesting)
The Deal with Marcelo, Alan and Linus? (Score:4, Interesting)
What is going on here?
It seems that Alan has stopped doing his -AC series...
Linus is finishing up 2.4.X after making some deep changes to the VM (Adrea's new VM), and thankfully adding EXT3, but form what I have been reading, 2.4.15 is the end of the stable kernel series (with no XFS or JFS support which is upsetting).
Andrea has a plethora of experimental/tweaked patches in ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea. What is interesting/worrisome to me is that Marcelo's directory there is empty.
Marcelo must be a great guy, I've seen a lot of banter on newsgroups with him, and a few chages in the stable changelog here and there, but to me it looks like a lot of talk. Alan used to release (past tense, it seems it has stopped) AC patches on a near daily basis, to me, Marcelo is vapor.
Is the maintainer's jobs simple to make small changes to the kernel when errata is found? Or is it, as Alan has done, to integrate and merge a LOT of stuff to produce a useful and robust hybrid kernel and then suggest that maybe the unbroken things should be merged in.
I wish Marcelo luck in this endeavor, but also wish to see loads of "maintainence," Linux really, really needs feverish active development, and there a lot of people, Like Alan and Linus, who put out quite a bit. I am hoping Marcelo will set a new precedent for uber-feverish maintenance - maybe even see XFS and JFS and other things that the distributions have to waste huge amounts of time tinkering and adding various enterprise-ish things to make the Linux kernel stand up for, as they put it, prime time.
Money (Score:4, Interesting)
Kernel releases (Score:1, Interesting)
CML2, cvs, kdb, crypto and more (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, would you consider moving crypto into the main tree in the near future? Debian has, Redhat will "soon"..
Would you consider using bitkeeper, cvs, or even complete changelogs with proper attribution of WHICH merges took place?
And finally, would you consider FINALLY bringing kdb into the main kernel? Linus doesnt want it, but he doesnt want it because he doesnt see the value. He didnt say he banned it..
Patches (Score:5, Interesting)
Why you? (Score:5, Interesting)
What makes you think that you can handle maintaining the Linux Kernel? What qualifications do you have and why should we (the people) trust you with the Linux kernel.
I realize that this is actually two questions, but they more or less go together in one answer.
Interaction with distros (Score:3, Interesting)
A pretty generic question (Score:5, Interesting)
Any plans to improve documenting the kernel? (Score:5, Interesting)
doesn't this somehow defeat the point of the source being available in the first place? Basically the question I have to ask is this, "I have flirted with the thought of sending comment only patches to the kernel to further help people understand certain subtleties (e.g. why the pprev and next pointers in user_struct are not what they seem) in the source code especially CS students who are learning about the kernel in operating systems classes. If someone were to start such a program would such patches be accepted into the kernel?
Are you ready....... (Score:2, Interesting)
code control (Score:5, Interesting)
National biases. (Score:3, Interesting)
--saint
A question (Score:2, Interesting)
No, the -real- question is whether you will be treating 2.4.x as a "maintained but dead" branch, or whether you'll be actively beating the code senseless with a (plank *) twoByFour?
(Quick followup: If you -are- going to actively develop 2.4.x, will you be restricting that to merging in 2.5.x code, or will you be seeking out new patches, boldly coding where no kernel has gone before?)
Conectiva & Kernel & Security (Score:3, Interesting)
Kernel growth -- is it a problem? (Score:5, Interesting)
My question: I presume kernel bloat, both in terms of code size and resource demands, can impact heavily on maintainability. Do you see this as a significant issue for the future, how much of a problem is it, and is it something that can be easily addressed without tearing apart the code base and reorganizing it from the ground up?
/Brian
diary (Score:5, Interesting)
Because we all like to know, if you'll actually be doing what your gonna promise now
How often (Score:2, Interesting)
Age (Score:3, Interesting)
Do you think this will reflect badly on the image of linux? (as seen from IT decision makers)
Google/VM/Corporate influences (Score:2, Interesting)
It seems obvious from this post that Google can't use 2.4 until this gets worked out, and Google is one of Linux's big success stories...
How does that weigh in on the todo scale versus my problem with the Visor driver? What if it was Connectiva that had the problem? (Or Redhat?)
(and a quick second question: How can any human read teh 7000 posts a month to the mailing list and still get any coding done?)
Re:Do you use a distribution? (Score:5, Interesting)
What operating systems and platforms do you personally use and which ones do you also use (and why)?
Do you run a common environment on all your machines (in as far as possible) or do you run different things in different places and which environments do you prefer for what?
What development tools do you use (especially for the kernel), would you do anything differebtly for the kernel (like make it compile with other compilers) if you could (or will you) and would you like to (or will you) place the Linux stable kernel into CVS or another version control system?
Do you feel any personal preferences for anything might actually be in anyway reflected in your work as the stable kernel maintainer?
Do you have a good lawyer? Are you planing on travelling to the U.S.A. (for all I know you live there, excuse my ignorance:-)? Have you experience dealing with politicians, business leaders and large groups and do you see this as a part of your job description?
When you stop maintaing the stable kernel, what would you like people to be saying about your reign?
Linux or BSD
Boot Messsages (Score:3, Interesting)
Do you plan on furthering this cause, and helping make our boot times a simpler, less complicated read?
Features vs Stability (Score:3, Interesting)
Conectiva issues (Score:4, Interesting)
I read that you live in the same house as Rik van Riel, who wrote the first Linux 2.4 VM and who also works for Conectiva. Rik wrote in his not-that-very-often updated diary that he travelled a lot in Brazil, to help customers anywhere. That takes a lot of time. Is your job going to be different once Alan Cox passes the maintainership?
orphaned branch (Score:1, Interesting)
Any chance that sun-32 will be maintained again?
Since 2.3.5 all we hear is: be patient....
All sun support is currently for 64-bit users
Kernel code does not even compile anymore!
Re:Any plans to improve documenting the kernel? (Score:3, Interesting)
When you write code you write for a specific standard (or compiler or interpreter) but when you write English you write for unknown. Descriptions could at some point get more lengthy than code. Would that be bad? I don't know. I'd rather have the information than not, personally. But I can see why bibles of information are kept out of the kernel.
stuff&life.... (Score:2, Interesting)
I have grown to respect quite a bit you as well as some of the other folks who work in kernel development at conectiva in Brazil (Rik, Arnaldo..).
I have been wanting to try to read more and more about the linux kernel, and maybe(?) try to get involved, so i must ask how did you start out? Any pointers that i should follow to get to understand more deeply the kernel? I mean you are not in heavy kernel hacking and you are a few years younger than me... (My guess is that it wasnt in college, since by now you should be doing the infamous college entrance exams... aka vestibular =P)
Also it seems that you value your privacy, since there isnt much public information about you out there... Would you elaborate a little on how you got where you are? =)
Just one more thing... I feel i must say that all Brazilians and young people in general are very proud and happy to see where you are now! Thanks a lot and keep up the good work!Re:Money (Score:3, Interesting)
question for Marcello (Score:2, Interesting)
"I've been examining the existing kernel configuration system, and I have about concluded that the best favor we could do everybody involved with it is to take it out behind the barn and shoot it through the head."
For someone as persuasive and influential as Raymond to make such a statement, it begs for a response, if not a rebuttal.