Queen of England Gets Red Hat 150
Zerbey writes "According to Linux Today The Royal Family's web site is now running Red Hat as apposed to Solaris. See for yourself on Netcraft. Congratulations, Ma'am :) "
Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker
Re:The Queen? -> Her power. (Score:2)
All this ignores the real power of a Monarch, though. They have a sort of centrifugal effect on a country- they draw a sort of uber-loyalty that transcends mere politics. It's very valuable to have such a symbol of continuity and immutability, particularly in tough times. Ideally, they'd serve as a role model for the nation, though some royal families (the Windsors!!) have done an awful job of fulfilling this responsibility.
Maybe choosing Linux for Her Majesty's Web Servers is a good first step on the road to Windsor redemption.
Re:Is this an argument for BSD ? (Score:1)
char *stupidsig = "this is my dumb sig";
Re:I can see it now: (Score:1)
Could we soon be kneeling and saying, "Sir Linus"?
The rules would not permit either a "Sir Linus" or
"Linus KBE".
Though a "Sir Alan Cox" would be possible...
its probably NT in disguise (Score:1)
All the static pages have the suffix
its probably NT in disguise (Score:1)
All the static pages have the suffix
Re:Those Royals (Score:1)
Re:"Ma'am"? (Score:1)
Re:Those Royals (Score:1)
Not strictly true, for two reasons. Firstly, there's not much of an empire left (c.f. Hong Kong, handed back to China not so long ago), and Australia isn't part of the `empire' (on which, of course, the sun never sets :); it's part of the Commonwealth, which means that the Queen is officially head of state. Practically, it seems to mean the odd state visit here and there, to allow someone a pot-shot at Prince Charles :)
Re:Not the first time (Score:1)
The Sun never sets on the British Commonwealth! (Score:1)
Incidentally back in my grandfather's day the wags used to add to that
:-)
Cheers,
Ben
firewall ? (Score:1)
The firewall (where I work) is running Solaris, and all of the servers in the DMZ are running IIS or apache. Perhaps the firewall has changed, or the firewall was changed to linux.
No way to tell, if they are behind a tuff firewall.
Re:I can see it now: (Score:1)
Re:"Ma'am"? (Score:1)
Re:This is just the beginning (Score:2)
I thought the US system was summed up well many years ago, when the Beyond the Fringe gang explained the political system in the US to a UK person: ``There are two parties in the US: the Republican party, which is the equivalant of our Tory party, and the Democratic party, which is the equivalant of our Tory party.''
cjs
Not the first time (Score:3)
I bet she got sick of recompiling KDE and just installs it from RPMs nowadays.
Re:Not the first time (Score:1)
Maybe she found Solaris licensees to expensive to maintain. Hmmm. Pehaps not - I guess there must have been another reason to switch to Red Hat. I wonder what.
-W
Well paint me wrong (Score:1)
Re:Those Royals (Score:1)
Those Royals (Score:2)
Should Australia become a republic?
1 Yes
2 No
3 No, because they use linux
Perhaps this is the best thing related to the royal family that has happened in a long while
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re:Fucking moderators (Score:1)
Get a clue.
j.
Re:Linux: (Score:1)
j.
Who made the decision? (Score:2)
:-)
Cheers,
Ben
Re:"Ma'am"? (Score:1)
j.
Why did she do it? (Score:1)
I have no idea, but I kind of doubt it was due to monetary concerns.
I never did like SunOS or Solaris, though. At work the "time clock" runs on SunOS and is practically guaranteed to go down each and every day. I hate writing times down in a book.
Re:No 'merkins that time, buddy (Score:1)
I think the proof-of-capability bombing of the airfield at Port Stanley by an RAF Vulcan was pretty cool - pitty one of them had to go and break a refuelling boom so it couldn't make it back to home soil...
j.
Hail holy Queen enthroned above.. (Score:1)
But the queen does need a stable website like she needed that hip replacement. After all, if another one of the royals die, she can totally ignore their death on a stable server.
Fumbling towards royalty,
Matthew
_____________________________________
Re:That's impressive. NOT! (Score:1)
'It was a civil war. Therefore, we kicked our own butts'.
j.
I can see it now: (Score:4)
Re:Princess Diana... (Score:1)
:-)
james
Re:I can see it now: (Score:1)
Cretin (Score:1)
This may be a bit off topic, but... (Score:5)
...could any of you Linux experts give an old lady a hand?
Now that I got the server and the firewall running fine and dandy, I have been trying to set up a WWW site that would allow me to map the genealogical data of our fairly unique family tree. I'd like to find an application that would enable me to do this automatically.
All of the software I've tried so far crashes with "Too many unreferenced child nodes", "Circular references not permitted" or "Tree does not branch".
Any tips are greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, dudes!
st4y k00l,
Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and West Indies^W^W^W
Re:Those Royals (Score:1)
BTW, most of us Brits really don't care about the Queen anyway, and whether people want or don't want the Queen to have anything to do with their country doesn't matter to us. We don't give a shit, and I seriously doubt the Queen cares much either.
Why not rant about something that has meaning in today's world, like Tibet or East Timor or something.
This is just the beginning (Score:2)
"Finally Labour is going back to its proletarian roots" an enthusiastic Christopher Hitchens was quoted as saying, expressing his hope that the adoption of OpenSource "will hasten the demise of that bunch of inbred, brain-addled morons". Asked to specify who he was refering to (Labour or the Crown), Hitchens declined to comment.
Others were not so thrilled. An angry Richard Stallman summoned the British consul to his Boston office and upbraided the diplomat for "the imperial arrogance" shown by the crown by not referring to "Red Hat GNU/Linux".
Meanwhile the Conservative Party expressed regret that the Queen had not "shown support for free enterprise and Capitalism" by adopting Microsoft's Internet Server. A spokesman for the Tories added, "we'll have lots more to say about this on our web site, just as soon as we reboot".
Re:mesasage to british royalty (Score:1)
Kudos to the Queen? (Score:1)
Re:"Ma'am"? (Score:1)
To me, a Greek citizen (that has lived for several years in Scotland btw), she is just another person. I would probably ignore her or just say "Hi there, what's up?" if I met her.
Just FYI, The Greek constitution prohibits Greek citizens from accepting titles of honour. Which makes sense. After all, how can all people be equal if some are more equal than others (as George Orwell put it very eloquently)?
No offence, but in my book absolutely noone has to address British Lords, Sirs, Dukes and whatnot with their title. If they are offended, tough. I don't care. If they are disappointed that people in other countries don't treat them in a special way, again, that's tough. Expecting to be treated as royalty outside the empire (what's left of it anyway) is really backwards. They should just be glad that the majority of the brits still do them the courtesy of using their titles and maintaining monarchy, for it will not last long IMHO.
-W
Re:"Ma'am"? (Score:1)
You do realize that most of the world sees the queen as the mascot of the Great Britian. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who wears a title of nobility deserves disrespect, regardless of what she represents. But then again, that's just my Yankee egalitarianism talking.
And I wonder.. (Score:1)
Face it.. they're both great operating systems.
...
Re:Is this an argument for BSD ? (Score:1)
Re:Not the first time (Score:1)
Re:Linux: (Score:1)
erally be serious, they said they were joking.. meanwhile, they keep missing that one
single, all important line of perl code in linux v2.2
Re:whoooohooo!!! (Score:1)
char *stupidsig = "this is my dumb sig";
Silly Americans (Re:DESTROY THE BRITISH MONARCHY!) (Score:1)
Since the IRA stopped taking money to blow up busloads of schoolchildren you Americans just don't know what to do with yourselves.
> Break free of the obsolete monarchy
You're living in the past, man.
On a related note (Score:1)
President vs Majesty (Score:1)
1) elected by the people
2) remains an equal person, paying taxes and all.
In that sense, it's nothing more than a job title. I can't really say that about "Majesty" -it is VERY different. I am quite confident that the majority of people out there can discern the difference, and I wouldn't like to explain it in detail.
As for not addressing a queen as "Her Majesty" I don't find that disrespectful, since I simply don't recognize "Her Majesty" and I have no reason to do so. I am not being a troll here - don't misunderstand me. I'm just trying to make a point - I am a citizen of a country that all people are equal, and I find titles of honour redundant and offending. You wouldn't find me using them, and if a Queen of some other contry is offended or something if I don't address her as "Your Majesty", well, that's none of my business, she should get over it.
-W
Re:President vs Majesty (Score:1)
I'm from the U.K. and I think that the Queen doesn't serve any useful purpose apart from bringing in the tourists. If I ever met her, I wouldn't call her a freeloader to her face. It's not because I recognise her importance, it's just that I am polite. Big deal if you respect the president of Greece more than the Queen of the U.K. They both deserve our respect and courtesy. Learn some diplomacy sometime.
Re:"Ma'am"? (Score:1)
It's all colour-coordination..... (Score:2)
Re:I can see it now: (Score:1)
Well - not immediately. To get the official "By Appointment to HRH" one has to have been a regular supplier to the Royal Family for over 3 years.
Oh, and you still have to actually apply for it too
Finally, it's issued to a named individual rather than an organisation.
However, it must be nearly time for someone within the Apache group to apply.... even when on Solaris HRH was using Apache.
S.
Wrong Choice. (Score:1)
I believe that for something like this, security should override all other concerns. That, and the price is approximately the same. Also, Red Hat is known not to be the world's most secure Linux distribution.
I just hope the Royal Webmaster knows how to find and close the security holes that might exist...
You missed my point. (Score:1)
I understand your point of being polite perfectly, but I didn't say that I'd call her a freeloader to her face - that is something *you* suggested. I agree totally with showing courtesy and respect to people that deserve it.
Maybe it's my greek egalitarian ideology, maybe I'm nuts, bottomline is I do not and will not show extra courtesy or respect to someone *just* because they have a title of honour. I do not, and will not recognize them as valid - in my book, the Queen or any queen for that matter is equal to every other person on this planet. Now, if a person holding a title of honour *expects* everyone to treat them with extra courtesy and respect, compared to 'mere mortals' so to speak, and they are offended because someone doesn't *that's* their problem, and they should get over it.
I stated from the start that I don't particularly like the idea of Monarchy, but I like to belive that I am a reasonable person. I hope that clears it up.
-W
Re:Queen of *BRITAIN* (Score:1)
Re:Those Royals (Score:1)
Re:This is just the beginning (Score:1)
Re:Queen of *BRITAIN* (Score:1)
Anywho... the first king of the UK was James Stuart, AKA, The King of Scotland. And the Queen Mother is Scottish too. Just thought I'd inform you...
The Scottish rule the world.
Re:This is just the beginning (Score:1)
Re:I can see it now: (Score:1)
Will he have a Penguin on his Coat of Arms?
Re:You missed my point. (Score:1)
Probably just a poor choice of words then. Sorry. But calling the Queen "Your Majesty" isn't a case of acknowledging that she is a better person than anyone else, in my opinion. It's just a case of recognising that she holds a position of authority over me. I would call her that whether or not I was a British citizen, because a title is mostly just tradition anyway.
I'm basically in agreement with you though. I don't believe anyone is a better human being just because of their heritage. That would be bordering on racism as far as I can tell.
For the record though, I don't respect our Prime Minister for getting elected by the public any more than I respect the Teletubbies for getting to number one in the music charts. It's basically the same thing, isn't it? Except for the fact the Teletubbies didn't lie to the public about what they would get if they bought their single.
Re:Hail holy Queen enthroned above.. (Score:1)
> of the kennedy family died by coincidence, do > you?
Of course not, but that was the CIA, not the royals
linux: the gnu choice of world governments (Score:1)
on a serious note: this is really cool. i wonder what microsoft thinks about loosing american government support? on the point of the royal family sacking solaris, well, i used to play solaris on my atari 2600, it was cool then but pretty out of date now. 8^)
whoooohooo!!! (Score:1)
char *stupidsig = "this is my dumb sig";
The queen can not stand the Slashdot Republic Army (Score:1)
Re:We can't be sure she's serious about Linux... (Score:1)
Re:"Ma'am"? (Score:1)
1) Isn't scotland awesome!
2) In the US, it takes an act of congress (not easy, since congress doesn't do anything) to be able to accept a title.
um... no (Score:1)
Australia may become a republic in a few years it's true... but they haven't decided yet. And yes they could still remain in the Commonwealth after becoming a republic. There have been several republics in the Commonwealth for some time.
Re:DESTROY THE BRITISH MONARCHY! (Score:1)
I'm pro-Monarchy, but only 'cos they make a nice tourist attraction.
"I want to use software that doesn't suck." - ESR
"All software that isn't free sucks." - RMS
seriously (Score:1)
according to another majoritoristic view, she couldn't be said to be serious about Linux until she sports a Tux the penguin
Re:DESTROY THE BRITISH MONARCHY! (Score:1)
Re:DESTROY THE BRITISH MONARCHY! (Score:1)
Re:President vs Majesty (Score:1)
Re:That's impressive. NOT! (Score:1)
What Next? (Score:1)
whitehouse.gov running Debain?
nsa.gov running LinuxPPC?
Slashdot.org running IIS
Re:That's impressive. NOT! (Score:1)
So the article was not something you were interested in? Rob can't please everyones literary tastes. It was just a harmless story to say somebody in the public eye has their site hosted with our beloved OS.
Did it ever occur to you to just skip onto something else? Your post served only to get on peoples nerves. It doesn't surprise me at all that you're a 'anonymous coward'.
Best wishes,
Brit who'd kick your ass
Queen of *BRITAIN* (Score:1)
was still the Queen up here in Scotland, which
means she is the Queen of Britain, even though
I hate her, I'd prefer it if people stopped
treating the UK as England, and ignoring the
fact Scotland (and Wales, and Northern Ireland)
exist.
--
David Taylor
davidt-sd@xfiles.nildram.spam.co.uk
[To e-mail me: s/\.spam//]
Re:Why did she do it? (Score:1)
of coarse not, that is why this is so cool. Linux was chooosen purely because it's a good os.
char *stupidsig = "this is my dumb sig";
Re:Idiot troll (Score:1)
I just changed my mind, lets remain a monarchy.. it could be worse, you could end up as our queen
Re:Queen of *BRITAIN* (Score:1)
In fact I _think_ she is probably the Queen of
the Commonwealth.
Either way she is still the Queen of England even if she is also the queen of a bunch of other countries as well.
No 'merkins that time, buddy (Score:1)
However, the US Navy airbase at Kindley Field, Bermuda (British soil on loan) did give a few Harrier pilots a helping hand and a bit of fuel on their way from Farnborough to Ascencion.
I dub you Sir Torvalds (Score:1)
Re:Those Royals (Score:1)
We're all at it over here (Score:1)
Linux: (Score:2)
Does anyone else think it's ironic that an operating system with designs on "world domination" is being embraced wholeheartedly by governments around the world?
---
Put Hemos through English 101!
"An armed society is a polite society" -- Robert Heinlein
She wore on in 1998! (Score:2)
less so in this one [royal.gov.uk]
Re:Not the first time (Score:1)
Solaris packaged KDE installations, available
right off the KDE main site.
pkgadd -d, baby.
--
Brandon Hume
hume -> BOFH.Halifax.NS.Ca, http://WWW.BOFH.Halifax.NS.Ca/