Slashdot Log In
Linux Now an Equal Flash Player
Posted by
timothy
on Wednesday October 15, @04:12PM
from the cheek-by-jowl dept.
from the cheek-by-jowl dept.
nerdyH writes "As recently as 2007, Linux users waited six months for Flash 9 to arrive. Now, with Microsoft pushing its Silverlight alternative, Adobe is touting the universality of its Flash format, which has penetrated '98 percent of Internet-enabled desktops,' it claims. And, it today released Flash 10 for Linux concurrently with other platforms. Welcome to the future." Handily enough, Real Networks released this summer RealPlayer 11 for Linux, the first release for which they've included a .deb package, and offers nightly builds of their Helix player, for which Linux is one of the supported platforms.
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

yay competition! (Score:5, Insightful)
Now make them do the same with Photoshop.
Reply to This
Re:yay competition! (Score:5, Funny)
Now make them do the same with Photoshop.
Tomorrow MS will announce that Windows Paint runs under wine!
Reply to This
Parent
Some more equal than others... (Score:5, Interesting)
Looks like they changed it during they beta to require glibc 2.4-based Linux distributions (RHEL 4, CentOS 4, Debian 4 are out) for stack-smashing protection.
Link [adobe.com].
Reply to This
Parent
Competition is good! (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
The future? (Score:5, Insightful)
There's still no 64-bit version yet!
Reply to This
Re:No 64-bit (Score:5, Interesting)
My theory is that Adobe's Flash player is a horrible hack that is so utterly fragile and bug-ridden that Adobe can't actually make a 64-bit version without doing a full rewrite.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:The future? (Score:5, Insightful)
Indeed; that was the first thing I checked upon reading this story.
I'm sorry, but I'd rather have a 6 month wait and a 64-bit version than concurrent releases. Linux has been running on AMD64 for what now? Three or four years? And now that Vista runs on 64-bit as well there's even less excuse for this. Hell, they're even got a version for the Sparc.
I don't mean to belittle the fact this story. It is pretty cool that Adobe seems to at least recognize linux as a worthwhile platform*, it's just that support is still rather lackluster.
(*While I would think that this would have to do with the increasingly common use of linux on embedded devices, the fact that there's no ARM version seems to contradict this. However, I suspect there's a (secret) version somewhere since I'm seen embedded linux devices that play flash.)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:The future? (Score:5, Insightful)
Or running a 64-bit system?
Reply to This
Parent
Re:The future? (Score:5, Insightful)
Us nspluginwrapper.
Actually if Firefox would support 32 bit plug ins under Linux that would also solve the issue.
Or the Distros could include 32bit Firefox be default.
Both would solve the problem. And if you need Firefox to be 64bit you are surfing the wrong sites.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:The future? (Score:5, Informative)
nspluginwrapper blows.
There's no nice way to put it. It crashes, or "loses connection" to the plugin half the time.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:The future? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm pretty sure you already do run it NAIVELY it you think that you need it to be 64 bit!
Reply to This
Parent
Outstanding!!!! (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
And what about the embedded version for wii/etc? (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
This is News (Score:5, Interesting)
Reply to This
It was worse than that... (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Go Home Silverlight (Score:5, Funny)
Competition is good and all, but this is just annoying. It only exists to muddy the waters.
I'm just waiting for MS to announce that they will no longer speak english, but will communicate only in Anglush-Sharp. A language in which every noun is copyrighted by Microsoft and only MS approved verbs will generate an intelligible response.
Reply to This
Re:RealPlayer? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:RealPlayer? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:RealPlayer? (Score:5, Funny)
What's that?
It's just a story we tell to scare the kids.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:RealPlayer? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah. I thought the same thing. Real represented every wrong way to market and produce a product. It was neat in the beginning (well, it was pretty much the first, as far as I know), but as time went on, it became a bloated, spyware ridden piece of garbage far inferior to all of its competitors.
Honestly, I didn't know Real was still around. I wouldn't let that software near my windows machines, much less the Linux ones.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:RealPlayer? (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:No deal. (Score:5, Informative)
umm......
GASH?
They have published the specs and the FOSS player isn't soup yet. So stop complaining and start coding buddy.
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/ [gnu.org]
So get to work...
Reply to This
Parent
Re: news is already available (Score:5, Interesting)
Most of the 64-bit work is still in the opensource Tamarin Project. You can still contribute, if you've got the chops.
http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2006/10/whats_so_difficult_64bit_editi.html [adobe.com]
http://www.kaourantin.net/2006/11/spidermonkeys-relative-tamarin-joins.html [kaourantin.net]
The "we'll maintain it for you" line has not particularly been borne out by experience.... ;-)
jd/adobe
Reply to This
Parent
Re:YAY another binary release (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:All platforms? (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent