Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Linux Turns 17 Today

Posted by kdawson on Sun Oct 05, 2008 09:54 PM
from the hippo-birdies dept.
Meshach writes "Over at the Linux Journal, Doc Searles is noting that today marks 17 years since Linus posted to Usenet, starting Linux (post). As a Linux user at work and at home I say, thanks Linus!" The anniversary is also featured on the top page of the Encyclopedia Britannica.
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by BaldGhoti (265981) on Sunday October 05 2008, @09:55PM (#25268933) Homepage
    One more year and it should be legal.
  • by narcberry (1328009) on Sunday October 05 2008, @10:00PM (#25268955) Journal

    It is currently meant for hackers

    OMG SHUT IT DOWN!!!

      • Re:Made for hackers (Score:5, Informative)

        by Mick R (932337) on Sunday October 05 2008, @10:18PM (#25269051)
        Don't mistake the word "hacker" for what the ill-informed media use it to mean. It is the popular media that have given the term a negative meaning, and then only in recent years. It WAS a positive term, and STILL IS to those who know what it really means.
  • what (Score:5, Funny)

    by mikesd81 (518581) <mikesd1@@@verizon...net> on Sunday October 05 2008, @10:06PM (#25268983) Homepage
    No google logo for this?! I expected a penguin or something like that.
  • by LM741N (258038) on Sunday October 05 2008, @10:20PM (#25269065)

    Its called Ubuntu and he is supposed to be 60 years old and lives as a zoo keeper, naming all of his projects after various animals there.

  • by Nyall (646782) on Sunday October 05 2008, @10:47PM (#25269223) Homepage

    Time keeps flowing.

  • "Barely Legal"
  • 17 years... (Score:5, Funny)

    by rampant mac (561036) on Sunday October 05 2008, @11:17PM (#25269403)

    Obligatory:

    1991 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 1992 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 1993 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 1994 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 1995 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 1996 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 1997 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 1998 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 1999 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 2000 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 2001 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 2002 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 2003 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 2004 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 2005 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 2006 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 2007 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!, 2008 - This is the year of the Linux desktop!

    Stupid whitespace filter, yadda yadda

      • by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 06 2008, @12:26AM (#25269791)

        I'll never forget the day I was at a large meeting with my clients. They never took me seriously and in fact started leaving the room. Turns out it was because my dick was hanging out of my pants. Never again will I use velcro. From that day forward, it was zipper only!

    • by mcrbids (148650) on Sunday October 05 2008, @11:44PM (#25269575) Journal

      Mod down? No. But there's an important distinction: to get technical excellence, you have to have some way to filter out technical mediocrity. Therefore, in an environment demanding technical excellence, those who are technically mediocre will feel slighted and rejected.

      Building excellence is not about "feeling good", a bunch of hairy hippies sitting around in Buddha style kumbaya. It's about building excellence, and it's not always pretty.

      Linus is very forward and very direct; a display of the confidence that comes from years of proven experience producing and overseeing real, valuable excellence. He's OK with stating his opinion very openly and succinctly, confident that if his ideas are wrong, they'll be picked apart ruthlessly and publicly.

      Linus has done an amazing job of coordinating an insane amount of information in one of the largest, most complex, and most distributed project ever attempted by mankind. And he accepts that his ideas are only valuable if they are RIGHT by the standards of excellence.

      I don't care if he is "polite", he is an amazing fellow simply because he's OK with being wrong, and puts his ego in 2nd place after technical excellence!

      This is the hallmark of good science and good engineering: when who has the right answer is less important than what's the right answer!

      Hugs to Linus!

      • by zkiwi34 (974563) on Sunday October 05 2008, @10:50PM (#25269249)
        I'd say he (Linus) is far far more humble than Gates, Ballmer, Ellison et al. In fact, I should add that I rather think RMS is shy and retiring compared to those guys.
      • by saleenS281 (859657) on Sunday October 05 2008, @10:52PM (#25269257) Homepage
        Ya frigging Stallman. While he may be a bit off his rocker... he only created the license Linux currently uses, as well as the compiler it was created with. Other than that, a COMPLETE hackjob.

        Or did you conveniently forget that it's GNU/Linux? Without Stallman you likely wouldn't have Linux at all.
        • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 05 2008, @11:10PM (#25269355)

          Or did you conveniently forget that it's GNU/Linux?

          Ahem, did *you* conveniently forget that it's [Mozilla|Konqueror]/OpenOffice.org/KDE/QT/[X.org|XFree86]/GNU/Linux?

        • Re:Linus... humble!? (Score:5, Interesting)

          by BobNET (119675) on Monday October 06 2008, @12:29AM (#25269813)

          Or did you conveniently forget that it's GNU/Linux?

          Like how people conveniently forget that it wasn't published under the GPL until late 1992. Or that it can currently be compiled with at least one compiler other than GCC. Or that it's possible to run it with a modified *BSD userland and non-glibc C library. But yeah, aside from that, it's all Stallman's doing...