Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Debian's Testing Branch Nears Completion

Posted by timothy on Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:10 PM
from the apt-remains-a-fantastic-argument dept.
DeviceGuru writes "With Debian Lenny (aka 'testing') poised to displace Etch as the popular Linux distribution's 'stable' branch possibly as soon as next month, blogger Rick Lehrbaum loaded the latest preview (beta 2) of Lenny's KDE CD image onto an available Thinkpad, and took it for a spin. How's it coming along? After detailing a handful of issues — and offering solutions for each (except Bluetooth support) — he concludes: 'Other than the need for a few hacks and fixes, my main complaint with it is its inclusion of way too many of KDE's rich set of applications, such as games, tools, etc.' From the looks of it, looks like Lenny might be the new 'Debian stable' soon!"
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Debian Lenny Installer RC1 Arrives 81 comments
nerdyH writes "It appears that Debian 5.0 (aka "Lenny") will soon take its big binocular eyes out into the wider world. Only two months later than expected, the Debian project has completed the first release candidate of Lenny's installer. Featuring much faster installation from "live" CDs, and expanded support for ARM-based devices such as NAS servers, Lenny has gestated for 19 months, compared to 21 months for the previous "Etch" release. Lookout, world, Debian releases are picking up speed! The download is here."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 14 2008, @11:24PM (#24610407)
    It's only been sixteen months since Etch was released, not three years! Something's wrong!
  • by bcrowell (177657) on Friday August 15 2008, @12:04AM (#24610705) Homepage
    I have a server running stable, and I don't have physical access to it. Does anyone have any practical advice on the safest way to handle the upgrade? Is a debian "stable" really stable when it first comes out, or is it better to wait a while? Basically, what I understand of the procedure is something like this:
    1. Read the readme -- where do I find it?
    2. apt-get update
    3. apt-get dist-upgrade

    I'm a little leery of this, since I've rendered ubuntu desktop systems unbootable by doing 2 and 3 -- and was told that it was because I should have done 1.

    • by dcam (615646) <david&uberconcept,com> on Friday August 15 2008, @12:17AM (#24610795) Homepage

      I am by no means an expert, however I have upgraded a couple of servers that I don't have physical access to.

      I've normally tried to upgrade a server that I do have physical access to before upgrading the offsite server(s). So long as the server comes back up and ssh is still running pretty much everything else can be sorted out after a little time, the logs and google.

      Ideally similar hardware.

      Oh and googling around to see if anyone has hit problems doing the upgrade.

    • by gardyloo (512791) on Friday August 15 2008, @12:39AM (#24610943)

      At least do a simulated dist-upgrade by using the -s switch before doing the "real" one!

            apt-get -s dist-upgrade

      Sometimes, just sometimes, it'll catch things which might go wrong before they actually happen.

      • Good Point (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Gazzonyx (982402) on Friday August 15 2008, @02:12AM (#24611441)

        Everyone becomes conservative with upgrades after the first time that a box 3000 miles away fails to come back up. Seriously, waiting for a remote reboot after a kernel update is always the longest two minutes of my life.

        Even the headless boxes at my apartment wait for me to set aside time to haul out a monitor and keyboard if anything goes wrong during an update. It's better to assume that something will go wrong and be pleasantly surprised and ahead of schedule than to sit staring at pings that have been timing out for the last five minutes (while you think, maybe it's just taking a long time to init... yeah, right!).

        And, regardless of what anyone says, a virtual machine test environment doesn't have anywhere near the complications that you get with heavy metal. A successful virtual machine test just means that nothing is assured to go wrong, nothing more.

  • by Twitchimus (415770) on Friday August 15 2008, @12:29AM (#24610887)

    OK, so the gentleman downloaded and installed the *KDE* version of Debian Lenny, and then says his main complaint "is its inclusion of way too many of KDE's rich set of applications, such as games, tools, etc."

    I can understand that; I once installed Windows XP, but there were far too many Microsoft applications for my liking.

  • by Sipper (462582) on Friday August 15 2008, @01:56AM (#24611385)

    I read The Fine Article; a few comments on the author's article:

    Iceweasel
    =-=-=-=-=
    One of the complaints is that he wants "real" Firefox rather than the renamed Iceweasel. Well, until the Mozilla Foundation says differently, that isn't possible. Mozilla withdrew their prior permission to ship Firefox with a replaced logo that fit the Debian Free Software Guidelines, and the only way to comply with both Mozilla and the DFSG was to rename the application. So if you want to complain about this, write to Mozilla. I think Debian totally made the right choice to rename.

    Shorter explanation:
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_IceCat [wikipedia.org]
    Longer explanation:
          http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622 [debian.org]

    Playing a DVD
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=
    The author wasn't able to test playing a DVD; normal movie DVDs that use encryption won't play out of the box. This is because Debian cannot ship libdvdcss2 as part of the main distribution for legal reasons, same as other distributions. There are other external repositories (outside of the US) that contain libdvdcss2 -- but it may not be legal to import the package into the US. You might find some choices if you put "Debian" and "multimedia" into Google and see what comes up.

    Modem
    =-=-=-=
    Wow, the author set up the POTS modem. When is the last time you had to use one of those? Gotta give him credit for going through that effort.

    - Chris

    • by kriebz (258828) <kriebz@gmail.com> on Thursday August 14 2008, @11:29PM (#24610431)

      'kde' is just a metapackage: it depends on the packages in that list (directly or indirectly). There's nothing wrong with leaving those other packages installed. The new apt/dpkg conventions try to help you remove cruft, so they let you remove those packages with `apt-get autoremove`. Instead of that, install a few that you need by hand to remove them from the list. When you don't see any in this list that you want, then run auto-remove.

        • by Darkness404 (1287218) on Thursday August 14 2008, @11:41PM (#24610515)
          But KDE is simply a metapackage much like ubuntu-desktop, for example, if you want to install KDE you simply do sudo apt-get install kde, removing the package KDE only removes the KDE metapackage.

          The only point of the KDE metapackage is to provide a 1-click install for KDE.
            • by obi (118631) on Friday August 15 2008, @12:08AM (#24610739)
              Read what apt says.

              "The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:"
              This does _not_ mean they're going to be removed.

              "The following packages will be REMOVED:"
              Only that specific convenience meta-package gets removed.

              To further illustrate this, check this line:
              "After this operation, 41.0kB disk space will be freed."
              Somehow I think KDE takes more than 41.0kB, don't you?

              If you really wanted to remove the kde meta-package together with all the dependencies that it pulled in (so all the things you didn't explicitly apt-get install yourself), you'd use "apt-get autoremove kde".
    • by Telvin_3d (855514) on Thursday August 14 2008, @11:37PM (#24610489)

      Wait, your OS of choice has 50MB of extra stuff? Oh God, th world is ending! How will you possibly manage if you can't free up that massive portion of your dozens and dozens of GB of storage? It's a travesty! We should lynch the developers!

        • by clang_jangle (975789) * on Friday August 15 2008, @12:57AM (#24611045)

          Some of us already live in the future and use SSD on our laptops. Every gigabyte here is precious, since there's often not dozens, hardly even one dozen.

          Funny, that doesn't sound like the future to me. Sounds more like you're living in a solid state version of 1997.

    • Re:Still not ready (Score:4, Informative)

      by clang_jangle (975789) * on Friday August 15 2008, @12:41AM (#24610957)

      Hacking to get Wifi working, hacking to get PPP working, hacking config files to get sound working properly and no bluetooth. And Freetards will have everyone believe GNU/Linux is ready for most people's desktops. Sorry, but it's still failing in this market.

      Debian is mainly used as a server OS, it isn't generally held up as a shining example of how Linux is ready for the desktop. It is fairly widely used in production environments, and by developers and other geeky types, and it is considered an excellent stable base for other, more specialised distros. Like, for example, Ubuntu -- which is more than "ready" for the desktop.

      Yeah, yeah. -1 Truth. Mod me down, but some of you Freetards will read this, and you know deep-down that it's true. We really need to stop shoving GNU/Linux down people's throats, until it's ready for the desktop.

      In order to criticize in a meaningful way, one needs to know the subject at hand. Otherwise, you're just trolling and making inappropriate noise. And really, "freetards"? What kind of "tard" does that make you then? :) [HINT: This is a geek forum.]

    • Re:freebsd (Score:5, Funny)

      by westyvw (653833) on Friday August 15 2008, @01:12AM (#24611155)
      ROFLMAO : If i want debian that ISNT as cutting edge? With the super fast release cycles of debian stable whizzing out of the gate so fast I too say : Slow Down, lets not get carried away!
      • Re:freebsd (Score:5, Funny)

        by beav007 (746004) on Friday August 15 2008, @04:03AM (#24612003) Journal
        I resent that. I'm personally looking forward to the new release of Debian. I've been hearing good things about KDE3, so I'm hoping that it's stable enough to be included in this version.

        I also hear that some mysterious issues with OpenSSL have been fixed by Debian developers, which could save us from memory leaks and increase performance. Personally, I'm amazed that the OpenSSL devs haven't fixed this issue themselves yet.

        Obviously, this distro is where all the exciting new development action happens. I'm very excited to be on the bleeding edge with Debian!