Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Washington State LUG to Hold "Nerd Auction"

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed Sep 26, 2007 04:11 PM
from the no-one-really-free-until-nerd-persecution-ends dept.
elrous0 writes "As part of a PR stunt, a Washington Linux user group is holding a "Nerd Auction" and appealing to local sororities to exchange dates and makeover advice for their computer skills and homework assistance. 'The problem is that we're all still nerds. Let's face it, guys. If anyone's going to bid on us, we'll need some spicing up,' writes Washington State Linux Users Group president Ben Ford on the group's website. 'And who better to help with that than sorority girls who like nothing better than a makeover?' So far there has been no comment on how a Linux user group is going to help sorority girls with their Windows machines."

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • How to help... (Score:5, Funny)

    by psychicsword (1036852) * on Wednesday September 26, @04:13PM (#20760353)

    So far there has been no comment on how a Linux user group is going to help sorority girls with their Windows machines.

    Isn't it obvious, by installing linux.
    • Re:How to help... (Score:5, Funny)

      by IdleTime (561841) on Wednesday September 26, @04:15PM (#20760395)
      Like, only if your brain isn't like a sorority girl, like!
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:How to help... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by happyemoticon (543015) on Wednesday September 26, @04:21PM (#20760519)
      (http://www.wavenger.com/)

      Yeah, and the superior stability of Linux means her computer will never get infected with adware, viruses, or even slow down on boot time. In fact, it'll never have any problems short of a hard drive crash, motherboard failure, or power supply failure. What good is that? You'll never get to see her again.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:How to help... by Arabani (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @04:23PM
      • Re:How to help... (Score:5, Funny)

        by fuzzix (700457) <fuzzbucket@eircom.net> on Wednesday September 26, @04:36PM (#20760753)
        (http://fuzzbucket.tk/ | Last Journal: Sunday May 14 2006, @05:22PM)

        Yeah, and the superior stability of Linux means her computer will never get infected with adware, viruses, or even slow down on boot time. In fact, it'll never have any problems short of a hard drive crash, motherboard failure, or power supply failure. What good is that? You'll never get to see her again.
        This is why you make sure her sshd is available from outside... ;)

        "Your research paper DISAPPEARED?! That's awful... Two months of work, you say? I'll be right over!"
        [ Parent ]
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:How to help... by misleb (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @04:38PM
        • Re:How to help... (Score:5, Funny)

          by happyemoticon (543015) on Wednesday September 26, @05:10PM (#20761219)
          (http://www.wavenger.com/)

          I just looked it up. Pretty funny. I'll quote it for anyone equally uninformed:

          An engineer was crossing a road one day, when a frog called out to him and said, "If you kiss me, I'll turn into a beautiful princess." He bent over, picked up the frog and put it in his pocket. The frog spoke up again and said, "If you kiss me and turn me back into a beautiful princess, I will stay with you for one week." The engineer took the frog out of his pocket, smiled at it and returned it to the pocket. The frog then cried out, "If you kiss me and turn me back into a princess, I'll stay with you for one week and do ANYTHING you want." Again, the engineer took the frog out, smiled at it and put it back into his pocket. Finally, the frog asked,

          "What is the matter? I've told you I'm a beautiful princess, and that I'll stay with you for one week and do anything you want. Why won't you kiss me?" The engineer said, "Look, I'm an engineer. I don't have time for a girlfriend, but a talking frog, now that's cool."
          [ Parent ]
      • Re:How to help... (Score:5, Funny)

        by Mr. Underbridge (666784) on Wednesday September 26, @04:57PM (#20761037)

        What good is that? You'll never get to see her again.

        Like you didn't give yourself a shell account with superuser access. Come on. You'll be able to make that thing stop working at will!

        That and you'll install software to remotely control her webcam anyway. You'll definitely be seeing her...

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:How to help... by SpottedKuh (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @05:11PM
      • Re:How to help... by Bender Unit 22 (Score:3) Wednesday September 26, @05:37PM
      • Pfft! Amateur. (Score:5, Funny)

        by Penguinisto (415985) on Wednesday September 26, @05:39PM (#20761529)
        (Last Journal: Friday March 26 2004, @02:46PM)
        Get root on the machine, then type this:

        # echo "10 17 * * 5 root (ifconfig eth0 down ; ifconfig eth1 down ; wall "Your computer is broken, please call $NERD at $PHONE immediately")" > /etc/crontab

        ...guaranteed you'll have at least one babe calling you once a week, ne? And be sure to set your frickin' variables before you type that.

        (I swear, it's like the mere mention of meeting a chick turns off the whole BOFH part of the brain with you people...)

        /P

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:How to help... by kgskgs (Score:1) Wednesday September 26, @06:20PM
      • Re:How to help... by bl8n8r (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @07:15PM
      • Re:This is the Root of the Geek Problem by happyemoticon (Score:3) Thursday September 27, @12:09PM
      • Re:This is the Root of the Geek Problem by PitaBred (Score:2) Thursday September 27, @02:58PM
      • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:How to help... (Score:5, Funny)

      by eln (21727) * on Wednesday September 26, @04:34PM (#20760717)
      That's exactly what will happen. The geeks install linux, and the sorority girls kick the geeks in the nuts for ruining their computers. In this way, everyone wins. The sorority girls get to tell their professors they can't do their homework because their computers are toasted, thereby giving them more free time to attempt to get impregnated by the football team, and the geeks get more contact from a human female than they have ever gotten or will ever get again.

      This is the very definition of "win-win".
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:How to help... by Marxist Hacker 42 (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @04:39PM
    • Re:How to help... by jackb_guppy (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @05:36PM
    • Re:Not to worry . . . by fractoid (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @10:14PM
    • Re:Not to worry . . . by BlackSnake112 (Score:1) Thursday September 27, @10:03AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • If there's one good reason to support windows, it's to help sorority girls upload their pajama party photos to your^H^H^H^H their flickr account.
  • NOT Washington State LUG. (Score:5, Informative)

    by Frosty Piss (770223) on Wednesday September 26, @04:18PM (#20760445)
    (http://www.nojailforpot.com/)
    This is not the Washington State LUG, it's the Washington State University LUG
  • Optimistic (Score:5, Insightful)

    by spleen_blender (949762) on Wednesday September 26, @04:18PM (#20760455)
    The sorority girls probably aren't going to bite. They know they can get nerds like us to work on their computer and homework assignments and have to give nothing in return. They just have to be... girls. This is sort of like people boycotting gasoline... it just won't work. They can hold out indefinitely since they have other sources of income (read: non-nerds sexing them up) where as we will sit there demanding cheaper gas (read: any sexing up).
    • Re:Optimistic by Russ Nelson (Score:1) Wednesday September 26, @04:23PM
      • Re:Optimistic by Anonymous Coward (Score:3) Wednesday September 26, @04:45PM
      • Re:Optimistic by ksheff (Score:1) Wednesday September 26, @04:57PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Optimistic by revlayle (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @04:23PM
    • Re:Optimistic (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Stringer Bell (989985) on Wednesday September 26, @04:24PM (#20760575)
      Confidence is sexy, according to my wife and most of her girlfriends. Be nervous, introspective, self-conscious, and "girls don't like nerds" becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Optimistic by 91degrees (Score:1) Wednesday September 26, @04:26PM
    • Re:Optimistic by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 26, @04:43PM
      • Re:Optimistic by Toonol (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @05:39PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Optimistic by ksheff (Score:1) Wednesday September 26, @07:25PM
        • Re:Optimistic by sanosuke76 (Score:1) Thursday September 27, @05:32PM
        • Re:Optimistic by ksheff (Score:1) Friday September 28, @04:11AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Optimistic by ksheff (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @04:53PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • As I've been saying before (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Moraelin (679338) on Wednesday September 26, @05:03PM (#20761123)
      (Last Journal: Monday June 21 2004, @04:25PM)
      As I've been saying before, the situation is pretty skewed for both genders.

      - About half the guys in a high school or university want the top 10 super-models. Move a bit lower and about 90% of the guys want the top 10% girls. Some might eventually get realistic enough to settle for a bit less, but only grudgingly.

      - About the same applies to the girls. Half the girls want the top 10 jocks. Some 90% of the girls want the top 10% most desirable guys.

      Interestingly enough, according to a recent study, girls seem to be a bit more realistic as to who they can actually get. Guys will tend to aim above what they can get.

      Basically anyone who says that someone can get laid anytime she wishes and by anyone she wishes because she's a girl, probably is doing the same daydreaming: thinking about those top 10 most popular girls in the whole damn college. Noone thinks of the shy, flat, nerdy girl in the back row when they make such generalization. That's her problem in a nutshell: to 90% of the guys she's just short of invisible, or little more than a piece of decor.

      To put it even more bluntly, half the western culture (of both genders) is generally more about getting a status symbol than someone they actually plan to get along with. It's the same as getting, say, the sportiest BMW you can afford: it's typically not as much because you actually need something that expensive and that much of a gas guzzler, but just to show everyone that you can afford what most others can't. Same here: girlfriends and boyfriends get chosen as status symbols more than anything else.

      And same as almost noone wants the lower half of the guys, if they have a choice, noone wants the lower half of the girls either. Note that I'm not talking about the butt-ugly gang of either sex. Just being _average_, already isn't much of a status symbol.

      So my take of what's going to happen is basically:

      1. They _will_ find a bunch of girls noone else wants, willing to give it a try. Then they'll get to go, "eeew" as they discover that they didn't get some smooth and highly desirable jock. (Who just happened to be single and limited in nerdiness to knowing how to install Windows.)

      2. The guys, conversely, will drool at the thought, right until they find out who they got to meet. And that it's not the horny super-model with huge tits, that they thought they _deserve_ for being so smart and for knowing all that command line stuff. Cue the mandatory "eew" from the guys too.

      Nice try, but probably no banana.

      Both groups will eventually settle on something more realistic, but if we're talking university LUGs and sororities, not yet. Well, not for most of them.

      (And before anyone accuses me of being sexist, note that I've talked about both genders.)
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:As I've been saying before by UbuntuDupe (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @05:23PM
      • Re:As I've been saying before by RyoShin (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @08:57PM
      • Re:As I've been saying before (Score:4, Insightful)

        by drsmithy (35869) <drsmithy AT gmail DOT com> on Wednesday September 26, @10:16PM (#20763559)

        - About half the guys in a high school or university want the top 10 super-models. Move a bit lower and about 90% of the guys want the top 10% girls. Some might eventually get realistic enough to settle for a bit less, but only grudgingly.

        - About the same applies to the girls. Half the girls want the top 10 jocks. Some 90% of the girls want the top 10% most desirable guys.

        Interestingly enough, according to a recent study, girls seem to be a bit more realistic as to who they can actually get. Guys will tend to aim above what they can get.

        Do you have a source for that ? I'd be interested to read it, because - along with your conclusion - the result certainly seems arse-about-face to me.

        On a related note, I also recall some study done recently (on a university campus, maybe ?), basically on how successful the "Wanna fuck" pickup line works on males vs females (obviously they werent quite that crude, but it sums up the objective). From memory, the "success rate" of males vs females was something like 20% vs 80% (ie: 80% of women received a positive answer to their attempt, only 20% of men did - certainly the difference was dramatic). Further, of the men who declined, the reason was almost always due to some form of outside restriction on their ability to say agree (spouse/significant other, unavailable at the requested time, inappropriate relationship, etc) rather than not being interested in the sex. For women, the reasons were basically reversed - most said no because they weren't interested.

        Certainly, the idea that men are more selective than women goes against everything I've ever read about (and experienced, but that's anecdotal) so I'd be interested to read your source for suggesting otherwise.

        Basically anyone who says that someone can get laid anytime she wishes and by anyone she wishes because she's a girl, probably is doing the same daydreaming: thinking about those top 10 most popular girls in the whole damn college. Noone thinks of the shy, flat, nerdy girl in the back row when they make such generalization. That's her problem in a nutshell: to 90% of the guys she's just short of invisible, or little more than a piece of decor.

        Actually, no, I'm thinking about the ~50% of average women out there, plus the ~25% of "more desirable" women.

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:As I've been saying before by fractoid (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @10:28PM
      • by pcgabe (712924) on Wednesday September 26, @11:02PM (#20763853)
        (http://myrighteye.blogspot.com/)

        noone wants the lower half of the girls
        What are you talking about? The lower half is my favorite part of a girl!
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:As I've been saying before by Germik (Score:1) Thursday September 27, @12:11AM
      • Re:As I've been saying before by Slashdot Parent (Score:2) Thursday September 27, @01:38AM
      • Re:As I've been saying before by rizole (Score:1) Thursday September 27, @12:01PM
      • Re:As I've been saying before by Kopretinka (Score:2) Friday September 28, @07:36AM
      • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • I am a geek and get mad pussy.. by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @05:07PM
    • Re:Optimistic by ribo-bailey (Score:1) Thursday September 27, @01:33AM
      • Fox News? by dcorking (Score:1) Thursday September 27, @08:39AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • End nerd persecution! (Score:2, Funny)

    by HaeMaker (221642) on Wednesday September 26, @04:18PM (#20760465)
    (http://www.hae.com)
    Gibert: I just wanted to say that I'm a nerd, and I'm here tonight to stand up for the rights of other nerds. I mean uh, all our lives we've been laughed at and made to feel inferior. And tonight, those bastards, they trashed our house. Why? Cause we're smart? Cause we look different? Well, we're not. I'm a nerd, and uh, I'm pretty proud of it.

    Lewis: Hi, Gilbert. I'm a nerd too. I just found that out tonight. We have news for the beautiful people. There's a lot more of us then there are of you. I know there's alumni here tonight. When you went to Adams you might've been called a spazz, or a dork, or a geek. Any of you that have ever felt stepped on, left out, picked on, put down, whether you think you're a nerd or not, why don't you just come down here and join us. Okay? Come on.

    Gibert: Just join us cos uh, no-one's gonna really be free until nerd persecution ends.
  • That is the Washington State University LUG, located in Pullman, WA. The post left that unclear, but the fact that this is a college-based LUG in a university town helps to explain why there are sorority girls involved.
  • Protection (Score:4, Funny)

    by SuperBanana (662181) on Wednesday September 26, @04:19PM (#20760489)

    So far there has been no comment on how a Linux user group is going to help sorority girls with their Windows machines

    Lots of protection.

    • You bet! by nrgy (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @04:34PM
  • by ViennaSt (1138481) on Wednesday September 26, @04:20PM (#20760491)
    It's the Washington State University LUG not the Washington State LUG.
  • Mustn't RTFA... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Otter (3800) on Wednesday September 26, @04:21PM (#20760521)
    (Last Journal: Thursday November 08, @06:00PM)
    I submitted this yesterday [slashdot.org], but apparently a working link [yahoo.com] to the story is considered bad form.
  • I thought LUG stood for... (Score:3, Funny)

    by who's got my nicknam (841366) on Wednesday September 26, @04:21PM (#20760523)
    (http://www.rustybadger.com/)
    Lesbian Until Graduation. That makes the headline of this article even more interesting!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • well... (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 26, @04:21PM (#20760531)
    I, for one, welcome our new sorority girl overlords.
    • Re:well... by punxking (Score:1) Wednesday September 26, @04:30PM
    • Re:well... by Plutonite (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @11:06PM
  • Hmmm! (Score:1)

    by BlueMerle (1161489) on Wednesday September 26, @04:22PM (#20760547)
    This brings a whole new meaning to "Got Root?"
    • Re:Hmmm! by Evil Pete (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @05:31PM
  • by filterban (916724) on Wednesday September 26, @04:25PM (#20760591)
    (http://www.hyroi.com/ | Last Journal: Friday October 19, @04:18PM)
    Bring a video camera to this event and you'll have the entirety of the next season of Beauty and the Geek [wikipedia.org] .

    Who will be eliminated first? Oh, the suspense.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by TexNex (513254) <nexxius.gmail@com> on Wednesday September 26, @04:26PM (#20760603)
    (http://www.texnex.net/)
    Its a nice idea but doomed...the geeks will be far to interested in rooting the girls box which leaves little if any time for a makeover. If, that is, the girls will get anywhere close to the geeks. Is anyone else here having flashbacks of "Revenge of the Nerds" on this one?
  • Geek = Nerd? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by krgallagher (743575) on Wednesday September 26, @04:26PM (#20760607)
    (http://www.krgallagher.com/)
    I have seen this reported in a couple of places in the last two days, and every time it makes my skin crawl. The reporters are all happy to make a joke out of it, and the LUG is too, so maybe I should not get upset. Still, I am proud to be a geek, but I do not consider myself a nerd. The quote that gets me in this article is "The idea is to trade their computer skills to sorority girls in exchange for a makeover and, possibly, a date."

    I can see a number of problems with this.

    • Just because I use Linux does not mean I can't get a date.
    • Using Linux might make me a geek, but it does not make me a nerd.
    • Why does the reporter assume the LUG members have the ulterior motive of getting laid?

    OK, I'll admit that most men have the ulterior motive of trying to get laid. Still, the tone of every report I have read is, "Look what the nerds will go through in an attempt to get laid." They are propagating a stereotype and no one seems to care.

  • by ZerMongo (1129583) on Wednesday September 26, @04:26PM (#20760613)
    (http://ramblings.wazzu.info/)
    WSU student here, I've been to a LUG meeting before and sausage-fest doesn't begin to describe it. Those hideous chuds will be lucky if they can make more than $10, especially from sorority girls. Sororities aren't stupid, they let the "less-than-supermodel" girls in who have usable skills, especially in regards to computers. The amazing story here is that somehow this made the AP wire.
  • hah (Score:2)

    by trybywrench (584843) on Wednesday September 26, @04:26PM (#20760619)
    nice way to find some pics and install vnc server and write down some ip's and.. ect.
    fyi, sorority girls like coorslite, 2 pitchers ought to do it
  • So what's the minimum bid that the nerds need to come up with to get near the girls? Oh wait...
    • Re:Bid by everphilski (Score:2) Wednesday September 26, @04:35PM
  • Our name is stereotype (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 26, @04:27PM (#20760633)

    Binky: Gee Ben, what are we gonna do tonight?

    Ben: The same thing we do every night Binky: reinforce offensive gender role stereotypes!

    Binky: NARF!
  • by 91degrees (207121) on Wednesday September 26, @04:34PM (#20760727)
    (Last Journal: Friday June 11 2004, @11:15AM)
    And how does that compare with calling someone out to fix a PC?

    And why am I asking here? Anyone posting on Slashdot already knows how to fix their own PC and most likely knows where to get nerds for free.
  • Nerds and Smarts (Score:4, Insightful)

    by bziman (223162) on Wednesday September 26, @04:37PM (#20760763)
    (http://swisspig.net/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 07 2001, @02:50PM)

    As a Linux user for well over a decade, I'm periodically tempted to drop by the local LUG, but every time I do, I find myself annoyed at the, well, nerdiness of the people there. I mean, sure, I know fourteen programming languages, I was a software engineer for a decade, and I'm working on a PhD in Computer Science (after already having studied Physics and Linguistics), but I just don't fit in to "Nerd" culture. This is because when I'm not doing something useful with Computer Science, traveling around the world, or I'm at the gym, or playing the piano, or sitting court-side at an NBA game or at any number of other social events. Your sorority girls are happy to have a smart guy who can fix their computer — but they're going to go for the ones who can function in society before they go to the fat, bespectacled, social outcasts that seem to congregate at LUGs.

    -brian

    • Re:Nerds and Smarts (Score:5, Funny)

      by SparkleMotion88 (1013083) on Wednesday September 26, @04:57PM (#20761047)
      Oh yeah? Well I worked as a software architect for 30 years while being a full-time professor in math and African history. I know 37 programming languages and 12 natural languages. When I'm not busy being intellectually awesome I like to go rock climbing, practice ninjitsu, wrestle bears, make 100 ft tall bronze sculptures, and play oustide linebacker for the Kansas City Chiefs. So I don't think I'm a nerd either -- I'm entirely too awesome. I don't need to offer to fix a woman's computer in order to spend time with her. I usually just walk around and they are attracted to my awesomeness as if it had its own gravity.

      I also think people who join LUGs are pathetic losers who probably couldn't attract a desperate woman *or* successfully wrestle even a small bear. I'm way better than them, and I'm glad to see that there are other folks out there who are just like me (only slightly less awesome).
      [ Parent ]