Slashdot Log In
New Gentoo 2007.0 Release Gets Mixed Review
Posted by
ScuttleMonkey
on Wed May 30, 2007 12:15 PM
from the resounding-meh dept.
from the resounding-meh dept.
lisah writes "Gentoo's recently released version 2007.0 gets a fair-to-middling review from Linux.com. Installation was a headache from the live CD and DVD versions, but the Gentoo Linux Installer saved the day and gets high marks for being 'far better than it's predecessor.' The user experience is also mixed — on the one hand, the distribution boots quickly, has great hardware support, and new, user-friendly artwork. On the other hand, 'for some strange reason, the installed Gentoo doesn't allow normal users to run any administrative applications.' Overall, it doesn't look like Gentoo offers any compelling reasons to switch to 'Secret Sauce' if they're happy with their current, uh, flavor."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
New Gentoo 2007.0 Release Gets Mixed Review
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 273 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Gentoo-Linux-Zealot Translator-o-matic! (Score:3, Funny)
Gentoo Linux is an interesting new distribution with some great
features. Unfortunately, it has attracted a large number of clueless
wannabes who absolutely MUST advocate Gentoo at every opportunity.
Let's look at the language of these zealots, and find out what it really
means...
* Gentoo makes me so much more productive.
Although I can't use the box at the moment because it's
compiling something, as it will be for the next five days, it
gives me more time to check out the latest USE flags and
potentially unstable optimisation settings.
* Gentoo is more in the spirit of open source!
Apart from Hello World in Pascal at school, I've never written a
single program in my life or contributed to an open source
project, yet staring at endless streams of GCC output whizzing
by somehow helps me contribute to international freedom.
* I use Gentoo because it's more like the BSDs.
Last month I tried to install FreeBSD on a well-supported
machine, but the text-based installer scared me off. I've never
used a BSD, but the guys on Slashdot say that it's l33t though,
so surely I must be for using Gentoo.
* Heh, my system is soooo much faster after installing Gentoo.
I've spent hours recompiling Fetchmail, X-Chat, gEdit and
thousands of other programs which spend 99% of their time
waiting for user input. Even though only the kernel and glibc
make a significant difference with optimisations, and RPMs and
faster. It's nothing to do with the fact that I've disabled all
startup services and I'm running BlackBox instead of GNOME or
KDE."
*
from the third-grade made-to-break components and dodgy
fan...
* You Red Hat guys must get sick of dependency hell...
I'm too stupid to understand that circular dependencies can be
resolved by specifying BOTH
and that problems hardly ever occur if one uses proper Red Hat
packages instead of mixing SuSE, Mandrake and Joe's Linux
packages together (which the system wasn't designed for).
* All the other distros are soooo out of date.
Constantly upgrading to the latest bleeding-edge untested
software makes me more productive. Never mind the extensive
testing and patching that Debian and Red Hat perform on their
packages; I've just emerged the latest GNOME beta snapshot and
compiled with -09 -fomit-instructions, and it only crashes once
every few hours.
* Let's face it, Gentoo is the future.
OK, so no serious business is going to even consider Gentoo in
the near future, and even with proper support and QA in place,
it'll still eat up far too much of a company's valuable time.
But this guy I met on #animepr0n is now using it, so it must be
growing!
Re:Gentoo-Linux-Zealot Translator-o-matic! (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.mekwars.org/)
Even if I *am* a Gentoo zealot myself, couldn't help but laugh reading your "translation" message. It's so damn true!
OTOH, you typed a 3K chars message as first post. Why I have the distinct feeling you already had it ready somewhere, to copy and paste it at the first chance, when anything gentooish reached front page?
Ah, I counted the chars with my ultra-optimized, distcc-recompiled "wc"! Zowie, I'm 1337!
Re:Gentoo-Linux-Zealot Translator-o-matic! (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday February 06 2007, @09:13AM)
* The inability to use the box while compiling (not true - I do stuff when compiling all the time, not what is being compiled mind you).
* Slashdot saying BSDs are 1337? Funny, posts saying that they like BSD tend to get modded "Troll"
* That circular dependancies are the only thing to cause Dep-hell? I've had plenty of cases where I have had "Package A" and "Package B", where both required "Package C" of differing versions, where neither would accept the same version of C, and the two versions of C didn't want to coexist. Maybe more helical than circular...
Sorry, while some of it is true in some cases, I find the lot of it quite not funny.
And no, I don't use Gentoo. While emerge has treated me better than some of the alternatives in the Linux world, it's not quite as hassle-free as I'd like.
Re:Gentoo-Linux-Zealot Translator-o-matic! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Gentoo-Linux-Zealot Translator-o-matic! (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.numbski.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday May 26 2005, @10:44PM)
I'm growing a bit impatient with Apple as of late. They do some things in the background that I just don't appreciate. Just to name a couple - if you go to set up Kerberos on the server version, you never get prompted to set up the master password, and when it comes time to set up non-apple replicas, you're left holding the bags. Took me a week to figure out a way around it and document it! Ugh.
Another is the fact that they hide the password hashes from root. In linux, you have
Whatever the case, it is ANNOYING.
Re:Gentoo-Linux-Zealot Translator-o-matic! (Score:4, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Tuesday October 30, @10:59AM)
If they managed to compile KDElibs without SSL, and if that's something KDElibs allows you to do (easily), then it is not their fault for custom-compiling something, it is your fault for not specifying SSL as a dependency.
As for the bleeding-edge build system, I can understand your frustration, but if (emphasis on if) KDE is moving towards that bleeding-edge system -- if it's actually on the roadmap -- then you should be putting it in your own bleeding-edge builds, too. I hate when we get things like upstart (in Ubuntu Edgy and Feisty) which has all these amazing capabilities, but ends up basically being used for launching runlevels because no developers actually wrote upstart-specific init scripts. (Which is one nice thing I can say for Gentoo; they do tend to always write Gentoo-specific init scripts.)
Now, I don't use Gentoo anymore, don't really like it for a couple of reasons, but if there's anything I hate about Gentoo bug reports, it's the ones I send to the Gentoo guys that get ignored for years at a time.
And one more thing... (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://ziva-vatra.dnsalias.com/~ognen)
Re:And one more thing... (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.musterion.net/)
Re:Gentoo-Linux-Zealot Translator-o-matic! (Score:5, Informative)
it all depends on what you want to use it for
(it's a bit like hitting a screw with a hammer and saying, hmmm this isn't going into the wall very well)
if you want something that's going to work first time, and that your not going to have to arse about setting up
(e.g. a commercial environment) then go with a rpm solution like redhat or suse (this way you've always got the option of support as well at the same time)
If you want something for running the latest cutting edge software and damned the consequences
the sort of person that would make the attempt at building his own conservatory on the side of his house go for Gentoo
Disadvantages
1. it's source based
which can mean less stable / well tested
ultimately gentoo is a source based dist, which means any binary files you end up with won't have been tested
and there's no guarantee of behavior as it all depends on how things have been linked
2. rpm's do some amount of checking when installing the binary, with gentoo it's assumed that whatever has been compiled is correct
(unless make install throws up an error during the build process or you write some checking into the script it's not always possible to guarantee that everything is installed the way it's supposed to be
admitily problems are rare but do crop up now and again
3. it takes ages to compile / install etc
the trade-off here is having access to the latest stuff, so I'm happy with this one
Advantages
1. if you want to get something working that's only just been released
it takes me 5 mins to write an ebuild script
it takes much longer to write an rpm spec file
(this especially comes in handy when your trying to add / remove patches / custom graft as part of the script)
the reason for this is a lot of the common stuff has been functionalised (is that a word?) into eclass files
this makes the whole thing default to a certain common behavior unless overridden in the script
also you don't have to list all the files that should be installed as it works it out for itself all auto-magically
in an ideal scenario for rpm you'd at least have both options depending on the use of the system (do some checking, don't do some checking)
ideally I'd really like rpm to take on some of the same advantages as this one (why not?, it might need testing / change of spec files but it'd be well worth it)
2. a lot of the scripts that form the bootup are much more up-to-date
again most of the stuff in the
it's part of the whole "if it's not broke don't fix it" thing, which in principle gives advantages to commonality if everyone is using the same sort of
startup scripts if your writing a RPM for several dists and may be more stable / tested
but the gentoo method is much simpler to write for / more automated
3. it's sourced based
which means it'll run on pretty much anything, any weird ass bit of hardware you can throw at it (usually)
(PS3 hint hint)
Personally I'm confident I can fix most things when they go wrong in the portage tree, via an overlay (or at least have the patience to wait for it to be fixed). but for the average Joe user in an office that couldn't give a monkey's for that sort of thing something binary / rpm is better suited
There's probably lots of stuff I've missed here but the general idea is
if you like home brew go to Gentoo (mmm tasty brew)
If you like it plain and flat go for Red Hat
This wouldn't have anything to do... (Score:2)
Yes, but... (Score:5, Funny)
And what did you think was going to happen.... (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Thursday June 05 2003, @09:57AM)
Ease of installation is not one of the drawing points of Gentoo. In fact, for some of us, an arcane installation procedure is the main draw...nothing teaches you more about linux than having to choose, configure, and compile every single piece of the OS.
Re:And what did you think was going to happen.... (Score:5, Insightful)
And what does this friend do for the lab? Scan student ID badges and watch for horseplay? If you had said that this friend was a sysadmin, or even a programmer, your argument might carry more weight.
Having spent most of a decade as a sysadmin, and several more years doing software, I
Being the good, close friend that you are, you might want to introduce this person to Google, on teh internets. It's a good way to learn about things like filesystems. Also goat pr0n.
2007.0 ? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://markbyers.com/ | Last Journal: Monday July 24 2006, @12:54PM)
Gentoo still for do-it-yourself'ers (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://splat.justfree.com/)
Re:Gentoo still for do-it-yourself'ers (Score:5, Interesting)
Personally I've always seen the strength of Gentoo in that it teaches you how an OS really works for the most part. You're doing every step along the way assuming a Stage 1 install which is the only Gentoo installs I'll perform. You are building your system from the ground up and with that you learn a lot about the underlying systems that you just won't learn from installing and using Ubuntu.
Of course the speed and optimizations are nice as well, with a Gentoo install the only things running on the systems are applications that you explicitly command it to run. It's a pain and I wouldn't really use it for a general purpose workstation but for some servers its simply great. Of course with Gentoo you have to always wait a bit after every release since every new release has big bugs. That's what testing servers are for though.
In short, I agree with you. There is definitely a place for both.
Update difficulties (Score:1, Flamebait)
(http://stylus-toolbox.sf.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday May 15, @11:50AM)
Re:Update difficulties (Score:5, Insightful)
# ln -snf
Real hardcore Gentooers would get the parameters the right way around.
ln -snf
Re:Update difficulties (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.penny-arc...s/2002/20020722h.gif)
Re:Update difficulties (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.neothermic.com/ | Last Journal: Monday June 05 2006, @07:29PM)
If you're getting to the point that you're getting incompatible updates with your existing setup, then you can always try `emerge -NDuep` and look at the resulting list it'll give you (p is for preview). From that, `emerge -C` anything you don't use any more, and then drop the 'p' from the command above and re-run it. It'll re-compile everything on your system with the latest packages, meaning that you should hopefully avoid the incompatibilities you're referring to.
Then again, if all that looks too much to do, Gentoo might not be for you?
NeoThermic
Re:Update difficulties (Score:5, Funny)
(http://pturing.firehead.org/)
There's always a way to fix these problems.
1. Use 'quickpkg' to save important things like Python before you break them
2. Plow over broken dependencies with 'emerge -C'
3. revdep-rebuild when needed
4. If it doesn't work, try the ~x86 package
6. emerge -uDNv world
7. wait a day, emerge --sync, try again
8. update often!! stale systems are harder to update
And the craziest trick of all....
9. backup your
One of those things should fix just about any update problem you encounter
Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
for some strange reason (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Monday October 01 2001, @06:53PM)
/. can't even quote without getting grammar wrong (Score:3, Informative)
But quoted on
This is NOT THAT HARD to get right, people. No apostrophe means that it's possessive. With an apostrophe,
it's a contraction of "it is" or "it has".
who cares about the installer? (Score:5, Interesting)
I really don't give a shit about a pretty installer. Let Gentoo focus on the power-user niche please, and if you don't like it, use something else.
GUI installer (Score:4, Insightful)
A little "hands on" experience with 2006.1 (Score:1, Informative)
So Gentoo was it.
Downloaded the Installer and off we go. Ok. First problem, no driver for the Areca-RAIDcontroller. Ok. Source is available, as well as modules for pretty much every distribution (well, every but Gentoo), and the controller is available in kernel from 2.6.19 and up.
2006.1 uses 2.6.18 (or something like that). Ok, so much for "bleeding edge"...
Compiled the driver but
After some research on some boards I finally found someone kind enough to compile it for this distribution so insmod would actually agree with loading it. Fine. Let's go.
After about an hour of tinkering with USE flags (seriously, I didn't know what half of them are for, and documentation... erhm... ok, let's not mention it) and deciding just what packages I want (it's a server, baby, so give it some!), the install started.
3 hours later, it ended. Ended, not finished. A package can't be downloaded. From no mirror. O...kay? Why?
A few hours and some research later, I learned that the package missing is missing because the version on the installer DVD is outdated. The newer version is, of course, available, though the installer insists in using the old one.
I'm pretty sure this issue could be resolved somehow. But I kinda wanted to use the server before it's turned into a heavy paperweight. I know, I'll be flamed for being a noob and whatever, 'cause I couldn't resolve such a simple issue, and I'm pretty sure the workaround is quite easy if you're a Gentoo-wiz, but those things tend to turn people away from a distribution. The newbies, because they can't figure out how to do something, and the Linux vets because they're used to at least working installations.
Re:A little "hands on" experience with 2006.1 (Score:5, Informative)
But Gentoo is not a distribution. It's really more of a meta-distribution. It can be tailored to just about anything you want, but you need to be willing to take ownership of it and work with it.
If you're looking for your server to Just Work (tm), then by all means, go get SuSe or Mandriva or Ubuntu or Fedora or some other distro with precompiled binaries and a slick installer program. Gentoo's not for everyone. But, if you're looking for fine-grained control over your operating system with some handy scripts to help you out along the way, then you have to be willing to get your hands a little dirty.
I picked up Gentoo as an educational tool; I figured building it from scratch was the best way to learn about Linux, and I was right. Since then, I've stayed with Gentoo because I like the flexibility it gives me, and because at heart I really just enjoy building things. Right now I have Gentoo installed on two servers, a desktop and a laptop at home, and I'm working on building a tiny MythTV frontend that will boot from a USB key (under 100MB). Gentoo's flexible enough to allow me to do that, but then again, I'm willing to sit with it until it's right.
Gentoo never has been and never will be a Just Works (tm) operating system. It's for the hobbyists, the administrators, the students: anyone who wants a much finer grain control over their system. If that's not for you, then no one at Gentoo will hold a grudge.
gentoo (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.s5h.net/)
Gentoo Is a good learning tool (Score:4, Insightful)
While staring at a bunch of GCC output is pointless, staring at the
I guess that it is the difference between owning a ford taurus (a very very easy to use, reliable, doesn't break and if it does its easy to fix, if there is a problem it just turns a light on on the dash that says "Problem" car) and owning an old muscle car. With the old muscle car, you're going to spend a LOT of time in the garage, covered in oil and grease, with a wrench in your hand either trying to get the thing to run again, or trying to squeeze just a LITTLE bit more torque out of it. While spending time in the garage playing with an old mustang doesn't make any sense to my dad the automotive investor, its freaking FUN!
I guess in conclusion, if you want something that is totally 100% rock solid, never breaks, you just turn it on and leave it in the rack forever without touching it, or really doing anything past the initial configuration....one of the other distros is probably for you (actually one of the BSDs is probably for you).
But if you want something that you really have to get your hands dirty with, that has all kinds of weird quirks and things that only YOU probably understand.....well then you should probably go with gentoo.
Where are the Gentoos of yesteryear? (Score:2, Interesting)
(http://blog.greglaun.org/)
The thing that irks me the most is that portage is so horrendously slow. It's beyond painful to use. I switched to paludis and that solved some of the problems, but it's a messy solution for now. Besides, Gentoo no longer has all of the packages I need. I've found myself having to download software from web pages more and more, which was something I wanted to avoid with Gentoo.
Sabayon does a pretty good job of giving me a good setup out of the box, but Gentoo's package management is so messed up now that it's no longer worth that much compiling. Ubuntu used to be noticeably slower for me to use, but either Kubuntu is faster or the gap has been closed and I just prefer the ease of Kubuntu now.
Reinventing the Wheel (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.myspaceistakingover.com/)
Gentoo is set up the same way as older Unices for privilege escalation. You cannot su if you are not a member of the wheel group.
Gentoo is for learning. (Score:1)
When you make a smooth ubuntu/fedora/mandriva install you might not have a problem but when you achieve a gentoo install, you learn. The same goes for daily use.
I stoped using gentoo because the lack of time (for compiling) but since I use ubuntu, I dont learn so much.
At least FreeBSD let choose between binary and building form source.
Gentoo 2007.0 Review from Daniel Robbins (Score:3, Informative)
(http://www.funtoo.org/)
Oh, and check out http://www.funtoo.org/ [funtoo.org] while you're at it and let me know what you think of the new logo.
-Daniel
Gentoo's great (Score:2, Informative)
(http://oc-productions.be/)
Gentoo is great.
These all make Gentoo my favorite distro.
If you don't want so many updates, sync less. If you don't want to see all the output, use a frontend. If you want to criticize the founder, go ahead, at least we haven't got Microsoft selling our software.
But the fact is: Gentoo installs great if you use the CLI, you haven't got any extra services running at boot, you can fully customize your system. These are the things I'm looking for in a distro.
FYI: I've never compiled for days. Unless you're too stupid to compile openoffice (we've got binaries too, you know)
Hardware support (Score:2)
(http://landsberger.com/)
I'm gonna try it (Score:2)
People don't get it (Score:1)
(http://www.valerieandevi.be/)
Gentoo is mainly for:
1) Developing and bleeding edge purposes - yes, it's nice to have a package manager that will include the latest of the late KDE and all it's dependencies. No it's not nice that you'll have to wait for tomorrow to get it complete, but it's easier than having to build something and finding all dependencies yourself as you compile.
2) Razor-edge performance on large single-purpose farms. The only way I would like to use Gentoo in production is when I need the optimizations for a certain product (say Apache OR MySQL) deployed on a large number of identical machines, I only need to build it once, then I can deploy (automatically) on the rest of the machines with all the performance I need pressed out, forget about all other USE flags (set everything - (gtk, kde,... and only +mysql).
Manual my ass! (Score:1)
What I would like to see is a Gentoo fork that is precompiled, but only to a certain extent. In otherwords, instead of compiling something yourself, you find a version of it that was compiled with the same/similar flags/optimizations, etc as you would like to have. However I don't know if this is feasible due to the sheer amount of hosting space and bandwidth it would take, and the seemingly infinite possible combinations of binaries there would need to be.
Don't use the installer (Score:1)
Arch Linux (Score:1)
(http://imago.novae-res.org/)
I just switched from Mandrake 2005LE, and I'm really loving it so far. I think I got everything setup faster than it originally took using Mandrake's wizards!
gave it a whirl. (Score:1)
Finally, something I'm qualified to comment on! (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.whitepost.org.uk/)
Not wishing to rock the boat, and not having a problem with gentoo per se, initially I maintained the status quo.
A few weeks ago, I made a decision. Future server rollouts will be Debian, Gentoo will slowly be discontinued. The reason is nothing to do with installation - I've got enough experience with it that I could install Gentoo in my sleep with my hands tied behind my back.
The problem is one of maintenance. With Debian or RedHat or Mandriva or almost any other Linux distribution, there's a specific version. A line in the sand, if you will, which states "this is what version we're dealing with".
Gentoo gets rid of all that, in favour of individual packages being marked stable/masked ("unstable")/hard masked ("very unstable, will break things, you have been warned"). In theory, you never have to do a major version upgrade of a Gentoo system. You just install everything that's marked stable that you want, if you need something specific that hasn't been marked stable you unmask it. A bit like running Debian Stable with the odd package from the testing branch.
This sounds great, until I now point out the problem.... Gentoo suffers from bit rot. Before you mark me down as a troll, let me explain. Packages still turnover as they age. Eventually, packages are marked obsolete - ie. dropped from portage altogether - and unless you've already taken account of this possibility, once that happens it's a bugger to reinstall them. And once a package is dropped because it's obsolete, sooner or later other packages won't take account of the older versions quirks and version dependencies become at least partly down to luck. Good luck rebuilding a system which has failed with the exact same versions of all the packages it had on there - if it's not been updated in a while and you haven't accounted for such a possibility, the task is to all practical purposes impossible. Combine this with package QA which frankly is nothing like that of Debian - "Stable" generally means "It doesn't cause anyones individual PC to keel over horribly", not "It plays nicely with everything else in the network like it's suppsoed to" - and you've got a recipe for long drawn-out pain if you're trying to run Gentoo on anything more than a few systems.
The only solutions that I've found are:
Note that I've omitted "keep a copy of every package you install" or "make a note of the version of every package you install". These are effectively useless because ebuilds frequently use the packages sourceforge site to download the code from, and if the package moves or the version that you have in your (old) copy of the portage database is removed from sourceforge, you can't install that package and you've got to do an emerge --sync to get an updated ebuild (and an updated everything else in the process). It's not like any other distribution where the mirrors keep a copy of every package so it doesn't much matter if the upstream server on which the project is hosted breaks somehow. Unless you keep every package from day 1 complete with all its dep
hmmm (Score:1)
Further more, a wise man once said, "work smarter, not harder", spending hours if not days on end compiling everything from souce seems "harder" to me. Gentoo zealots of course have their opinion, and I'm proud of them for it. But I see nothing wrong with easy to install, within a few minutes, binary OS installations and upgrades for 99% of the Linux community.
IP violations in Gentoo .. (Score:2)
Article has some good points... (Score:2)
(http://clocksmind.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday February 25 2007, @05:09PM)
First, it would get so far in the boot process and then start complaining about not having enough space to create stuff - despite 160MB RAM and two swap partitions nicely sized that could have been used, but I couldn't even log in as root to turn on the swap partitions.
Second, the install hung when trying to load X. I had to use the case's reset button to recover.
I can't say if there were other problems with the LiveCD as that is about as far as I got with the it. I switched to the minimal CD and have been happily installing since, albeit a slower process - but I'm learning more about the Gentoo way of things, and am quite happy about that. Still, it would have been nice to be able to use the LiveCD instead of having to download stage3 and portage.
Needless to say, I might wait until 2007.1 to install Gentoo on my Desktop.
Switching? (Score:1)
(http://intrepidstudios.net/jaker/blog)