Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Linspire Announces Freespire Distribution

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Mon Apr 24, 2006 06:27 PM
from the let's-muddy-the-waters-a-bit dept.
LinuxScribe writes "Is the world ready for another community Linux distro a là Fedora and openSUSE? We're about to find out, as Linspire used the Desktop Linux Summit to announce a community-driven version of Linspire, to be called Freespire. But here's the twist, Freespire will come in two flavors: a completely open source version and a version that includes all of the fully-licensed proprietary apps, drivers, and codecs in Linspire."

Related Stories

[+] Linspire CEO dispels Linspire Linux Myths 278 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Chances are that you think Linspire lets you run Windows applications, that you have to run it as root, and that it's really not quite a proper Linux. Wrong, wrong, and wrong. At LinuxWorld in Boston this week, CEO Kevin Carmony explained what Linspire Linux is, and isn't all about. Carmony said that people are still getting these things wrong. Yes, in the beginning, Linspire had the goal of letting Linux users run Windows applications with WINE, but it dropped that theme years ago. As for requiring you to run as root, that was, Carmony said, only the case with an early alpha release that was never put in the public's hands. As for not being a real Linux, that's nonsense, too."
[+] Linspire CEO Considers CNR for Ubuntu 92 comments
bored2k writes "Kevin Carmony, President and CEO of Linspire, Inc., is using the Ubuntu Forums to ask for input and explain why he thinks a popular and heavily focused on usability distribution like Ubuntu needs Linspire's $20 per-year CNR service. From what he says, both him and Mark Shuttleworth (Canonical/Ubuntu's founder) like the idea. Would CNR honestly help Ubuntu grow, or is it just a scheme to cash in on it's success?"
[+] Kevin Carmony Responds to Criticism 300 comments
sharkscott writes to tell us that LXer's Don Parris took a few minutes to get Kevin Carmony's response to the large amount of criticism he has been taking over offering non-free software in Linspire. From the article: "Essentially, Carmony's position is that, in ten years of holding out, the FOSS community has made relatively few gains, in terms of convincing vendors to release libre codecs and drivers. In other words, the strategy doesn't seem to be working. Additionally, while some will be patient, most users would prefer to have something - anything - that works in the meanwhile."
[+] An Early Look at Freespire Linux 171 comments
An anonymous reader writes "DesktopLinux.com takes an early look at Freespire Linux in a recent article. Linspire will be releasing their first version of Freespire, the first community Linux distribution to include many third-party proprietary codecs, drivers, and software. From the article: 'While I still have my doubts about the long-term wisdom of using proprietary software and drivers with Linux, I must say that if you feel you need to use such programs, Freespire makes it much easier than any other Linux distribution. And, when is all said and done, that's really what Freespire is all about -- making Linux as easy as possible for users.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • *~shudder~* (Score:4, Funny)

    by showardkid (823639) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:32PM (#15193607)
    (Last Journal: Thursday October 13 2005, @09:01PM)
    You mixed that up, man. There's an accent on 'a' and not on 'la'. It's "à la". Yes, I'm a Foreign Language nazi.
  • Free as in capable (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 24 2006, @06:33PM (#15193614)
    I'm curious if this will end up with a more Windows-replacement centric Linux system or just one that departs from the Free Software Foundation's picture of what the GPL should embrace.

    Second, I always felt that a good Web browser at its core should just be a simple file viewer but it has departed pretty far from that - it would be nice to have my Linux partition able to use/open/view as many or nearly as many types of files that my Windows machine can.
  • To beat an analogy to death (Score:4, Funny)

    by uberjoe (726765) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:35PM (#15193625)
    They should call them Beerspire and Speechspire.
  • I wonder what's up (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Illbay (700081) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:37PM (#15193632)
    (Last Journal: Saturday February 03 2007, @01:16PM)
    Fedora was established as the bleeding-edge benchmark for development of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

    Linspire, in contrast, is rather staid and unadventurous. One questions whether a "bleeding edge" is even required for that distro.

    So what is the purpose of "Freespire"?

  • As in... (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 24 2006, @06:38PM (#15193636)
    these [osdir.com] shots?
  • I don't get the point (Score:5, Interesting)

    by brunes69 (86786) <slashdot&keirstead,org> on Monday April 24 2006, @06:39PM (#15193641)
    (http://www.keirstead.org/)
    Yet another community-maintained Debian-based distro? Why in the world would I want to choose this over (U|K)buntu? Debian based, but with a bastardized broken KDE... sounds super!

    And before anyone says anything about CNR (click and run), I will point you to klik [atekon.de] - free open and wonderful, and not tied to any distro.

    Enough said.

  • Mod Company -1: Troll (Score:4, Insightful)

    by LostCluster (625375) * on Monday April 24 2006, @06:39PM (#15193644)
    Let's not forget what we're dealing with here. This is a company with a known history of pulling whatever attention getting stunt it can, including starting with a name of "Lindows" that got shot down by MS. All along, their goal has been simple: try to find a buck out of distributing open source software, including making their "Click and Run" store of mostly freely available apps.

    This is about as newsworthy as a paid-software vendor announcing a free trial edition that replaces all the "good stuff" with reminders to buy the full version.
    • Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by AuMatar (Score:2) Monday April 24 2006, @06:56PM
    • Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by NitsujTPU (Score:2) Monday April 24 2006, @07:06PM
    • Re:Mod Company -1: Troll (Score:5, Insightful)

      by linvir (970218) on Monday April 24 2006, @07:19PM (#15193833)
      I don't get it. Why do people always piss on Linspire for selling Free Software, when so many others had already been doing it for so long? Is it because of a perceived lack of contribution back into Open Source on the part of Linspire? From a slightly biased Wikipedia article [wikipedia.org]:
      Linspire has contributed millions of dollars in direct funds and contributed code to several open source projects. For a company of Linspire's size, their contributions have been quite admirable. With very few exceptions, all code that is developed by Linspire is contributed back to the open source community. Linspire is also the lead maintainer for important projects such as Nvu, Lsongs, Lphoto, and an important contributor to other projects such as Mozilla Firefox, Gaim, Reiser FS, and many others.
      [ Parent ]
    • I really miss Lindows (Score:5, Interesting)

      by r00t (33219) on Monday April 24 2006, @07:19PM (#15193837)
      (Last Journal: Friday May 05 2006, @11:53PM)
      I so wish this had gone to trial, especially since the appeals court ruled that the jury would get to decide if "windows" was a generic term back when Microsoft first started using it. Killing the Windows trademark would be lots of fun.

      Not that I'd want to see "Macrohard Windows", "Slack Windows", "Brown Dog Windows", "iWindows", "eWindows", "Turbo Windows", "IBM Windows", "Debian GNU/Windows", "Windows for Playgroups", "WindowsBSD", "ClearWindows", "Sunny Windows"...

      Aw, yes I would. :-)
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Mod Company -1: Troll (Score:5, Insightful)

      by chris_eineke (634570) on Monday April 24 2006, @07:23PM (#15193854)
      (http://www.chriseineke.com/ | Last Journal: Friday January 06 2006, @04:23PM)
      try to find a buck out of distributing open source software
      Yeah, like Redhat, SuSE, Mandriva, etc.

      Tell me: When has selling Free / Open Source Software become a sin against humanity?
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by pnutjam (Score:2) Tuesday April 25 2006, @10:03AM
    • Re:Mod Company -1: Troll by crossmr (Score:1) Tuesday April 25 2006, @04:52PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Hmm... Nice (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Psykechan (255694) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:42PM (#15193665)
    Looks like Linspire is planning on giving away the razor and trying to sell the blades for $20 a year. [freespire.org]

    On the other hand, at least the "creating a user account so you don't run everyhing as root" step isn't optional [freespire.org] in Freespire. This "new" distribution is something that might be a good first step for newbie Linux users that want certain features (DVD/MP3 playback) immediately after install.
    • Re:Hmm... Nice by LocoMan (Score:2) Monday April 24 2006, @09:32PM
      • Re:Hmm... Nice by rajafarian (Score:1) Wednesday April 26 2006, @12:08AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Oh My Gosh (Score:2)

    by cosmotron (900510) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:44PM (#15193674)
    (http://www.thecosmotron.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday February 22 2006, @08:36PM)
    On DistroWatch [distrowatch.com], there are around 600 distributions, how can people want to make any more?
    • Re:Oh My Gosh by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Monday April 24 2006, @06:50PM
    • Re:Oh My Gosh by linvir (Score:3) Monday April 24 2006, @07:05PM
      • Re:Oh My Gosh by TheDreadSlashdotterD (Score:1) Monday April 24 2006, @07:19PM
  • weren't the add-ons the ones that gave Linspire the viability to ACTUALLY replace Windows? Without them, Linspire is naked, and I don't think they have the experience to handle a "plain vanilla" distro.

    So if I had to choose between Freespire and say, Ubuntu Dapper, I'd choose Dapper all the way.
  • Nice... (Score:4, Funny)

    by advs89 (921250) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:45PM (#15193683)
    (http://www.adamdoyle.net/)
    I think I'll be the first to say that I like this idea.





    Well, I don't actually... I just thought it would be cool to be the first to say that.

    -Advs89
    • Re:Nice... by muszek (Score:2) Monday April 24 2006, @08:34PM
  • This is good (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ZachPruckowski (918562) <zachary.pruckowski@gmail.com> on Monday April 24 2006, @06:48PM (#15193691)
    More distributions is better. I think that if every distro does one thing right, with a thousand distros, we're in great shape. Linus's Law of "With enough eyes, every bug is shallow" also works on features. If one distro does a feature really well, then everyone else can adopt it. That's the beauty of the GPL, LGPL, and BSD licenses, anyone else in OSS can copy it or re-do it. Therefore, adding another distro or two is good.

    Confusion is not really an issue, because anyone looking at Linux will be getting a friend who has a favorite distro, or will have a computer vendor with only one or two choices, which will likely be a choice between Freespire and Linspire or Fedora and Red Hat
    • Re:This is good by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday April 24 2006, @06:58PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • I don't know about you ... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by alienpeach (930248) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:49PM (#15193702)
    (https://vehris.com/)
    ... but I'm actually fairly interested in this. Personally, I've wondered when I'd be able to use a both free and legal DVD player in the US.
    • Re:I don't know about you ... (Score:5, Interesting)

      > Personally, I've wondered when I'd be able to use a both free and legal DVD player in the US.

      Exactly. While all the FSF absolutists will flame away I say it is about darned time. Of course I wouldn't switch distros JUST for the DVD player or any of the other closed bits, but if I could buy em and run them on my preferred distro I'd get a P.O. to em.

      You see, it is only by being willing to compromise (the minimum I can get away with) on the Free principles have I been able to deploy a linux based desktop into a public library setting. Just one example, we use Crossover Office to get IE running. IE isn't negotiable, the only question is Crossover, VMWare or which other method I was going to use to get it running. Too many sites just don't work any other way. For example, assume I'd brazened my way past all the other objections and deployed without IE. Last year wne the Katrina refugees flooded in and discovered they couldn't file an application with FEMA from our labs I'd have been tasked with getting XP installed on am post haste. Especially when Rita hit us directly, making it OUR patrons that we wouln't have been able to help get disaster assistance.

      We don't have much of a need to play video DVDs thankfully, but it doesn't go down all that well when I explain that it would be illegal to do it. People just can't believe it and I really don't have the time to explain the complicated legal probems involved. At home I use libdecss and say "screw em if they don't like it." Hell, I have even mentioned it in protest letters to elected officials. But I won't deploy it at work, the legal liability is just too great. This isn't a problem Free Software can solve. We already HAVE the code but there isn't any path to lagalizing it. Same for Windows Media, Real, etc.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:I don't know about you ... by rob1980 (Score:1) Monday April 24 2006, @08:17PM
  • Plan 9 is better (Score:4, Funny)

    by bizzynut (887594) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:57PM (#15193738)
    Plan 9 offers a completely usable, modern desktop. So there is no need for Linspire.
    • Re:Plan 9 is better - rioutous!!! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday April 24 2006, @07:17PM
    • Re:Plan 9 is better (Score:5, Interesting)

      by linguae (763922) on Monday April 24 2006, @08:03PM (#15193996)
      Plan 9 offers a completely usable, modern desktop.

      Plan 9 is a research operating system. I like Plan 9's architecture, file system, and many other ideas. Plan 9's goal is to further extend the notion of Unix's "everything is a file" idea. Everything, even the windowing system (rio), is a file. Plan 9 also vastly simplifies systems programming (compared to Unix). Plan 9 is a wonderful research operating system that I would love to tinker with and explore.

      However, it isn't a desktop replacement for Windows/OS X users or even for Linux or BSD users. There is no office suites (or even a word processor unless you love text editors and TeX or troff), no browser on the scale of Firefox or Konqueror, no music/video players, nothing that 99% of the world uses with a computer. Besides, I'm pretty sure that users are more comfortable using this desktop [kde.org], these desktops [gnome.org], or especially this desktop [apple.com] before they use this desktop [bell-labs.com]. For even the most ardent *nix hackers or computer scientists, Plan 9 would be something they played with on the side (kind of like Minix or an operating system that they're working on), and Linux/BSD is their main OS.

      I like Plan 9, but it isn't a desktop OS; it's a research OS. However, Plan 9 is a very innovative operating system; I wish that the major OS sellers (I'm talking to you, Apple and Microsoft) would be a bit more cutting-edge in the architecture of their OSes rather than just appearances (even though Apple has done very well since the bought NeXT; they have a hybrid kernel, for one). Plan 9, L4, the MIT exokernel project, and other projects look very interesting, and I would like to see them in use.

      [ Parent ]
  • Would that give us freedows?
  • Evolution (Score:5, Funny)

    by the darn (624240) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:58PM (#15193748)
    (http://ret3.net/)
    Lindows -> Linspire -> Freespire
    So, if they hadn't been forced to change, would this new distro be called Freedows? The mascot could have been the Freedow Bandido!
    • Re:Evolution by linvir (Score:1) Monday April 24 2006, @07:12PM
    • Re:Evolution by crazyprogrammer (Score:2) Monday April 24 2006, @07:53PM
      • Re:Evolution by Godji (Score:2) Monday April 24 2006, @09:19PM
        • Re:Evolution by lord_rob the only on (Score:2) Tuesday April 25 2006, @01:30AM
    • Re:Evolution by JOrgePeixoto (Score:1) Wednesday April 26 2006, @03:05PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • *yawn* (Score:2)

    by nurb432 (527695) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:59PM (#15193749)
    (http://slashdot.org/~nurb432/ | Last Journal: Friday August 27 2004, @03:24PM)
    YAFLD... Dime a dozen at this point.

    If it survives a year, then we can talk about it.
    • Survive? by dhasenan (Score:2) Monday April 24 2006, @08:37PM
  • by Ankh (19084) * on Monday April 24 2006, @07:02PM (#15193764)
    (http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/)
    Freespire will come in two flavors: a completely open source version and a version that includes all of the fully-licensed proprietary apps, drivers, and codecs in Linspire

    Well, maybe, but they're hardly the first to do that: Mandriva (Mandrake) has been doing it for a long time, with the commercial version including extra drivers as well as applications. Probably others have too.

    What makes a community effort stand or fall is how well the outside people are integrated, and how much voice they have.

    One reason I the distribution I do is that it attracts both seasoned programmers and newcomers, and there's a good chance I can show my laptop to people and say, here, this is what it's like, you can use the same as me. It's not clear that I'll be doing that with Linspire, nor that a community-based version that's not as good will in fact help me. Who will it help?
  • Ubuntuspire... (Score:4, Funny)

    by blankoboy (719577) on Monday April 24 2006, @07:03PM (#15193770)
    (http://www.skintube.com/)
    Too little too late. Linspire sees Ubuntu becoming the popular girl at school so now she'll sleep with anyone for free.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 24 2006, @07:05PM (#15193778)
    Freespire: A Linux Distro For When You Couldn't Care Less About Freedom (http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060424 164142296 [groklaw.net])

    ---
    Stefano Spinucci
  • This is a good thing. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by MsGeek (162936) on Monday April 24 2006, @07:09PM (#15193795)
    (http://www.msgeek.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday August 23 2005, @08:30PM)
    For people who are used to the Windows way of doing things, the deliberately simplified Linspire way of doing things is a very good thing. It's good that they are "getting religion" about the inadvisability of running as root. And the ultimate best thing of all might be CNR technology being opened up. Imagine alternative Free CNR repositories! With CNR 100% opened up, there will be no stopping people from creating a F/OSS-only CNR repository that people who might not want to get chained to Linspire, Inc. might use instead. This was something the Lycoris community was trying to do with IRIS, Lycoris' answer to CNR.

    With Lycoris by and large a dead issue, a Freespire might be just the ticket for folks who are just not ready for Ubuntu/Kubuntu yet.
  • There are some differences (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Mostly a lurker (634878) on Monday April 24 2006, @07:35PM (#15193896)
    Many of the comments so far are to the effect that Freespire is just another "me too" free distro. I think a careful review shows that this is not quite true. The most important difference is that it comes, out of the box, with proprietary software when necessary because there is no viable free alternative. One can argue whether this is a good thing, but it is a difference.

    The indications are that they have thought this through quite thoroughly. The initial announcement and the web site are quite well done, I think. Considering it is still four months until the first beta, they have a good FAQ (here [freespire.org]) which is worth a read. I intend to at least give it a try when the time comes.

  • by suitepotato (863945) on Monday April 24 2006, @08:06PM (#15194003)
    That sums up my take on this. It's like an Object Desktop version of Windows ME. Glitzy to start, but under the hood... (insert blood curdling newbie scream here...)

    I really don't see people who use this only because of nebulous dissatisfaction with Windows XP who don't even know what DOS and Windows 3.11 were (or even ME) learning to get under the hood and tinker and learn Linux. CNR sounds nice, but ultimately the bag of hammers Unix lineage cannot be avoided and will hit them in the face like a 2x4. Back to Windows.

    I think it is nice that they want to do this. I also think it is a sign of desperation. And an admission of how far Linux has to go before any sort of real desktop adoption. It took Apple to get a *nix OS on the desktop, not insignifigant backing. It's going to take the same sort of chutzpah and power and polish and support to get Linux out there. I don't see these people bringing that, Red Hat and Novell are rabidly corporate, and who's left to address the desktop?
  • First Beta in August 2006? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Merlynnus (209292) on Monday April 24 2006, @08:18PM (#15194045)
    WTF? From their FAQ:


    30. When will Freespire be available for download?

    The first beta download for the community will be available around August, 2006.


    They're announcing a Linux distribution that won't be available for download in BETA for another 4 months?

  • Very supprised (Score:1)

    by D0M1N8R (970510) on Monday April 24 2006, @08:36PM (#15194107)
    This is a great move IMO on Linspires part and I really dont understand why its being recieved so negatively. Use your preferred distro and be happy with it. Does everyone really feel a need to go bashing on another distro simply because its not the one that they use? To top things off Linspire is a big sponsor of a lot of the major open source projects but no props for that either. Most people seem to be pretty good at nothing but bashing. Please show me some big support coming from Ubuntu for some major open source projects.
  • not *all* the codecs are included... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by hex1b (46201) on Monday April 24 2006, @09:06PM (#15194219)
    ...only the cheap ones. This was asked by a member of the audience and answered by the CEO during the presentation where the announcement was made today in San Diego. Specifically, no DVD licence.
  • How many PCs can this crash? (Score:3, Funny)

    by crossmr (957846) on Monday April 24 2006, @09:11PM (#15194243)
    (Last Journal: Thursday February 15 2007, @08:40PM)
    Linspire the only distrobution to lock up both VMware and the host system.
    I think that really says all that needs to be said.
  • If it wasn't for Linspire, there wouldn't be any cheap hardware available in large stores like Frys. Also by buying linspire computers you are supporting linux developers. What's wrong with that?

    Their latest ones are quiet low power (think Watts) AMD Geode based machines. Who else is fighting against the MS tax in the large stores?
  • by postmortem (906676) on Monday April 24 2006, @09:28PM (#15194298)
    (Last Journal: Sunday March 18 2007, @04:53PM)
    And two are clearly RedHat and SuSE. Third.. Debian or other uber-geek version. Today there are hundreds or thousands of Linux distributions. It is like hippie movement from 60s: every a**hole can make their own OS and put it on public servers. They got downloaded (new stuf!! check it out) and forgotten within week. IMO they better apply for jobs in RH, SuSE and bring in their ideas, and help Linux (that matters) as whole gain share. With years things just are going worse: more and more "unique" distros pulling in different directions. Quality over quanity. RedHat makes money - small distro companies don't.
  • The question is.. (Score:1)

    by mikesd81 (518581) <<mikesd> <at> <ptd.net>> on Monday April 24 2006, @10:44PM (#15194503)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    Will it encourage people to add users or encourage to just have a root user as it is now?
  • by jesusfingchrist (853886) on Monday April 24 2006, @11:02PM (#15194577)
    (http://folding.stanford.edu/)
    Ya Suse , RH , Mandrake (whatever) all try to make money as well but it's always struck me that Linspire's (whatever) primary goal from the word go was "money" where as RH, Suse , etc wanted to make a distro and needed to make money to support that idea. That may not be the case at all but that's what it seems like. Short story : I dont like Linspire cause it seems their heart isn't in it, just their wallet.
  • Notes from the Freespire announcement (Score:3, Informative)

    by twasserman (878174) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:51AM (#15195079)
    I am attending the Desktop Linux Summit where Kevin Carmody (Linspire CEO) made the Freespire announcement. (Side note: he's a very good speaker.)

    I thought that his positioning of Freespire and his reasoning behind it are worth sharing with Slashdotters. Linspire is, of course, a purely commercial effort, with the goal of selling a shrink-wrapped OS that looks externally as much like Windows as possible. His target audience is not the Slashdot crowd, but rather the people who buy their computers at Wal-Mart. Really! For them, it's all about the out-of-the-box experience, starting up a computer with preinstalled OS and apps and just using it. As someone who has recently installed Mandriva, Fedora 5, and Ubuntu Breezy on various machines, I think that the experience is much better than it once was, but still falls short of the "Wal-Mart" or even the Windows experience.

    To listen to Kevin Carmody, Freespire is offered in the spirit of recognizing the contributions of the open source community, and giving people the opportunity to stay "pure", i.e., without licensed and proprietary pieces, or hybrid, where the user can choose to download and perhaps pay for the licensed and proprietary pieces. He gave an analogy with food, where the choices were Junk Food (Windows and proprietary software), Healthy Food, and Vegan. Open source vegans, of course, are those who would never want music in the proprietary MP3 format or images in the proprietary JPG format.

    His belief is that most consumers and business people would like Healthy Food, which is some mix of Linux and those proprietary formats, plus some drivers for graphics cards, etc.. He and his company are actually going out to Fortune 500 companies and talking to them about why they should consider a move to something like Freespire rather than suffering the pain and expense of migrating to Windows Vista (if and when it ever ships). This is a fairly brave, not to say crazy, thing to do, and I think that they deserve some credit and support for their evangelism, even from people who don't care for the whole Linspire business. Getting 3-4% penetration of Linux (any flavor) on corporate desktops would be quite an achievement, and it won't come from Linspire on its own.

    Carmody also said that they are going to open source Click N Run because they think that it is the best updating program, and are offering it to others for the taking. If I were responsible for Ubuntu or other Debian-based distros, I would be very tempted to take them up on their offer. I've done enough "apt-get"s.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Lindows, freedows, freeblows? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by thephydes (727739) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:16AM (#15195135)
    Actually I dont give a flying F**K what they call themselves or what their motives are, or for that matter how many friggen distros there are. Give me a viable, easy to use alternative to m$ crapware is all I ask. The key words here are "easy to use" I use OS X at home M$ at work and FC4 for my server. IMHO, OS X rocks, M$ sucks and FC is somewhere in between. I also don't give a F**K what you think about my opinions by the way, so any flames wont be responded to. In general Linux distros are too different to M$ to attract new users - unless they are like me and read/digest/think about viable alternatives. Come on guys .... get into the real world and ask yourselves why the linux distros have not taken off ...... they are too efffin different to M$ shitware. And M$ is what we are being fed. As soon as linux distros "lookand feel (whatever the hell that means)" familiar, and are easy to: install new software/ play the latest shit game/install the latest and newest usless piece of crappy software, then we may be getting somewhere. For f**cks sake, give linspire a go. At least they are attepting to make the user experience consistent and friendly. Jeez its good posting to Slahdot whith a skinfull under my belt ....... Yours in the spirit of inebriation TimTheTosser
  • People don't seem to get this (Score:3, Insightful)

    Everyone complaining about 'yet another distribution', and saying 'why this over Ubuntu / Fedora /... doesn't seem to understand (or are conveniently ignoring) a couple of points:

    • Ubuntu etc. cannot legally play a DVD
    • cannot legally play an mp3
    • and countless other examples

    ... at least in the US. I haven't even looked into the legalities in the UK, where I am, as I frankly don't care for home use, but this stuff really stops people using Linux in a lot of situations.

    I think it will be interesting to see how they integrate the proprietary stuff, (and how it's paid for, free as in beer is a big attraction of OSS, whatever the principles at stake).

  • ATI Radeon drivers work? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by VGfort (963346) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @08:55AM (#15196168)
    (http://www.vgfort.com/)
    Well if those drivers work in the Freespire with all their codecs and stuff, I'll give it a try. I've yet to get those to work in anything but Windows so far.
  • by llamaluvr (575102) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:47PM (#15193689)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday June 09 2004, @10:06PM)
    Dude, I'll take the huge pile of manure any day. I can avoid the big pile; but I'd keep stepping on the little turds and messing up my shoes.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:now more than 500 distros (Score:5, Funny)

    by abscissa (136568) on Monday April 24 2006, @06:54PM (#15193726)
    The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:now more than 500 distros (Score:3, Insightful)

    by rolfwind (528248) on Monday April 24 2006, @07:57PM (#15193982)
    I say the more the merrier. Everybody keeps saying "oh why don't all the distros just come together and make a superdistro."

    I hate to break it to some, but a lot of the people working on improving the distros (as a hobby or a job) wouldn't be doing so if there was only 1, 3, or even 7 ultra-distros.

    Especially the hobbyists. They'd feel like their voice wouldn't be heard, that they are just another cog in the machinery, or the distro doesn't go in the direction they want (can 1 distro satisfy the goals of LPS or Gentoo or Ubuntu or DamnSmall and an Embedded linux all put together?) - and out they'd be out the door, working on something else that interests them.

    If someone wants monolithic, go Windows or MacOSX. For me, complaining about the amount of distros is like shitting on someone elses work...

    Though I can sympathize sometimes:)
    [ Parent ]
  • by yoyhed (651244) on Monday April 24 2006, @08:32PM (#15194091)
    damn, you were so close to making sence to.

    What was that?

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:good! (Score:1)

    by agent_no.82 (935754) on Monday April 24 2006, @10:17PM (#15194414)
    (Last Journal: Sunday July 16 2006, @09:38PM)
    Have you tried Kubuntu? All the advantages of Ubuntu with a solid KDE. My current system.
    [ Parent ]
  • by gui_tarzan2000 (625775) on Monday April 24 2006, @10:18PM (#15194416)
    It is one of the easiest and slickest out there too. I have tried many different versions and keep going back to Linspire.

    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.