Gentoo Founder on his way to Redmond 527
Rotworm writes "Recently former founder of Gentoo Linux, Daniel Robbins, has managed to procure employment with Microsoft. Robbins describes his position as "helping Microsoft to understand Open Source and community-based projects." Seemingly there's no scandals as Robbins managed to finalize the transfer of all Gentoo's IP to the Gentoo Foundation, Inc."
hmm... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
>
> He's probably going to kill younglings.
Hmm...
Do I reply with "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!" or "It's a TRAP!". Decisions, decisions...
Decisions, decisions, decisions, decisions, decisions [ ... ] decisions! Decisions! I! LOVE! THIS! DISTRO!
Re:hmm... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:hmm... (Score:3, Funny)
you work for yahoo? :-)
Re:hmm... (Score:3, Insightful)
Earn some money???
I believe that this is a plot of microsoft to hide an insider so they can do some espionage, using Daniel Robbins as a mere pawn in the game.
I dunno if I should take this seriously, but since I can't detect sarcasm, I will.
Espionage, where? In the Open Source community? Pfft, they could accomplish that by subscribing to a couple of mailing lists. And if DR was a "hidden insider", why would they hire him in such a public fas
Re:hmm... (Score:5, Insightful)
As a seriously busy individual, he always took time out to talk to the little guy.
Unfortunately, his work with Gentoo never paid the bills enough for him to rely upon it.
How can you possibly insult someone that has a family to support, and bills to pay? He has paid his dues!
I hope Daniel Robbins will take his customary brilliance to Microsoft and do great things. Of all corporations that need a breath of fresh air, Microsoft is foremost. Business Model reinvention la? Perhaps we can look forward to new Microsoft products being GPL'd
Good luck Daniel!
What an embaressment (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:hmm... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:hmm... (Score:3, Funny)
It's like having an asshole big brother that throws you the keys to his Camaro once in awhile.
MS dont give out free lunches... (Score:5, Interesting)
He will be brought on board to continue the MS strategy of embrace, extend (in a proprietary fashion) then replace. MS do not want to support linux in any way, they want to kill it. Dead. Every linux box sold represents money ripped from their pocket.
My guess is that this could be something like:
- get linux to run well on MS virtual machines, so linux can become just an app running under 2k3, and therefore slowely sink into oblivion.
- work on their command line tools [slashdot.org]. Looks like they have finally realised that the {Li,U}n{u,i}x way of providing powerful command line utilities is actually pretty useful (perhaps learned from the struggle [securityoffice.net] when they first tried to convert hotmail to NT
Interesting times ahead.
Re:MS dont give out free lunches... (Score:2)
I thought about that when they announced they'd support linux running in emulation. They could maybe supply a sort of buggy half crippled userspace linux with a view to discrediting linux.
I can't see it working. It might win some points with the PHB brigade, but most linux users are more interested in freedom than cost. If that is the plan, I can see it reboundin
Re:MS dont give out free lunches... (Score:3, Insightful)
BSD, Darwin, OS X, HURD, Inferno, OpenServer, Unixware, Haiku OS, OpenSolaris (If/when it happens), Windows...
It doesn't matter, that's my point. The community exists now, and it will rebuild the kernel from scratch if it has to.
Re:MS dont give out free lunches... (Score:4, Insightful)
Microsoft cares a lot about money, but they care much more about saturation. If the market is completely saturated by Windows, everyone will use Windows because everyone uses Windows. That's why Microsoft is letting Indonesia [slashdot.org] pick up Windows for a buck a pop. They don't just care about the money, they care about getting as many people to use Windows as they can. Once they're in a dominant position they leverage that to extort exorbitant fees for their software from certain customers.
It's the ends and means for Microsoft. Imagine Steve Ballmer screaming "UNLIMITED POWWWWWERRR!!!" as he eletrocutes Linus Torvalds and throws him out a window with the Force. That's Microsoft's view of things.
Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Section 2B - Contractee will also instruct Microsoft Corporation (C)(TM) on the use and operation of the computer program known as 'cvs'.
The question was about the riders (Score:5, Insightful)
A lot of times, things are "tied" together in contracts between an individual and a large corporation. Commonly, a single employment contract will cover hiring the employee, granting permission for employee to enter employer's premises, granting clearance to trade secrets (and a covenant not to disclose them to third parties without express permission), and granting an assignment or work-for-hire setup for the employer to use any copyright, patent, trademark, or trade secret created by the employee using employer's resources. The trouble comes when employers insist on BS riders such as broad non-compete agreements or broad "all your idea are belong to us" IP-grabs that cover works and inventions developed by the employee entirely using the employee's resources.
Re:The question was about the riders (Score:3, Informative)
Microsoft uses NDAs to keep you from telling others what you saw while you were working there, and a "we own every thought from the moment you sign on board with us" agreement that I believes even covers your dreams. You can list technologies that you want excluded up front, so you still own them, but you give Microsoft a "worldwide, perpetual
Re:hmm... (Score:2)
Woah (Score:5, Funny)
Do they ship cluebats freight? I guess they do now.
Re:Woah (Score:2, Funny)
They're not even giving him a ticket in coach to get out to Redmond? Well, how about that for a warm welcome...
When in doubt (Score:4, Insightful)
Is this the beginning of a strategy for Microsoft? Can't beat them, just buy them or the lead developer?
Re:When in doubt (Score:5, Insightful)
Free Software is free as in freedom... but it is also free as in beer so these people *really* need to get their green paste from somewhere...
Or, you really did think that those "donations" where enough to live?
Re:When in doubt (Score:2)
Re:When in doubt (Score:2)
Re:When in doubt (Score:5, Interesting)
Plus, the "change things from the inside" thing isn't new either. The MS Macintosh Business Unit, formerly MS Bay, consisted primarily of Mac shareware and commercial SW developers who had been hired to work on Mac Office and Mac IE. These were guys who thought, ate, drank, and slept "Different." They are the reason Mac Office tends to leapfrog Windows Office in features and overall quality with every release, and also why IE on the Mac didn't suck. Anyway, even these guys ended up chugging the Kool-Aid - when Apple started releasing competitive products (most recently Safari), these guys acted as if it was their God-given right to be the exclusive developers of these types of software, going on record in the Mac press, denouncing Apple for daring to create competing products. Somehow they'd gotten into the MS mindset of expecting that their (MS's) stuff was supposed to be the only stuff around to support the OS, or to be treated as first-class citizens. The difference was that Apple didn't have to support this same opinion.
Back on-topic a bit, I think the gentards have nothing to worry or be ashamed about. Even though he'll probably turn with time, this isn't a pride thing. Maybe he just needs to eat, and wants to use his skills as a means towards that goal (shocking!). Who knows, maybe working for the bad guys really will change them for the better.
Re:When in doubt (Score:3, Informative)
Netscape 4.7 was a crashy, buggy, piece of bloated shit.
Cyberdog was dead and gone.
iCab has always supported about 1/10th the features of *real* web browsers.
And IE 4 was the best browser on the Macintosh platform, by far. Actually, when it hit version 4, it was the best web browser ANYWHERE by far... most compliant, most features.
Believe it, it took a LONG time for me to finally switch from Netscape 4.0.8 (the las
Re:When in doubt (Score:2, Insightful)
People are so afraid of "conspiracy theories" that they sometimes miss the simple reality that is right in front of them. Remember, this is MICROSOFT. Just because our culture is becoming overly respectful of authority figures, politicians, and multinationals d
Not New.. MS did this to borland (Score:3, Informative)
Borland filed suit to stop them. They weren't successful (obviously), although MS admitting to recruiting 34 employees of Borland.
article about it. [com.com] http://news.com.com/2100-1023-279561.html?legacy=c net [com.com]
Internet Explorer (Score:2)
Apple is garnering hype (all publicity is good, right?) through the whole KHTML/WebCore thing. MS is standing on the sidelines with a free program it used to kill Netscape wondering why nobody uses says any words about its toy any more.
How could they make IE better? Why not join the crowd and fully release the source?
He's no genius, but Robbins has shown a knack for getting programs off the ground, generating hype, and garnering support. He made compiling cool agai
Good luck! (Score:5, Funny)
I hope he is successful! I'd sure like to see Windows users have to emerge msoffice2k3 and wait for six days.
Re:Good luck! (Score:2)
Re:Good luck! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Good luck! (Score:3, Interesting)
Q: Is it true that in Sovie Russia every peasant will get a tractor from the State?
A: Yes, it's true, but it's not a tractor it's a bike and they don't give them, they take them away.
Same with Microsoft:
Q: Is is true that the Microsoft will give freedom and choice to users for free?
A: Yes it's true, but it's not for gratis and they don't give it, they take it away.
Re:Good luck! (Score:2)
Latency (Score:2, Funny)
Isn't Linux capable of multi-tasking?
GNU/Linux, *BSD, and Microsoft Windows NT series operating systems are capable of multitasking (use program A on your PC while program B is installing), but the installation process does introduce latency. You can use everything else on your machine, but you can't the package that you're installing from source, whether it be from a tarball, an SRPM, Gentoo ports, or FreeBSD ports, until it's built.
Re:Good luck! (Score:2, Troll)
Hey, maybe it was that slow to *emerge* as to safeguard the *decompression*!
YOU HAVE NO CHANCE TO SURVIVE MAKE YOUR TIME (Score:5, Funny)
Sweet Job! (Score:5, Funny)
Dr Who (Score:5, Funny)
the game-shows where losers are beamed up to the Dalek Mothership?
EXTERMINATE!
EXTERMINATE!
Borgs Are Here... (Score:2)
Re:Borgs Are Here... (Score:2)
Maybe he's just infecting the mothership [wired.com]. Who knows?
Linuxsoft (Score:3, Funny)
Wow, what a short article (Score:3, Interesting)
Seriously, I hope he didn't accept low pay with the promise of stock options like a lot of Microsoft employees have in the past. The day of the Microsoft made millionnaires is over.
Re:Wow, what a short article (Score:2)
Not really. Now you just work there for 40 years, 25K a year. Voila! Millionaire.
Re:Wow, what a short article (Score:2)
Wow, you must work in the dept where the govt decides how much you qualify for in student loans. If you make $25k for a year before quitting and going back to college, you should have $24k in the bank at enrollment.
Kamikaze (Score:3, Insightful)
I think Microsoft already understand Open Source projects - and, quite obviously and unsurprisingly, they don't like them. Justifiable from a business perspective, crap from (almost) everyone else's perspective, and I have trouble seeing what change he could bring in Microsoft.
Unless of course he's got several kilograms of TNT strapped to his chest when he has his first meeting with Bill :)
Former Founder? (Score:5, Insightful)
How can someone be a former founder? Once you found something, that's it, you always will have been the founder, right? I mean the Founding Fathers of America aren't the Former Founding Fathers - they are still the Founding Fathers even though they are all dead, and don't take much of an active interest in the affairs of the country anymore.
-If
Re:Former Founder? (Score:2)
Re:Former Founder? (Score:5, Informative)
Just an incorrect paraphrasing from the original article.
PLD seeks NBF*. (Score:3, Funny)
emerge founder!
This is bad (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft is not going to do that. They want to know everything about open source because the want to compete with it, ie: beat us. It'd be nicer if Microsoft used this help to collaborate with opensource better, opensource things, etc etc.
Re:This is bad (Score:2)
Oh, come on man, you do not need to hire anyone to "know everything about Open Source"... it is WHY it is open source, it is FREE for EVERYONE (yes, even for Microsoft), you just have to go to sf.net, read some wikis etc... it is all there...
If Microsoft wanted to know Everything about OSS they just have to put a bunch of their monkeys^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hengineers to make deep research into open source...
Bad moderation (Score:5, Insightful)
BillG is a smart guy who surrounds himself with smart guys. MS started out of a motel room in New Mexico and didn't become a near monopoly solely out of luck any more than it did out of sheer creativity. MS is huge for a few important reasons:
1. They recognise opportunities and make maximum use of their resources and connections. MS became the "king of programming languages" for micros inthe 70s and 80s because BillG immediately saw the potential of the Altair and the desperate need for a friendlier method of programming the system. They also used their connections and networking skills to arrange a meeting with IBM re. DOS as well as to locate and purchase QDOS.
2. They are a bit sneaky--they will sell something they don't even have yet (DOS) and create demoware/vapourware to stall and kill competition in a field where they are lacking (GO/pen computing/etc--"they might have it now, but big ol' MS is gonna have it REAL SOON NOW"--yeah right).
3. THEY RESEARCH THEIR COMPETITON--MS has historically been very paranoid. Even with their position today they view EVERY competitior as one who could destroy them. When MS plays in a market they research EVERY LITTLE THING about that market and EVERY COMPETITOR. BillG himself operates that way. If he meets someone who has something interesting to talk about but BillG knows nothing about it, BillG will spend every waking moment for a couple days learning about the subject. The next time he meets that person he can talk with that person like he is a seasoned expert.
It is for that third reason why MS has a whole department of Open Source Specialists in its employ and has had for years. It is also how the Halloween Memos came to be. It doesn't matter how badly MS slags Linux or how much it scoffs at Free software--it has ALWAYS apporached it as competition with the potential to destroy Microsoft. I'm willing to bet it's been on BillG's personal radar for a decade already (when MS was just starting to realise the Internet was a game they had to play).
So the parent to this post is exactly right: MS is essentially "stockpiling ammunition" for the battle with Free software. How they will use the knowledge and people they acquire could go many ways:
1. They could use it to make their FUD sound more credible--for example, some weakness in Linux to exploit in the "get the facts" campaign or items to avoid or downplay where Linux has the advantage.
2. MS operates by acquisition, not innovation. They might have to avoid GPL code to keep its code secret, but it can at least steal IDEAS from GNU apps. It is also already well known they've lifted BSD code many times. This is OK though--at least MS software gets better as a result.
3. If they CAN'T beat Free software, they'll be prepared to "join" it. It may be a cold day in hell before MS Office is open, but if Linux meets or beats Apple's market share and all indications are that it won't go away, MS will be prepared to form a "Linux business unit" to port Office and other apps to the platform. It won't be "Free/Libre", but if MS dominates application software for Linux it can steer the platform and continue to be the industry's biggest player. This is what they have done with Apple--Microsoft is the biggest vendor of MacOS applications, and stunning industrial design aside, Macs are becoming more and more PC-like.
Yep it would be nice if MS was more cooperative, but it is just too far from their business model. MS NEEDS software to be closed or else it would have to completely re-invent itself. It is simply easier for it to try and make the competition work to its advantage or simply go away.
In other words (Score:2)
helping Microsoft to understand Open Source and community-based projects
PR
Anakin (Score:5, Funny)
Alternate pathway (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Alternate pathway (Score:2)
Yeah, all* those production-level business-use Gentoo boxes will soon** switch to Windows Server 2003.
* By 'all', I mean 'both'
** By 'soon', I mean 'not'.
Isn't this... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Isn't this... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Isn't this... (Score:5, Informative)
hrm (Score:2)
MSPortage maybe?
Imagine future versions of Visual Studio (that's their compiler, right? never compiled anything on Windows since i'm poor) coming with a version of portage that yanks down all the OSS that'll compile on Windows.
Wouldn't *that* be interesting?
former founder? (Score:2, Funny)
It's gonna take them a while... (Score:3, Funny)
"Today, class, we're going to learn about kde..."
"Err, Mr Robbins sir, is this going to take much longer? I gotta go pee"
NOOOOOOOOO! (Score:2, Funny)
Microsoft uses PPC, Apple uses Intel, now this ? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Microsoft uses PPC, Apple uses Intel, now this (Score:5, Funny)
I used to say that I sold my soul.. (Score:2)
The good news was that I got paid more than it was worth!
I hope it is not applicable here.
(As it turned out, it wasn't so bad to be a consultant doing Windows. I didn't even have to lie. The main problem was my health... which I'm certain was a totally unrelated problem. Very certain. I think.)
Translation: (Score:2)
Translation: MSFT is paying me more money than g-d to jump up and down "Balmer Style" yelling Open-Source Open-Source...
The Microsoft Memo (Score:2, Interesting)
I wish him well (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone else notice that this isn't the first ABQ->Redmond migration for a "distribution" founder?
Quick, we can still rescue him! (Score:5, Funny)
Who's with me?
A small daring group is all it will take to rescue the founder of Gentoo - with luck on our side, skill, daring, and the element of surprise, we should be able to pull this off before the Empire gets him into Darth Gates compound!
You will never rescue him, We have him now! (Score:3, Funny)
You underestimate the Power of the Gates side of the Source, my young apprentice! All your plans have been foreseen and even now this fully operational hovercraft is approaching the traffic jam to intercept your foolhardy rebels in their vain attempt to resist the Empire!
Fear not! (Score:3, Funny)
Besides this, we haven't had communications with Daniel Robbins recently
He hasn't transfered IP, domain names etc. yet (Score:2, Interesting)
This isn't true. He has agreed to, if his lawyer approves the deal, but we are still waiting for him to transfer all IP and the domain name gentoo.org
Here is the Gentoo Not-for-profit mailing list archive and you'll see there is no mention of it yet.
http://archives.gentoo.org/ml/gentoo-trustees/ [gentoo.org]
Re:He hasn't transfered IP, domain names etc. yet (Score:3, Informative)
Helping Microsoft to understand^Hmine Open Source (Score:2)
can't wait! (Score:4, Funny)
It is very sad that he could not make money (Score:5, Informative)
His approach was technically superior to the other distros in its fundamental approach, and funding could have cured any detail problems. It was the right approach. He went broke, and we should all be sad at this.
The nice thing would have been if some government had funded him. None did.
Thus he works for Microsoft. I imagine he is sadly bitter about it all.
Namesys is also having payroll problems, though our problem is more due to my divorce than anything else.
Hans
(Author of Reiser4)
Re:It is very sad that he could not make money (Score:4, Funny)
Perhaps if you would have paid more attention to her than that damn code!
me: one ticket to hell please...
bo (+2 Funny?)
Re:It is very sad that he could not make money (Score:5, Funny)
I like the code more. It is certainly more beautiful, and perhaps more useful too....
Re:It is very sad that he could not make money (Score:4, Funny)
Re:It is very sad that he could not make money (Score:3, Insightful)
Thus he works for Microsoft. I imagine he is sadly bitter about it all.
Why bitter? I don't know him personally, but bitter doesn't sound like someone who hasn't suceeded at a project should feel. It seems a bit silly to discuss how someone I don't know would feel about a failed business, but it seems to me the more common emotion would be sadness, dissapointment, etc. Bitter makes it sound like someone betrayed him personally.
Obviously he didn't have to choose to work for Microsoft. He's obviously a
Re:It is very sad that he could not make money (Score:4, Insightful)
It was Daniel that failed to make it work, the community is under no obligation to provide any finances - if he wanted to put such an obligation on them chosing open source was a bit of a mistake
I have to say that from what I've seen of ebuilds and the like, it's a seriously cheesy bunch of hacks that really have no place in anything that intends to use words like "money" or "professional"
Why would a government fund something like Gentoo? There are distros out there that actually have paying customers, they are in a far better position to service any government needs than a bunch of whinging 15 year olds on a forum
You can't be bitter about this stuff though - everyone walks into Open Source development with their eyes open, if you then choose to feel that people owe you, or you deserved better; that's your problem. Your code is the contribution and the reward, anything else is a bonus imho.
Sorry to hear that namesys is having problems, I hope they get resolved soon.
Ooooook, *scary* (Score:5, Funny)
- Apple goes x86,
- Debian releases new stable,
- Deep Throat reveals himself,
- Robbins works for Microsoft.
Seriously, what's next? Stallman stating "Meh, GCC takes forever; i'll just buy some software at Walmart"? Duke Nukem Forever going gold? The Bitboys compiting with nVidia? Microsoft releasing the source for Internet Explorer?
Cut this shit already. Please. It's not funny anymore!
Re:Ooooook, *scary* (Score:3, Interesting)
Pink floyd getting back together.
Re:Ooooook, *scary* (Score:3, Insightful)
- jwz moves to OSX
skunk works (Score:3, Interesting)
Just like apple maintaining an x86 OSX branch for years, "just in case" is a reality that sometimes proves to be useful when you least suspect it.
So then MS therefore needs d00ds who have a proven track record of original thought as opposed to drudge work. A company needs both kinds, but it has to start with original thinkers before the hard working drudgework drones take over.
obligatory nazi analogy (Score:3, Interesting)
you can't *quite* get away with that in corporate america just yet, but the next best thing, when you have X*10 billion dollars in the bank getting moldy, is just to hire them away.
sorry to interrupt all the guffawin' and shuckin' and jivin'. carry on with the lame star wars references and other assorted jokery.
Re:ok (Score:5, Insightful)
No, what they are trying to do is to break up the opensource community by hiring all the top talent. If they hire the top leaders and put them in project s that never see the light of day, then they don't have to worry about them as competitors to MS. It is worth the million or two in salary to get a top guy. The get the facts ad campaign probably is less effective than buying the top guys out.
MS has a history of doing it. They hired away all the top talent at Borland. They hired COM guru Don Box, which in my opinion was to get him on board with
Re:ok (Score:2, Informative)
Re:ok (Score:4, Interesting)
Which can be summed up as
"Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer"
Surprised no-one else quoted that one first....
Re:ok (Score:3, Insightful)
hummmm (Score:2)
Re:Uhhh (Score:2)
Since there are others out there who obviously don't 'get it', allow me to explain it to you. They don't have to hire someone to understand open source. It is all out there, it is open, it is free. It is conceptual. OSS isn't hiding anything. What is fscking stupid is that MS is hiring someone to tr
Re:Uhhh (Score:2)
Re:WHY? (Score:2)
When I was unemployed I slept a lot. It's free, and it's fun, plus you burn fewer calories, so you eat less. now I'm somewhat over-employed, and never seem to get more than 5-6 hours.
Re:Two Words (Score:2)